# Miro vs Confluence: Features and Cost Comparison 2026 | Capterra > Miro vs Confluence: Which collaboration tool is right for you? Dive into our detailed comparison of their features, costs, and user experience to make your decision. Source: https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-136446/Miro-vs-Confluence --- # Miro vs Confluence Features and Cost Comparison Last updated April 27th, 2026 Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team.[Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) Your comparison: MiroConfluence2/4 selected [Miro](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/)[4.7 (1684)](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/reviews/) [Confluence](https://www.capterra.com/p/136446/Confluence/)[4.5 (3679)](https://www.capterra.com/p/136446/Confluence/reviews/) [## Miro](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/)[4.7 (1684)](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/reviews/) [## Confluence](https://www.capterra.com/p/136446/Confluence/)[4.5 (3679)](https://www.capterra.com/p/136446/Confluence/reviews/) Starting Price $10.00/month Starting Price $10.00/month Value-for-Money 4.4 Functionality 4.6 Ease of Use 4.5 Customer Service 4.3 Starting Price $5.42/month Starting Price $5.42/month Value-for-Money 4.3 Functionality 4.4 Ease of Use 4.3 Customer Service 4.3 Reviews Sentiment Based on [1,684 reviews](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/reviews/) Positive 1,631 Neutral 48 Negative 5 Positive 1,631 Neutral 48 Negative 5 Reviews Sentiment Based on [3,679 reviews](https://www.capterra.com/p/136446/Confluence/reviews/) Positive 3,399 Neutral 245 Negative 35 Positive 3,399 Neutral 245 Negative 35 Best for (according to reviews) - **Business size**: Small businesses account for 64% of reviews (1,053), showing widespread use among this segment compared to enterprises (21%) and midsize firms (14%). - **Industry**: Information technology, computer software, and marketing/advertising together represent 32% of reviews, indicating broad adoption across tech and creative sectors. - **Use cases**: Idea management (48%), collaboration (45%), and whiteboard (36%) are the main uses, highlighting its focus on team creativity and visual planning. Best for (according to reviews) - **Business size**: Small businesses account for 1,583 reviews, representing 43% of feedback, indicating strong adoption among smaller organizations. - **Industry**: Computer software, IT services, and financial services together contribute 48% of reviews, highlighting significant use in technology-driven sectors. - **Use cases**: Document management (55%), knowledge management (42%), and knowledge base (34%) are key applications, focusing on information organization and sharing. ## Not a match? Find software alternatives tailored to your priorities. These software suggestions are similar to those you’re currently comparing. ### Smartsheet 4.5 (3,502) * * * Starting Price $12.00 Per User,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 92% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * Highest Rated ### Connecteam 4.6 (5,180) * * * Starting Price $29.00 Flat Rate,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 96% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * ### Bitrix24 4.2 (989) * * * Starting Price $69.00 Flat Rate,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 82% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * ### Slack 4.7 (24,098) * * * Starting Price $8.75 Per User,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 96% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * ## Send this comparison chart to my inbox ### Fill out the form and we'll send a list of the top-rated software based on real user reviews directly to your inbox. ## Reviewer verdict Miro Miro users find it best for dynamic, visual collaboration and brainstorming, appreciating its real-time editing, infinite canvas, and digital whiteboard features. Reviewers highlight its usefulness for remote teamwork, project management, and visual task tracking, especially when integrating with tools like Jira, Microsoft Teams, Figma, Slack, and Trello. They value the robust free version for small teams, though some mention limitations in board management and export options for larger projects. Confluence Confluence users consider it ideal for structured documentation, project planning, and organized file sharing, noting its strong integration with Jira, SharePoint, JIRA Service Management, Trello, and draw.io. Reviewers appreciate its administrative control, central repository for documents, and cost-effectiveness for small teams or startups. They mention it is particularly useful for linking documentation with project tasks, though some find its search and editing tools less intuitive. ## Connect with a Capterra advisor for a free 15-minute consultation Get a personalized software list aligned to your business needs with guidance from our expert advisors. Our team has helped 1 million+ businesses like yours find options that fit their needs. ## Features comparison When looking at collaboration tools like Miro and Confluence, price is just one factor to consider. Understanding their features and differences can help determine which one best suits your needs, maximizing efficiency while avoiding unnecessary costs. Here's how they compare in key areas that matter most. \[[1](#source-item-1)\] Key features rated by users Features selected based on 66,828 reviews from Collaboration users. about the Fit Score methodology. Fit Score methodology To calculate the Fit Score, our proprietary methodology factors in the following: - The importance level for each feature. By default, this is determined by user reviews. They can rate a feature Critical, High, Low, or Not Used. - Feedback from real users on how the product performs for each key feature, derived from verified user reviews and ratings. Please note: - To calculate the Fit Score, the number of reviews for those features and the actual rating carry the same weight. You might see that, in some cases, even though the ratings are the same, we still determine a winner because it had more reviews. - If the Fit Score is not shown for a specific product, that only means there are currently not enough relevant data points to develop a meaningful score. It does not indicate that the product should be excluded from further evaluation. Miro 80%Fit Feature ratings Collaboration Tools 4.7 File Sharing 4.3 Task Management 4.3 Mobile Access 4.1 Confluence 80%Fit Feature ratings Collaboration Tools 4.5 File Sharing 4.4 Task Management 4.3 Mobile Access 4.0 Collaboration Tools 4.7 (690) 4.5 (702) Miro users appreciate its robust collaboration tools, highlighting real-time editing, visual presence of team members, and the ability to share and comment on various types of content. They find it particularly useful for brainstorming, project management, and remote teamwork. Confluence users also value its collaboration features, noting the ease of setting permissions, real-time editing, and integration with other tools. However, some users mention issues with real-time visibility of edits. Overall, users find Miro excellent for dynamic, visual collaboration, while they praise Confluence for its administrative control and integration capabilities. File Sharing 4.3 (145) 4.4 (688) Miro users find its file sharing capabilities useful, especially the drag-and-drop feature and the ability to annotate and comment on files directly within the platform. They appreciate the integration with other file storage services but note that the file types supported are somewhat limited. Confluence users value its organized file sharing, the ability to attach files directly to documents, and the integration with other tools. They mention that it simplifies collaboration by keeping documents and discussions in one place. In general, users think Miro offers straightforward file sharing within collaborative boards, while they find Confluence provides a more structured and integrated file sharing experience. Task Management 4.3 (540) 4.3 (557) Miro users appreciate its visual task management features, such as customizable boards, virtual task cards, and templates. They find it useful for assigning tasks, tracking progress, and collaborating in real-time. However, some users feel it is not a dedicated task management tool and prefer other platforms for complex projects. Confluence users value its integration with Jira for task management, the ability to create actionable items within documents, and the transparency it provides. They note that it is more of a documentation tool with task management capabilities. Overall, users find Miro helpful for visual and collaborative task management, while they note Confluence for its integration with Jira and documentation-focused task tracking. Mobile Access 4.1 (80) 4.0 (59) Miro users appreciate the ability to access boards on mobile devices, finding it useful for viewing and referencing content on the go. However, they mention that editing and navigating large boards on small screens can be challenging. Confluence users value the consistent user experience across devices and the ability to access documentation remotely. Some users, however, report issues with the mobile UI and formatting. In summary, users find Miro's mobile access beneficial for quick references, while they appreciate Confluence for its comprehensive mobile access to documentation, despite some UI challenges. ## Pricing comparison ### Starting prices Miro $10.00 Per User (Per Month) Free Trial Free Version [View pricing plans](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/pricing/) Confluence $5.42 Per User (Per Month) Free Trial Free Version [View pricing plans](https://www.capterra.com/p/136446/Confluence/pricing/) ### Value-for-money analysis 4.4 (1684) 4.3 (3679) An exploration of what reviewers say about both Miro's and Confluence's value for money finds that Miro reviewers see it as offering a robust free version with essential features, while Confluence reviewers comment on its cost-effectiveness for small teams and startups. Reviewers find that Miro provides good value for money, especially with its free version that includes multiple functionalities and real-time collaboration. They appreciate the ability to test the software before committing to a paid plan. However, some users mention that the free version has limitations, such as restricted export quality and a three-board limit, which can be a drawback for larger teams or more complex projects. When it comes to Confluence, reviewers appreciate its cost-effectiveness for small teams and the availability of a free plan for up to ten users. They value the flexibility to add plugins for enhanced functionality, although they note that these can add up in cost. Some users indicate that the pricing structure can become expensive for larger teams or when additional features are required, which may not be ideal for organizations with limited budgets. ## Integrations Popular Integrations Compare available integrations between Miro and Confluence. ### Trello Miro Confluence ### Google Drive Miro Confluence ### Slack Miro Confluence ### Jira Miro Confluence ### Evernote Teams Miro Confluence ### GitHub Miro Confluence ### Google Calendar Miro Confluence ### monday.com Miro Confluence Total Integrations 45 Jira Users mention that Miro integrates with Jira for project management and sprint planning, which they say helps in visualizing tasks, creating issue tickets, and organizing strategy sessions. Microsoft Teams Reviewers state that Miro integrates with Microsoft Teams for real-time collaboration during meetings, which they note facilitates brainstorming, project management, and sharing work progress. Figma Users report that Miro integrates with Figma for design collaboration, which they indicate helps in synchronizing designs, presenting screens, and transitioning from brainstorming to detailed documentation. Slack Reviewers mention that Miro integrates with Slack for seamless communication and updates, saying that it helps in staying informed about board changes and streamlining workflow. Trello Users say that Miro integrates with Trello for task management and collaboration, noting that it simplifies capturing actions, brainstorming ideas, and keeping projects on track. Miro Integrations (45) - [Adobe Creative Cloud](https://www.capterra.com/p/48969/Adobe-Creative-Cloud/) - [Adobe XD](https://www.capterra.com/p/168423/Adobe-XD/) - [Airtable](https://www.capterra.com/p/146652/Airtable/) - [Asana](https://www.capterra.com/p/184581/Asana-PM/) - [Axure](https://www.capterra.com/p/18297/Axure-RP/) - [BetterCloud](https://www.capterra.com/p/139333/BetterCloud/) - [Bitium](https://www.capterra.com/p/133412/Bitium/) - [Box](https://www.capterra.com/p/148766/Box/) - [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.com/p/158833/ClickUp/) - [Coda](https://www.capterra.com/p/193164/Coda/) - [Confluence](https://www.capterra.com/p/136446/Confluence/) - [Dialpad AI Meetings](https://www.capterra.com/p/157843/UberConference/) - [Evernote Teams](https://www.capterra.com/p/154969/Evernote-Business/) - [Figma](https://www.capterra.com/p/175027/Figma/) - [Freshdesk](https://www.capterra.com/p/124981/Freshdesk/) - [GitHub](https://www.capterra.com/p/129067/GitHub/) - [Google Calendar](https://www.capterra.com/p/213340/Google-Calendar/) - [Google Drive](https://www.capterra.com/p/161425/Drive/) - [inVision](https://www.capterra.com/p/214840/inVision/) - [Jira](https://www.capterra.com/p/19319/JIRA/) - [Livestorm](https://www.capterra.com/p/153937/Livestorm/) - [Marvel](https://www.capterra.com/p/171098/Marvel/) - [Microsoft Teams](https://www.capterra.com/p/168668/Microsoft-Teams/) - [monday.com](https://www.capterra.com/p/147657/monday-com/) - [Notion](https://www.capterra.com/p/186596/Notion/) - [Okta](https://www.capterra.com/p/119653/Okta/) - [OneDrive](https://www.capterra.com/p/161304/OneDrive/) - [Prezi](https://www.capterra.com/p/140325/Prezi-Business/) - [Procore](https://www.capterra.com/p/56250/Procore/) - [Productiv](https://www.capterra.com/p/196087/Productiv/) - [RemoteHQ](https://www.capterra.com/p/205188/RemoteHQ/) - [Slab](https://www.capterra.com/p/184289/Slab/) - [Slack](https://www.capterra.com/p/135003/Slack/) - [SlideShare](https://www.capterra.com/p/214044/SlideShare/) - [SurveyMonkey](https://www.capterra.com/p/253516/SurveyMonkey/) - [Trello](https://www.capterra.com/p/211559/Trello/) - [Typeform](https://www.capterra.com/p/137289/Typeform/) - [UXPin](https://www.capterra.com/p/145722/UXPin/) - [Webex