User Reviews

Schedlyzer by Optisol

4.5

4 customer reviews

USER REVIEWS - All reviews

"Schedlyzer"
4.5
Version Info: N/A
Purchased Date: January 01, 2009

Purchasing, Millworks Etc., Inc.
June 24, 2010
Dave Palmer
close

Ratings Breakdown

Ease of Use
5.0
Implementation
4.0
Fits Needs
5.0
Features
4.0
Customer Service
5.0

Pros

Extremely good core algoithm. It produces the optimum result for a given input and it is fast, always less than 1/2 a second. Great Gantt chart dispay. It is easy to update. New jobs can be "tested" on the schedule and easily removed, modified, etc.

Cons

Could not list my jobs in the order I wanted t see them. Has that old DOS feel, not the smooth presentation of more popular programs. Report output was not satisfactory so some reports are not used. Some limitation in "what if" analysis of different scenarios--can be confusing.

Overall

Excellent choice for us--we just wanted a pure algorithm to determine sequencing in the shop. It does that very well.

"Great Simulation/Capacity Analyzing Tool"
5.0
Version Info: N/A
Purchased Date: March 01, 2010

Process Engineer, Schlumberger
May 18, 2010
Luis Fernandez
close

Ratings Breakdown

Ease of Use
5.0
Implementation
5.0
Fits Needs
5.0
Features
5.0
Customer Service
5.0

Pros

- Great Customer Service
- Full Gantt Chart View with ability to dig into each project or job to see specific steps
- Resource Utlilization Charts for Constraint Analysis
- Analysis of adding extra workers/machines and how it will impact the delivery dates
- Calendars to change the amount of hours workers are in the shop.
- Analysis of adding overtime and impact on delivery dates

Cons

- We have not come across any cons. The great customer service behind the product facilitates its implementation.

Overall

- I truly recommend this product to any job shop/project management team who needs to analyze constraints based on due dates of orders to customers. It is very simple to use and it is very powerful to analyze what if scenarios by changing number of workers/machines, schedules, priorities.

"Automated Schedule"
5.0
Version Info: 2.3
Purchased Date: November 01, 2007

Manager, SRCO Inc
May 05, 2010
John Barkume
close

Ratings Breakdown

Ease of Use
5.0
Implementation
4.0
Fits Needs
5.0
Features
5.0
Customer Service
5.0

Pros

A powerful schedule tool. We are a small manufacturing company that make aircraft hardware with many processes, both in and out of our shop. This tool lets us forecast potential bottlenecks and work around them BEFORE they affect our deliveries. We can see ahead of time where machines will be lacking work and schedule them to fit our needs. Every machine, outside processor, and employee can have their own alloted time to work into the overall picture.

Cons

I need to manually compact the Access database weekly.
I wish the table column widths could be saved.
I would like operations to have the option of overall prioritizing.

Overall

We are a small machine shop and this tool fits us. But I can see this tool working in very large shops as well.
I looked at several other more expensive packages and they did not have the power and flexibility of Schedlyzer.

"Schedlyzer"
4.0
Version Info: 2.1
Purchased Date: April 01, 2007

Tooling Manager, Micro Plastics, Inc.
May 04, 2010
Wes Due
close

Ratings Breakdown

Ease of Use
5.0
Implementation
3.0
Fits Needs
5.0
Features
2.0
Customer Service
5.0

Pros

It produces accurate schedules very fast. It lets me see conflicts and bottlenecks much earlier in the process. We were easily able to link the software to the shop floor, through a .net program we created, so employees can update time remaining on the current job. Job entry is fast and easy after your templates are set-up. It handles multiple shifts and vacations well. Reasonable cost.

Cons

Should include a way for shop floor to update time remaining. My learning curve was 2 months but I had no background in scheduling. Mouse scroll button doesn't work on most screens.

Overall

I would highly recommend this software to anyone wanting a finite scheduler to handle dissimilar routings with cross trained employees working different shifts.