Survicate vs Survey Solutions: Which is a better fit?

The UI is amazing, super easy to understand and the AI to create new surveys is an interesting new feature.

I had some feedback on some features but it looks like they might take some time to implement them. Also, the fact that you loose you can't pool a report from all the surveys together is not ideal.

Survicate effectively solves our survey automation needs. We required a solution that could seamlessly integrate with our ESP and offer in-app survey capabilities, and Survicate delivers perfectly.

We had 0 pain points with Survicate once it was up and running and integrated into our systems.

Really good, allows us to greater understand our customers and their pains and how we can solve them.

I believe this situation should be handled differently, considering we are legacy clients. While some incremental changes may be reasonable, it feels unfair to compel us to upgrade in this manner.

We had a wonderful experience with Survicate from start to finish. We really enjoyed the customization and ability to record partial responses.

Survicate is more limited and question options, quota design and analysis dashboard than similar vendors.

The survey solution really helps in designing the better questionnaire and collecting the good quality data and it is convenient for the interviewers while doing the data collection compared to PAPI.

No backup in the main server in case of data loss from the individual servers. No Space for instruction at the beginning of the survey.

Collaboration: ability to simultaneously work in the same questionnaire is great for collaboration across countries, very useful during design phase.

It should develop more functions on analyses of interview paradata to find and anti cheat of interviewers.

Mihai M

CEO

It is important to know that it is much cheaper than other know operators and the work is as good or even better.

Asmelash A

Survey Specialist

Highly dependence on Internet connection. Need for offline programing and data backup (specially in some African countries the internet infrastructure is poor).

Mostly great documentation of functionality and features. A polished, robust, well thought-out product, which a team behind it that seems to really care about delivering the highest quality.

When it comes to the validation part its quite difficult difficult as i am not that much familiar with the c sharp.