Helping businesses choose
better software since 1999
better software since 1999
Guides & Research
Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Software Engineer, Developer, Data Specialist, and Information Technology Developer
Businesses of all types and sizes.
The product and the excellent after sales support helped me to provide a solution to my customer's highest satisfaction - and so am I highly satisfied.
Sometimes it's hard to find a needed functionality.
Especially the support by the Nevron team is outstanding - even for rather specific requests for data visualisation from our side a solution was found in a short time.
My programming activity varies widely; I will go a year or more with absolutely no programming, then end up working on a small project or two.
We first moved to Nevron for it's flexible and beautiful plot renderings. Over time we've come to appreciate how much more we can do with it.
I have not run into any major issues yet. There was some confusion in the purchasing process, but that was quickly clarified.
I liked the aesthetic aspects of your library and the fact that I could try it out as open source first. Also, when I contacted customer service I received excellent support.
I love how simple it is to create charts that are visually interesting using this software. Collaboration is also great with this software.
As I said, the need some coding knowledge for some charts, and I think this is the most missing part of Google Charts. In fact, there is no other missing feature.
Best thing about google charts library is its simple usage and huge community which helps you a lot in fixing issues. Also the UI of charts is very modern and looks good on dashboards.
Has no offline use thus if one has no internet, work can not be saved and bound to be lost easily and have to restart.
Overall, I have a really great experience using google charts. I feel like this software is very user friendly, easy to use and I like to visualization to assemble your data.
For someone who does basic site maintenance and just needs charts for slides, etc, I'm probably not using all the tools available. That is my own failing; nothing against the program.
I am impressed with the simplicity of Google Charts. It is very user friendly as well as it integrates seamlessly with other Google products.
As a proof, it is difficult to make accurate charts, the color bars are automatically defined, the chart layout lacks functions and the axes are limited.
Ganapathy S.: Hello. My name is Ganapathy. I work as a quality manager and I give Google Charts a five out of five rating. For more videos like these, please click on the link below. My primary interest in Google Charts was not just data visualization, but the movement of the graphs themselves as the data evolved from one point of time to the other. And before I hit upon Google Charts, I used Tableau quite a bit to achieve the same effect. I chose Google Charts for two reasons. In no particular order of reason, number one is that it's free and available anywhere on the internet that you would go. Tableau, on the other hand, has to be purchased before use. The second reason is if you are good at a certain amount of coding, which is relatively easy once you get used to the kind of coding Google Charts uses, the capabilities of Google Charts are far above and beyond what Tableau can accomplish, especially for moving the data points within the graph for visualization and motion purposes. Integrating Google Charts into your business when you are collaborating with team members of your own department or across departments is not hard at all. The part about onboarding when you are trying to teach someone how to use Google Charts can be a little more labor intensive, because you have to make sure that when someone reaches a certain point in their expertise, that they need to learn a certain amount of coding to make the visualization more effective. If you haven't tried Google Charts yet, I strongly recommend that you do. And if Google Charts is watching this or the individuals who develop and maintain that software are watching this, this is a pretty please to please bring back the automated graph motion features that were taken away a few years ago which now require coding, but previously did not. But I would strongly recommend everyone who hasn't used or tried Google Charts yet to go right for it.
Prioritize real-user-identified key features according to your needs to find your best fit.
Nevron Vision for .NET
Top FeaturesGoogle Charts
Nevron Vision for .NET
--
Talk with a software expert for free. Get a list of software that’s great for you in less than 15 minutes.
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: