BUCS vs Banyon Fund Accounting: Which is a better fit?

Putting in received payments is very easy and learning the software has been fast and easy. I love the amount of support you receive from the company in terms of training and help when issues arise.

The only thing I dislike with BUCS is where we do our occupational licenses.

The reporting program is fantastic and it has helped my board members better understand the finances of the organization.

Not sure I really like that but it doesn't make things aligned. Again I have only been using this program for 4 months so not sure I know anything else that I dislike.

Aaron J. A

Deputy Clerk-Treasurer

The ease of setting vendors up to the ease of paying vendors via A/P. This software is very user friendly.

I like the overall ease of maneuvering through loading invoices to printing checks and balancing bank reconciliations. Loading and keeping track of vendors and printing 1099's is also easy to use.

Your support team is great. All of them are wonderful, and it is greatly appreciated.

Also, the initial training was terrible. Had to teach myself which caused stress and errors.

Out of all of the Banyon programs I utilize, I feel like fund Accounting is the most functional, and stores the most valuable information. I like that all Banyon programs integrate fairly seamlessly.

We least like the execution errors and weird glitches, the untimely posting, and the inability for many people to utilize the same program at the same time.

It is easy to see what has been spent off an encumbrance, The process is easy to understand. Banyon does a good job of making it clear on a check how a disbursement was coded.

Not being able to correct a posting error if a wrong fund is chosen.

Fairly easy to use, I like the reports and they are helpful for each department.

Customer support, and extremely hard to correct accounting errors.