MIP Fund Accounting vs Banyon Fund Accounting: Which is a better fit?

It's a great improvement over QuickBooks and is a true accounting program that is prepared for non-profits. Our auditor is impressed and happy.

I think on the downside, you have to keep paying a fee annually. The software has to be updated annually.

That's where my company has it's greatest strength is that it is currently pushing for one solution and this solution is it.

We have missed several key features that they weren't able to reproduce from Abila.

The initial support has been excellent and easy to work with. Overall, it's been a marvelous experience.

Also the W-4 issued by the IRS says Single, Married or Married but filing at a higher Single rate. The box Single/head of household is confusing.

The product was nice it was easy to use and very interactive. I like the fact that the dashboard is very comprehensive.

There are no examples whatsoever. You need to know the system already in order to understand what the manuals mean to say.

Your support team is great. All of them are wonderful, and it is greatly appreciated.

Also, the initial training was terrible. Had to teach myself which caused stress and errors.

Out of all of the Banyon programs I utilize, I feel like fund Accounting is the most functional, and stores the most valuable information. I like that all Banyon programs integrate fairly seamlessly.

We least like the execution errors and weird glitches, the untimely posting, and the inability for many people to utilize the same program at the same time.

It is easy to see what has been spent off an encumbrance, The process is easy to understand. Banyon does a good job of making it clear on a check how a disbursement was coded.

Not being able to correct a posting error if a wrong fund is chosen.

Fairly easy to use, I like the reports and they are helpful for each department.

Customer support, and extremely hard to correct accounting errors.