Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology. Learn more.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Not provided by vendor
eCommerce businesses and websites with lots of images
Using AEM from 2 years and its pretty good CMS tool.customer service is really great and they are pretty quick and knowledgeable. I have also attended the adobe training which is also good to have.
The company I am with now uses AEM, and anytime I get frustrated with not understanding how to do something, I remind myself of the alternative.
This is great and offers a lot of flexibility in creating exactly what we what. There are a lot of validating and math functions that makes this a useful tool.
Difficult at the beginning if you have no knowledge, you'll often have to figure out on your own and spend hours learning something. And also it can be a bit pricey for some small companies.
Overall, AEM is a very powerful platform and probably the best one out there for building enterprise level responsive sites.
I dislike the complexity of workflows for doing so many things, from setting up locals and translations, to editing headless components.
The flexibility that we get with AEM is great. The types of template and pages options that we get provide us with great features to be able to build custom content and pages well.
The program has a habit of producing errors when utilizing Windows 10 OS, which can be a nuisance when in the midst of work.
It wa super easy to use and the spins were created automatically- and they look amazing. Plus it's a good image hosting site.
Also, I get multiple errors for every page that doesn't have Sirv picture. The console for over 4k parts shows this error twice.
It has servers all over the world providing really fast access to the files. Important to mention that it has all the great capabilities of the giants of the industry but with a competitive price.
The lazy load could work diferent, the lazy load today give a inpression that there are no more images to show.
Not only are they happy to help me and very generous with their time, but they also see the bigger picture and are happy to help my customers too.
Again, my concerns about the limited functions were met with specific and detailed conversations about ways to meet customer demands.
It makes it very easy to improve your ability to serve brilliant imagery to your customers, its integration and setup was a dream.
Then sirv crushes the files to deliver the 360. Although they don't charge for their created files there should be an option to only keep their files so you don't have to go on higher priced teirs.
Andrew: Hi, my name is Andrew. I'm an SEO Manager. I would give Adobe Experience Manager a four out of five. For more reviews like this, see below. After using other content management systems at previous organizations, I gained a new appreciation for how many features and how many ways of working with Adobe Experience Manager there are. And it gave me a real appreciation for the platform. My organization chose to use Adobe Experience Manager because it is considered a leader in the industry. And because it has many features and its ability to be customized for the organization. The one downside of Adobe Experience Manager is that it does take a while to ramp up. Implementation is on the more difficult side, so a more senior development team is needed to really expedite the process of onboarding it. For an organization looking at content management systems and considering Adobe Experience Manager, I would encourage them to look at what features are important to their organization. Adobe Experience Manager's an excellent platform, but it's not for every organization. So a real thorough examination of the features needs to be looked at.
Ash: Hi. My name is Ash. I'm a student right now, and I would rate Sirv five stars. It's awesome. For more reviews like this, click below. Before Sirv, we were using CDNs of Amazon, and things like that, but they were not working because they didn't have options such as 360 degree photos and combining all the photos to present it in our software. So the number reason is Sirv is highly optimized for delivering images to our applications websites. Second, it has great interactive options, it does 360 degrees photo of a product. And the final reason is that it's super easy to use and set up, for in the next 10 minutes you can be ready and you can go. It's very easy, even if you are a beginner with some sort of a photo CDN or image CDN. I would say on a scale of one to 10, like 10 being extremely hard, it's three. It's very easy. There's not much to learn about it. The buttons are super easy to understand. UI is great. The best recommendation I can give is that, try out Sirv. It's free to try out. And if you think that you need more features, you can always upgrade. They do have some fair amount of storage available for beginners, and try giving it a shot. Apart from the [inaudible 00:01:24], it's a great software, in my opinion.
Adobe Experience Manager
Top FeaturesSirv
Adobe Experience Manager
--
Talk with a software expert for free. Get a list of software that’s great for you in less than 15 minutes.
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: