Aircall vs Avaya UCaaS: Which is a better fit?

James E.: My name is James. I am the Chief of Staff at Slurp. We have one to 50 employees, and my rating for Aircall is four out of five. Before Aircall, we were using Zendesk to call. The reason that we switched to Aircall was Zendesk was far too expensive for our business. Aircall was easy to implement and had extremely good live tracking of the team. Also, very, very easy to use inbuilt metrics to conduct analysis. Getting started with Aircall was extremely easy. The onboarding team helped us through every step to port our number from Zendesk to Aircall. And once we had the system up and running, it was extremely easy to set up user accounts onboard and train the team with the support of the Aircall onboarding team. I would strongly recommend the use of aircall, especially if you're using multinational phone systems. It supports calls across the globe with no functionality or additional requirements.

Bernard: I'm Bernard, Unified Communications Cloud Consultant. And I rate the Avaya OneCloud UCaaS Service a four out of five. For more reviews and details about the Avaya Cloud Services, click below. Prior to using the Avaya OneCloud UCaaS Service, there was an evaluation of several solutions to replace the legacy of via PBX system. That included solutions, including Microsoft and Zoom and possibly the RingCentral solution. The solution for OneCloud UCaaS was a logical solution based on the recommendations from the resellers and the overall popularity of what is becoming a more cloud oriented service from Avaya. Avaya was chosen because of the familiarity of the Avaya Solutions overall from the reseller involved. It was relatively easy to understand the differences from the traditional solutions to the more of a cloud-based, licensed subscription-based service. And that led to the decision over some of the other alternatives. Switching to the Avaya OneCloud Service was relatively easy as there was an agreement to incorporate some of the new J series phones, which made it very easy to port the numbers, get the employees familiar with the new devices and the new services. And from an administrative perspective, it was easy to move to a subscription-based model without really changing a lot of the overall operations. Overall, it was very, very easy in general. My advice for anyone considering a cloud solution would be to consider what they have currently and then evaluate what their overall future needs are. With respect to the Avaya Solution, it provides a fully featured portfolio of cloud-based services, and you should compare that to Microsoft, for one. If you are a Microsoft shop, having a Microsoft solution is very attractive and will allow you to support a wide variety of different types of devices from Polycom or Poly and many others. If you're using the Avaya Solution, you're going to be really influenced to use Avaya only devices, which are not going to be readily available on other services that you might switch to later, such as 8x8 or others. But generally speaking, if you're a Microsoft shop, Microsoft is a great solution. If you are more into video overall, and that's the basis of how your employees are going to communicate, Zoom and their unified communication solution provides a very cost-effective and popular service used around the world for employees to easily use and learn. But if you are a more of a traditional Avaya-type customer, the Avaya Cloud Service, or OneCloud, is very attractive and can provide you with a fully featured voice and collaboration service along with many of their contact center solutions as well.