Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology. Learn more.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
The CGM LABDAQ Laboratory Information System is a leading system for physician office labs and reference labs. CGM LABDAQ meets the needs of veterinary offices, hospitals, and toxicology labs, too.
Suitable for biotech, industry, academic, and start-up life science labs that value flexibility in the setup of their workflows and lab digitization efforts.
The cumulative report is excellent helps doctors to follow patient progress easily. Also helps to determine if current results jive with previous results.
Number one con, lack of a cancel test workflow. Only having the delete option is extremely frustrating.
I have had excellent conversations with rep. She is helping me with the program and has assured me that she and others will help me all the way through this process.
Some of the management report names are confusing as far as what the report will actually be.
I came from supporting Cerner and Epic and was not expecting CGM to be as good as it is. Support has been very helpful in helping me understand the system.
We did get trained and went over all the steps on how to operate the program, but when it came time to run live samples, we encountered different problems than what we saw in the "practice" run.
Clients are very happy with our report formats and are attracting more accounts.
Trouble transmitting of Microbiology result to EMR.
Our end-users are very happy with the solution and we are receiving positive feedback. The team around Zareh is very knowledgeable about their product but also about the current market and trends.
Since we bought into it, the Journal is stuck in development or asks for additional money for features that should be integrated for molecular biology purposes.
Great customer support and service, this offers an appreciable and competitive value. This software is very good and taking in data, especially as a PDFs.
Frequent users will start to see issues with flexibility in correcting erroneous details of entries (not yet finalized), or setting up high-functioning templates for repeated experiments.
The collaboration is outstanding as any interaction is honest, transparent and direct. I would highly recommend to work with Zareh and his team.
Still no possibility to use a stylus to annotate gel pictures or write entries.
Likewise, the pricing was very competitive and the team at eLab has been very responsive and pleasant to work with.
When being used to paper-based experiments, the investment of time you need to digitalize your experiments in eLabJournal is really high. We miss some Project/Study/Experiment filtering tools.
CGM LABDAQ
eLabNext
Top FeaturesCGM LABDAQ
--
eLabNext
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: