Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology. Learn more.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Every developer team who wants to create their software faster and in a safer way!
SonarQube Server is for ALL developers that want to build clean, secure applications, empowering development teams of all sizes to solve code quality and code security issues within their workflows.
Throughout this time the team has taken advantage of the clear interface, ease of use and debugging, and overall I'd say we are satisfied with the results we get.
The main problem that we had as a team were false failures. We often saw that a code change that had no real issues would fail due to something external to the code itself.
CodeShip integration with GitHub is very good and there are many resources allowing users to get started with ease.
We suffered some downtimes that affected a lot our deployments. The plans starts with only one or two parallel deployments, sometimes it's too few.
We successfully ship our code to production multiple times a day thanks to having codeship on our team.
Sometimes it becomes down and prevent builds for a long time. If we have a hurry, it would become problem for our team.
I love how easy it is to get started with a new project in Codeship and that it doesn't require you to clutter your repository with yet another configuration file.
What I dislike most about this service is that it's a bit expensive and they could have a cheaper plan for small companies.
The ability to analyze static code is very useful to improve and maintain software quality. Defining special rules or editing the rules according to your needs provides flexibility.
The setup with CodeCoverage is a nightmare and it seems is not working equallty well all the time.
It also helps our developers to improve their code quality. Coding standards are better now.
It was difficult to use the SonarQube on-premise application. Once we pushed a new code section, the server needed to restart in order for the application to work.
One of the outstanding values about SonarQube is the speed of analysis. It makes it easy to collaborate with other features to generate clean codes.
If any small mistake happens then no result can be seen. We use traditional sonarqube where we install and integrate rather then plugin in jenkins.
Calculate the quality of code and also helps to improve the quality by providing the solution.
Integration with visual studio code and binding with project is tad difficult.
Codeship
SonarQube
Top FeaturesCodeship
--
SonarQube
--
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: