Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology. Learn more.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Mode is the modern business intelligence platform that unites data teams with business teams to build analytics that drive business outcomes.
Designed for firms in construction, environmental, engineering and other industries. The software helps report writers streamline processes and leadership to use analytics to make informed decisions.
Also is good subscription by email (or other methods) and great to use python to create some sophisticated analysis.
Right now, Mode can only send on a schedule... but many of our needs are warning systems (if X<=0 then send an alert to this team).
Very easy to use, set up and organize. Their charting and reporting tools are super powerful, and generate great dashboards and reports.
There is an issue with PDF exporting cutting off tables and visualizations and i have been asking for it to be fixed for almost a month now and no one has fixed it.
Mode clearly cares about the success of their users with their product and it’s shown in the features of the offer and the support that they have.
Organizing reports was hard to manage, and we had many legacy reports from past colleagues that had no context unless the user opened the report, which became time consuming.
Moreover, it's very simple to create charts and diagrams from the data to generate nice presentations / reports. By the way you have a nice integration with Python/R notebooks.
Sometimes queries fail or it takes time to refresh a dash.
Since implementation, support has been outstanding. I really like the seamless integration of data report providers, map making tool and site photos tool.
I can't think of a single day where I have been mad or upset about using Quire.
It has been one of the best platforms we have invested in to help make our proposals and reports a better product.
The current presentation of "Source > Target" to me feels a little confusing compared to all of the other easy-to-use features.
I love the ease of compiling the information in one place and it creating a beautiful report.
I sometimes experience errors when tracking changes.
My favorite features of Quire are the mobile app and ability to label photos from the field and the amazing help staff available when needed.
As it is web-based, it is possible to have some lag and saving issued wen the internet is a bit slow.
Rohan V.: My name is Rohan. I'm a software engineer at Lyft. And I use Mode Report just for general analytics to understand our data better. And I would give it a rating of a five. I use Mode report at Lyft for different data purposes. It might be for visualizations to better understand our data sets and to be able to get better visibility into the data that we have to understand it. At a higher level, it may be to be able to generate reports, to be able to share with other stakeholders in order for us to be able to better inform them on the data that we do have. Or it may be to even just do playground reporting. Just like being able to investigate data on an ad hoc basis to be able to figure out something on the fly. For all these different purposes, Mode report has been very helpful. I would say that the biggest thing that I like about Mode is just how easy it is to use and how nice it looks. I think the combination of both makes it a very accessible platform to be able to do anything of the use cases that I mentioned before. The fact that visually it has a lot of customization aspects to it, to be able to make it feel how you want it to. And then the fact that all the features are very self-evident, very well documented, and usually pretty intuitive to be able to look at and understand how to interact with it makes it a very engaging solver to use. The two things that I suppose has the most room for growth with regards to Mode that I dislike at the moment is the use of the collections feature and the UI for being able to navigate different data sources. For a collections, being able to organize by maybe teams or purposes is an important feature that I think should definitely be there. But I think the way that I'm navigating it feels not as fluid and not as smooth as the other aspect of Mode. It feels very ad hoc, search driven. Instead of being able to view the collections as a whole, I have to explicitly find it, which only comes from having the pre-knowledge that it exists. And for the data sources, having different engines or different data sources to be able to query data on when I'm using the Python notebooks, or being able to use the data to actually get the sets from, it tends to not have much information about its availability, about if it's actually able to be used with the table in reference. And that tends to mean that you have to have, again, a lot of pre-knowledge on the actual data that you're using to be able to know if the query engine would work for it.
Prioritize real-user-identified key features according to your needs to find your best fit.
Mode
Quire
Top FeaturesMode
--
Quire
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: