Helping businesses choose
better software since 1999
better software since 1999
Guides & Research
Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing flexibility and functionality, including workflow and policy enforcement, auditing, per diem management, project tracking, and reporting.
Time Tracker by eBillity is a timekeeping and invoicing application designed for teams and individuals to streamline payroll and accounting. Mobile workers can track time from any device, anywhere.
Nevertheless, the strongest asset of the Databasics service is the support team. Their effectiveness and expediency is extraordinary.
As an administrator, I dislike the fact that I no longer have physical custody of the database for other analysis or reporting needs.
Overall TechnoServe has had a great experience with Databasics. Their implementation team was excellent and their customer support has been top notch.
The Jasper reporting system is clunky and sometime our colleagues around the world have trouble accessing it.
I love the reliability and efficiency of DATABASICS Time & Expense. DATABASICS Time & Expense is so accurate and powerful to use.
Sometimes difficult to understand how to make changes in the system.
Very easy for our staff to submit time and expenses. Administrators love this because it is also easy for them to gather the information.
All ad hoc reporting must be done through the embedded Jasper reporting application. This generally meets the needs but is sometimes inconvenient to use.
It does not only apply to your employees only yet it applies to other jobs like doctors and lawyers. This is a great benefit one can use.
TimeTracker's invoice functionality did not meet our needs and the inability to track which time entries were and were not billed was a massive administrative headache for us.
The fact that time can be tracked in real-time from the field, and not just when staff return to the office is very helpful for accurate time-keeping. The customer service offered is outstanding.
Therefore if the user is going to enter non billable time they will always get a confusing error message unless they go to the last item on the mobile app to toggle off billable first.
Great experience and customer support is a huge help if you do need help. They really know how to resolve it fast.
There is not a single thing that I dislike about this software.
It shows exact and reliable reports which help in compensation. Attendance Management is a very important part of the organisation and it smoothly maintains by this software.
I hate that you can't edit text after you submit hours.
Lisa: Hi, I'm Lisa. I'm CEO of 3 Dog Write, and I would give a rating of Time Tracker of five out of five. So before, I wasn't using an actual software system; I was doing what a lot of small businesses or accidental entrepreneurs do, which was using an Excel spreadsheet, and I knew I had to level up with something that would save me time, and would have the reports and accuracy I needed to be able to share that with my clients. So one of the main reasons that I went with Time Tracker is a lot of my clients had been using it, and they gave their own testimonials as to why it worked for them, and then I did a little bit of research, and I saw that it wasn't just a one-off, that the reviews were very unanimous, that it was easy to use, that it was affordable, and that it gave me that professionalism in tracking time, and having reports so that I could share those with my clients. So it was very easy for me to bring it into my organization and to set up Time Tracker. I am the CEO. I'm the one who kind of runs all of those items. It was easy to integrate with QuickBooks. QuickBooks is what we use to bring in the client information into Time Tracker, and the tutorials and the help support within the software itself made setting up and getting used to using it very, very easy and intuitive. So if you're considering using Time Tracker, I want you to think about two different things: number one, if you track your time for your clients, it's an absolute must-have, but even if you don't necessarily track your time for your clients, you can use it in a different way, which is how I also used it, you can track your projects and how long it takes for you to complete a project. If you do a fee project-based model, sometimes you're not quite sure how much time actually is devoted to a certain task or a certain project, and you can actually break that down within the software itself so that you can understand how much time things take, and then you can do your pricing accordingly. Instead of trying to just guess how long something will take, you can look at historical data, and then you're able to really leverage the software under how much you should be charging, and how long you should be budgeting your time to do that project.
Prioritize real-user-identified key features according to your needs to find your best fit.
DATABASICS Time & Expense
Top FeaturesTime Tracker
DATABASICS Time & Expense
--
Talk with a software expert for free. Get a list of software that’s great for you in less than 15 minutes.
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: