Corrigo vs The Asset Guardian (TAG): Which is a better fit?

The thing I like the most is the freedom I have to make changes within the system. I appreciate the extensive the reporting features and the capabilities to export to different formats.

Corrigo will pick it up and work with that date , the same issue if an email was input wrong in MRI then Corrigo will receive the wrong email.

The Appearance and ease of use make it pleasurable to use, because all navigation controls are visible, clear and accessible.

The only con I can think of is that if you input some information wrong in MRI.

I don't know if the company will allow this in the review, but my rep has given me fantastic help whenever I've needed it and she is the primary reason why I am a Corrigo customer.

The program has several drawbacks, with the biggest being its very poor search function.

Good application with good user experience, also the user interface is good. This is a great product if you don't want to customize.

Now we can oversee every service call for every property we have (currently 110 locations) , we can now also actually pay our vendors on time.

Having prior knowledge if the ERP software arena and how strong Microsoft was with NAV/BC the seamless addition of TAG for CMMS as a service was perfect.

Inability to create more than one PWO for recurring tasks (must complete first one to generate the next one).

We love how easy it is to use and we had buy in from all of our end users because of how easy and quick it is to get what you.

Above & Beyond - Tool to Cut Down Unnecessary Costs resulting from Reactive Maintenance.

TAG has given Garner Industries a great way to track the activates of our Maintenance Department and to schedule out our technicians time throughout the day.

TAG is also a common place for our technicians to document equipment problems, conditions and any preventive maintenance performed for all to see.

Perfect integration with Microsoft Dynamic NAV.