AMCS Field Services vs FSI CMMS: Which is a better fit?

My overall experience is very positive. I love having to have all info right there for anyone.

All information has Federal, State and Local compliance requirements. Prior to the use of the software we were always in jeopardy of missing something.

It is a easy to use system and we have some employees that are not very computer savvy so it's good for them.

Sometimes its hard to change things in the map mode, maybe having a construction option to change things and see how they go and be able to go back if there was a problem.

What I like most about the software that it serves a purpose and it organizes all of the companies assets.

However, I think it is inevitable that the pace of their improvements will frustrate an occasional user or two.

Overall I’ve had great quality and a easy time. The work order system we use is very manageable.

The biggest issue would be that the users lose some functionality when using the program in offline mode.

Outstanding continued support is one of their strongest points, and their staff members are focused on helping hospitals make these tricky transitions.

The downtimes with the parent server can lead to loss of time.

The product is outstanding and easy to work with for users. The people behind the product are exceptional, and make each customer feel important.

Sometimes things appear to go missing and we're not sure why. We think something works one way but it doesn't and then it doesn't make sense.

Ve worked with FSI CMMS being implemented at a few clients from conception to rollout and the staff has been great and seeing the evolution of the program has been amazing.

The common problem doesn’t let us assign techs in that settings.

They have a great team that is very supportive. There is no Question they can not answer.

On occasion, more granular reporting on individual hospitals within the system was sometimes difficult to obtain.