RXNT vs CharmHealth: Which is a better fit?

Jazel: Hi, my name is Jazel. I'm pharmacist owner of Acts Pharmacy. I give Rxnt a four. Before Rxnt, we were using Office Ally. However, it's not robust enough for what we need in terms of the EHR, the electronic records, and just data capture. We chose Rxnt because of its cost. It's on the price range that we were comfortable with, and then the needed applications in terms of e-prescribing, billing, it is all there. Rxnt provided us the training that we needed to properly use it. They helped us set up in terms of the billing, setting up our insurance companies, setting up our templates. That's about it. If you are a pharmacy looking for an EHR software and you're just starting, check on Rxnt just because they're in that portable price range and they're robust enough to meet the pharmacy needs.

Matthew: Hi. My name is Matthew. I'm a pediatrician, and I give ChARM EHR a rating of five. We've looked at a number of different EHRs in our quest for a sophisticated but easy-to-use program. We were using Practice Fusion, but after the cost got prohibitive and the software not really that functional, we started looking for some other avenues. We looked at Kareo, we looked at AdvancedMD, and we looked at Amazing Charts. Those were the three big ones that we looked at. All of them were very good, but they were either cost-prohibitive or too complex and not easy to use via the scheduler or to be putting in notes. ChARM EHR was one of the ones that we looked at, and it really fit the bill perfectly. It's, was easily customizable, and the cost, because we have a small practice, was very low. It did what we had to do. It was very user-friendly. The scheduler was easy to use. Plus, it gave me an app on my phone to look at my schedule on a daily basis. Couldn't ask for any more than that. ChARM was very easy to implement in the office since it was cloud-based. We were able to input most of the data very, very easily since we have a small practice, but the user interface was very user-friendly. It didn't require a lot of time, and because it was cloud-based, it could be done from various locations, both from my office and from my receptionist's home if we had to. So the onboarding and the implementation was very, very quick and easy. We found ChARM EHR to be a good fit for our practice, because it was relatively small, and the cost was minimum. However, if your practice is a large practice, the cost may get prohibitive. The ChARM EHR program is very easily user-friendly. It's customizable, and it is pinpointed for any particular practice, whether it be pediatrics, family medicine, general medicine. The varied templates that are there are easily customizable. Their software support is excellent. They get back to you very quickly. So I really recommend it highly for anyone that has a practice that is relatively small, that needs a user-friendly program, and it's easily customizable.