Square 9 vs Nanonets: Which is a better fit?

From implementation to completion, it was apparent that our satisfaction was Square 9's top priority. I'm happy to report that they earned us as a satisfied customer.

Reduction of physically stored paperwork as well as a reduction in lost paperwork.

I like that Square 9 can not only store our documents and separate them into convenient archive folders, but we also appreciate that it handles all of our approval workflow processes.

Training can be outdated and sometimes answers can be flat out wrong on quizzes.

Ease of use, reliability. I like how easy it is to search for documents and to export files.

The one drawback to Square 9 is the delay in downloading. It seems to lag a bit at times.

Super happy with our implementation so far. We're just getting into things now.

Not easy to set up user's permissions, problems installing Extensions for some users.

Neha N

Finance

Overall, I had a great experience with Nanonets. I used it just for trials as I was curious but then I was amazed to see the results.

kapil k

Associate Engineer

Our problem areas were too much time consumption and payment delays. Both of these problems were resolved with prompt data extraction from invoices and data organisation into tables.

Within minutes I had the results I expected. Very pleased with how easy and useful it is.

I didn't find any reason to dislike the platform.

The overall experience, in one word, was amazing. The accuracy with which the application returned the details was worth the experiment.

Sometimes it just stops working suddenly. Not facing these issues for some time.

The document detection is seamless and comes with simplicity. It is probably one of the best in the industry.

Once we customized the export with Nanonets it only takes a few short minutes daily to process. Once this is out of pilot, we will fully automate with no human touch needed.