Suite](https://www.capterra.com/p/237272/Webex/) - [Whereby](https://www.capterra.com/p/182733/appear-in/) - [Zapier](https://www.capterra.com/p/130182/Zapier/) - [Zendesk Suite](https://www.capterra.com/p/164283/Zendesk/) - [Zluri](https://www.capterra.com/p/215002/Zluri/) - [Zoom Workplace](https://www.capterra.com/p/144037/Zoom-Video-Conferencing/) - [Zylo](https://www.capterra.com/p/173251/Zylo/) Total Integrations 21 Jira Reviewers mention that Confluence integrates seamlessly with Jira for project and task management, which they say helps in linking documentation with Jira tasks, enhancing project tracking and collaboration. Microsoft SharePoint Reviewers state that Confluence is used alongside SharePoint for document management and collaboration, noting that Confluence offers better integration with other tools and a more user-friendly interface. JIRA Service Management Reviewers report that Confluence integrates with JIRA Service Management for knowledge base management and ticketing, which they say improves project collaboration and customer service. Trello Users say that Confluence integrates with Trello for project management, which they note helps in linking documents and tasks, enhancing workflow and team collaboration. draw.io Users mention that Confluence integrates with draw.io for embedding diagrams, which they indicate is useful for creating and sharing technical designs and project documentation. Confluence Integrations (21) - [Balsamiq](https://www.capterra.com/p/145723/Balsamiq-Mockups/) - [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.com/p/233341/Bitbucket/) - [Docusign](https://www.capterra.com/p/121506/Docusign/) - [draw.io](https://www.capterra.com/p/166985/draw-io/) - [Evernote Teams](https://www.capterra.com/p/154969/Evernote-Business/) - [GitHub](https://www.capterra.com/p/129067/GitHub/) - [Gliffy](https://www.capterra.com/p/145714/Gliffy/) - [Google Calendar](https://www.capterra.com/p/213340/Google-Calendar/) - [Google Drive](https://www.capterra.com/p/161425/Drive/) - [Google Maps](https://www.capterra.com/p/227511/Google-Maps/) - [Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.com/p/247901/Google-Workspace/) - [Jira](https://www.capterra.com/p/19319/JIRA/) - [JIRA Service Management](https://www.capterra.com/p/227102/JIRA-Service-Management/) - [Lucidchart](https://www.capterra.com/p/146136/Lucidchart/) - [Microsoft OneNote](https://www.capterra.com/p/227211/Microsoft-OneNote/) - [Microsoft Outlook](https://www.capterra.com/p/227138/Microsoft-Outlook/) - [Microsoft SharePoint](https://www.capterra.com/p/1167/SharePoint/) - [Miro](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/) - [Rewind](https://www.capterra.com/p/168921/Rewind-Backups/) - [Slack](https://www.capterra.com/p/135003/Slack/) - [Trello](https://www.capterra.com/p/211559/Trello/) For each product, we show you the most common integrations according to our user reviews and analyze themes in what reviewers say to highlight what you need to know. ## How does the user experience compare on Miro vs Confluence? ### Overall rating 4.7 (1684) 4.5 (3679) ### User interface Miro Confluence ### Customer service and support Miro Email/Help Desk FAQs/Forum Knowledge Base Phone Support 24/7 (Live rep) Chat Confluence Email/Help Desk FAQs/Forum Knowledge Base Phone Support 24/7 (Live rep) Chat ## What users say about the pros and cons of Miro vs Confluence Miro and Confluence are two software tools that have been evaluated and reviewed on Capterra by verified reviewers. Read genuine feedback from users to see how Miro compares to Confluence and decide which one is the best fit for your needs. Users appreciate Miro for its robust team collaboration features, noting real-time tools like live cursors and commenting that enhance teamwork. They also value Miro's effectiveness in idea brainstorming, highlighting its infinite canvas and visual workspace. Additionally, reviewers find the digital whiteboard feature essential for remote teams, praising its variety of templates and real-time interaction. At the same time, Confluence users commend its team collaboration capabilities, citing real-time co-editing and version control. They also appreciate its documentation management, noting its central repository for project plans and meeting notes, and its organized document management, which boosts productivity. As for the cons, Miro users mention issues with board management, such as slow loading times and cluttered boards. They also find the navigation experience to be less intuitive and criticize the pricing as being on the higher side. Meanwhile, Confluence users highlight the search functionality as lacking, making it difficult to find specific content. They also find page creation cumbersome, especially when multiple users are involved, and criticize the editing tools for being less user-friendly compared to other alternatives. \[[2](#source-item-2)\] Pros Miro OR Orest R Sales managerChemicals, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “It does have it’s disadvantages, such as the limit on dashboards and the small number of free templates, but it also has many advantages that make virtual teamwork easier and faster. Once you get the hang of it, it becomes a very useful and even fun tool!“ March 15, 2026 SB Sakshi B Business Intelligence AnalystOil & Energy, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “Miro supports collaboration with colleagues easily as it allows multiple users to work on the same board at the same time as all the changes are synced in real time in the cloud“ August 26, 2025 Confluence Hadi B Product CoordinatorE-Learning, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “In addition, Confluence has great collaboration features, such as inline comments, version history, and page permissions; therefore, teams can collaborate on content without losing control of it.“ April 23, 2026 AR Anitha R Senior Technical SpecialistFinancial Services, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “I particularly appreciate the ability to create standardised page templates, as this helps maintain consistency across procedures, meeting notes and technical documents.“ February 9, 2026 Cons Miro MB Matt B Senior Application Solution AnalystNon-Profit Organization Management, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “The main downsides are that structured diagrams don’t export in a useful hierarchy, overlapping items can be painful to work with because of the layers, and it would be better if you could add more detail to items without cluttering the board.“ January 4, 2026 Nicole G Senior Insurance AgentInsurance, Self-employedUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “It could get laggy with lots of users on the file, sometimes we would have trouble locating specific parts of the project because there were too many details in one screen.“ March 16, 2026 Confluence Enguerran M Fullstack web developerSporting Goods, 5,001 - 10,000 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “The page editor software becomes difficult to use when users try to create complex page designs that include multiple levels of table structures which leads to formatting problems.“ April 23, 2026 RV Rakhi V QAInformation Technology and Services, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “Page management also becomes harder to maintain over time as spaces grow, and without strict team discipline around naming and organization, things can get messy and hard to navigate quickly.“ April 20, 2026 * * * Sources 1. Our research team identified features from vendor websites based on their analysis of what users find valuable or expect from collaboration software. This list is not exhaustive. For additional features, refer to the vendor’s website. 2. Review excerpts are passages extracted from longer reviews written by verified reviewers. We obtain these excerpts by applying an algorithm that considers factors including, but not limited to, length, topic coverage, and thematic relevance. Excerpts are evaluated for positive or negative sentiment and receive a sentiment score. They represent user opinion and do not represent the views of, nor constitute, an endorsement by Capterra or its affiliates. Excerpts are not edited for clarity or grammar. * * * Need Help Deciding Between Miro and Confluence? Talk to a Capterra advisor for free and get results within 15 minutes. Popular comparisons - [Miro vs Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-247901/Miro-vs-Google-Workspace) - [Miro vs Slack](https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-135003/Miro-vs-Slack) - [Miro vs Zoom Workplace](https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-144037/Miro-vs-Zoom-Video-Conferencing) - [Miro vs Asana](https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-184581/Miro-vs-Asana-PM) - [Miro vs Trello](https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-211559/Miro-vs-Trello) - [Confluence vs Google Drive](https://www.capterra.com/compare/136446-161425/Confluence-vs-Drive) - [Confluence vs Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.com/compare/136446-247901/Confluence-vs-Google-Workspace) - [Confluence vs OneDrive](https://www.capterra.com/compare/136446-161304/Confluence-vs-OneDrive) - [Confluence vs Microsoft 365](https://www.capterra.com/compare/136446-227157/Confluence-vs-Microsoft-365) - [Confluence vs monday.com](https://www.capterra.com/compare/136446-147657/Confluence-vs-monday-com)