Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology. Learn more.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Every developer team who wants to create their software faster and in a safer way!
Built for all kinds of roles. Insight from bit to boardroom: Sigrid® provides high-level portfolio overviews of code-level violations as well as deep-dive findings.
Throughout this time the team has taken advantage of the clear interface, ease of use and debugging, and overall I'd say we are satisfied with the results we get.
The main problem that we had as a team were false failures. We often saw that a code change that had no real issues would fail due to something external to the code itself.
CodeShip integration with GitHub is very good and there are many resources allowing users to get started with ease.
We suffered some downtimes that affected a lot our deployments. The plans starts with only one or two parallel deployments, sometimes it's too few.
We successfully ship our code to production multiple times a day thanks to having codeship on our team.
Sometimes it becomes down and prevent builds for a long time. If we have a hurry, it would become problem for our team.
I love how easy it is to get started with a new project in Codeship and that it doesn't require you to clutter your repository with yet another configuration file.
What I dislike most about this service is that it's a bit expensive and they could have a cheaper plan for small companies.
It's intuitive and it has a lot of features. We use it both to identify vulnerabilities and for code quality, it's impressive for how many things it can scan the code for.
Unfortunately, detecting component dependencies does not work very well for our PHP Symfony projects because of the framework's dependency injection mechanism.
Good product to improve quality for developers and architects.
It tends to forget your preferences you select on overview pages, which makes it a bit annoying when you navigate back and forth.
Great detection, shows files of interest, gives some suggestions to improve.
One downside was that it felt the comparison of maintainability score of new code (on PR) to baseline wasn’t what we expected.
Overall, a great product for keeping your code quality in check with quantifiable metrics.
Customizability of what is measured and how this works with architecture goals is very low. Immediate feedback for developers missing.
Prioritize real-user-identified key features according to your needs to find your best fit.
Codeship
Sigrid
Top FeaturesCodeship
--
Sigrid
--
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: