Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Companies of all sizes, looking for database management software
MongoDB serves both startups and industry-leading organizations from Fortune 500 companies to government agencies.
I have had a good experience with SQL Server as it has proven itself to be reliable, secure and efficient.
The least thing i found about the software is error statement , some times an extra space can cause a huge problem , and throwing the error which is not likely understandable.
Overall I had an amazing experience. It is very powerful and useful for scalable enterprises.
The lack of reporting services is a terrible shortage. It could have an alternative in Apache, or even allow integration with Windows servers for this demand.
What I like most about SQL for Linux is the possibility to reduce this cost drastically, with an amazing OS and extremely stable SQL in this environment.
Pricing is quite confusing and costly, and performance can be sluggish at times when dealing with low RAM.
It is best database software to support as back end for all the RPA product like Automation Anywhere and UiPath. It is best database for configuration and support as back end.
Licensing is confusing, whenever you have license by call or by CPU core, it's a bit hard to understand how they apply the prices.
This product is best suitable for nosql document database. They provide good management tool like atlas and good documentation.
This is not possible and even worse, when you switch between collections, thee state is completely reset.
It is best for NoSql databases. It have a great documentation which helps in getting started with MongoDB.
After signing up for the trial, I received multiple emails which I promptly ignored, as I had no intention in talking with their sales associate.
It's extremely easy to pick up on as it's basically just JSON documents. It's fun and exciting when compared with common relational databases.
The initial setup of MongoDB and specifically the Mongod can be quite confusing.
Super easy to install and start working with it. A great start for prototyping a project or if you need to do an enormous amount of inserts.
Not to mention the software has evolved to include features sorely missing awhile back.
Lew N.: Hi, my name is Lew, I am the Director of Information Technology for Young's Plant Farm. We're an annual and perennial grower supplier for big box retail stores, and I give Microsoft SQL Server a five out of five review. Okay. We chose SQL Server as we shifted away from some of the more mid-range systems that had built-in databases and we also looked at IBM DB2 and we just were very happy with the interface and how well Microsoft SQL Server ported across all of our different servers and applications. The primary reason the value-added reseller that provides the vertical system for growers uses a SQL Server database as its primary database, so we were familiar with SQL for that. As we were shifting into the data warehousing mode and developing our own internal data warehouse, we chose to use the same platform because we were familiar with it and we liked the way it worked, and we knew it was powerful. As with Microsoft products, the installs and the look and fill of the product are pretty much the same across all of their suite of products. SQL Server was very simple to install, didn't really have any licensing issues or anything like that, so we got it up and running. As far as the installation for our data warehouse, we just started creating tables and setting it up the way we needed and morphed and adjusted and enhanced from there. Just getting started was very simple, and from there, we have launched it into the powerful tool that has become for us. If you're looking at a database platform to do your own in-house data warehouse and your own application development, linking with other Microsoft Power, BI power apps, products like that, SQL Server is definitely the product to go with. It is easy to set up, very secure, and very portable to other platforms, very interfaceable to other platforms.
Speaker 1: Hey, I'm Greg. I am an operations fellow at an entrepreneurship center. And I give MongoDB a four out of five. So we switched from Google Sheets, we were using it to store a lot of our membership data, but we found that it was just too unorganized and it wasn't able to handle the amount of data we were processing. We chose MongoDB for a variety of reasons, the primary one is that our staff rotates pretty frequently just as a part of the program and MongoDB is really easy to learn and understand. It's customer friendly for developers, but also it is able to be used by people who don't necessarily have database experience. We found MongoDB to be pretty easy to integrate with our apps. And while there are other services out there that provide similar functionality, the free tier on MongoDB was really a benefit to us and provided us with enough support to get started on the platform, but allows us to grow if we need it in the future. MongoDB was relatively easy to integrate with our system. We were lucky in that we were overhauling a lot of our backend data processing stuff anyways. So MongoDB was just one extra step to add on top of our existing code base. It was relatively easy to add different models and different ways of storing data. And we found that compared to things like SQL that may have a higher learning curve, because MongoDB's very user-friendly experience, we were able to do so without much time committed to learning, which as I mentioned earlier is really great given how often our staff rotates. So it really made the whole process a lot easier and it was one less thing that we had to think about as we were shifting away from our old model. So if you're thinking about trying out MongoDB for your business or service or project, I'd recommend messing around with their playground option. Their free tier is more than enough for a lot of smaller projects and it gives you a chance to learn MongoDB, all the ins and outs and see how easy it is to integrate into your system. I had some questions that were quickly answered through their online programs. But more than that, just being able to use it in my own application, just trying it out. That said, if you are considering MongoDB, look at Google Firebase as well. They have a database, I think it's called Firestore, as a part of the Firebase platform as a whole, but it integrates really nicely with all of the other Google services that are part of the Firebase platform. And what's on top of that, it still uses the same database structure and that all objects are stored as JSON objects. But it integrates with all of their other services pretty well.
Prioritize real-user-identified key features according to your needs to find your best fit.
Microsoft SQL Server
MongoDB
Top FeaturesProducts similar to those you're currently comparing: