# Microsoft Teams vs Microsoft Viva Engage: Features and Cost Comparison 2026 | Capterra > Microsoft Teams vs Microsoft Viva Engage: Which team communication tool is right for you? Dive into our detailed comparison of their features, costs, and user experience to make your decision. Source: https://www.capterra.com/compare/168668-227175/Microsoft-Teams-vs-Yammer --- # Microsoft Teams vs Microsoft Viva Engage Features and Cost Comparison Last updated April 13th, 2026 Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team.[Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) Your comparison: Microsoft TeamsMicrosoft Viva Engage2/4 selected [Microsoft Teams](https://www.capterra.com/p/168668/Microsoft-Teams/)[4.5 (11019)](https://www.capterra.com/p/168668/Microsoft-Teams/reviews/) [Microsoft Viva Engage](https://www.capterra.com/p/227175/Yammer/)[4.2 (819)](https://www.capterra.com/p/227175/Yammer/reviews/) [## Microsoft Teams](https://www.capterra.com/p/168668/Microsoft-Teams/)[4.5 (11019)](https://www.capterra.com/p/168668/Microsoft-Teams/reviews/) [## Microsoft Viva Engage](https://www.capterra.com/p/227175/Yammer/)[4.2 (819)](https://www.capterra.com/p/227175/Yammer/reviews/) Starting Price $4.00/month Starting Price $4.00/month Value-for-Money 4.4 Functionality 4.4 Ease of Use 4.4 Customer Service 4.2 Starting Price $8.00/month Starting Price $8.00/month Value-for-Money 4.2 Functionality 4.1 Ease of Use 4.3 Customer Service 4.2 Reviews Sentiment Based on [11,019 reviews](https://www.capterra.com/p/168668/Microsoft-Teams/reviews/) Positive 9,961 Neutral 859 Negative 199 Positive 9,961 Neutral 859 Negative 199 Reviews Sentiment Based on [819 reviews](https://www.capterra.com/p/227175/Yammer/reviews/) Positive 667 Neutral 119 Negative 33 Positive 667 Neutral 119 Negative 33 Best for (according to reviews) - **Business size**: Small businesses account for 50% of reviews (5,388), with enterprises and midsize businesses contributing 31% and 18%, demonstrating broad uptake across various organization sizes. - **Industry**: Information technology, computer software, and education management together represent 23% of reviews, indicating diverse adoption across tech and educational sectors. - **Use cases**: Meeting (69%), team communication (57%), and video conferencing (45%) are prominent, reflecting strong focus on collaboration and remote interaction. Best for (according to reviews) - **Business size**: Enterprise organizations account for 385 reviews (47%), indicating strong adoption, followed by small businesses (29%) and midsize businesses (17%). - **Industry**: Information technology and services, computer software, and hospital & health care together represent 24% of reviews, showing diverse industry interest. - **Use cases**: Community (47%), social networking (46%), and employee engagement (34%) are the main focuses, supporting internal collaboration and connectivity. ## Not a match? Find software alternatives tailored to your priorities. These software suggestions are similar to those you’re currently comparing. ### Wrike 4.4 (2,988) * * * Starting Price $10.00 Per User,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 89% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * ### monday.com 4.6 (6,035) * * * Starting Price $9.00 Per User,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 94% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * ### Asana 4.5 (13,571) * * * Starting Price $10.99 Per User,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 92% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * Highest Rated ### Connecteam 4.6 (5,203) * * * Starting Price $29.00 Flat Rate,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 96% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * ## Send this comparison chart to my inbox ### Fill out the form and we'll send a list of the top-rated software based on real user reviews directly to your inbox. ## Reviewer verdict Microsoft Teams Reviewers find Microsoft Teams best for real-time team communication, collaborative file sharing, and efficient online meetings, citing its integration with Microsoft tools like SharePoint, Excel, and OneNote. Users value its customizable notifications, mobile access, and cost-effectiveness within Office 365, though they mention occasional chat and video call issues. Microsoft Viva Engage Microsoft Viva Engage users see it as ideal for fostering organizational connectivity, internal discussions, and social networking, appreciating its integration with Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, and Microsoft 365. Reviewers highlight its affordability and mobile accessibility, while noting challenges with notification overload and post organization. ## Features comparison Choosing a team communication solution like Microsoft Teams or Microsoft Viva Engage involves more than just comparing prices. Evaluating the features and capabilities of each option is key to finding the right fit. Selecting a solution that integrates well with your needs can improve efficiency and prevent spending on features you don't require. Here's how these two options measure up in key areas. \[[1](#source-item-1)\] Key features rated by users Features selected based on 53,632 reviews from Team Communication users. about the Fit Score methodology. Fit Score methodology To calculate the Fit Score, our proprietary methodology factors in the following: - The importance level for each feature. By default, this is determined by user reviews. They can rate a feature Critical, High, Low, or Not Used. - Feedback from real users on how the product performs for each key feature, derived from verified user reviews and ratings. Please note: - To calculate the Fit Score, the number of reviews for those features and the actual rating carry the same weight. You might see that, in some cases, even though the ratings are the same, we still determine a winner because it had more reviews. - If the Fit Score is not shown for a specific product, that only means there are currently not enough relevant data points to develop a meaningful score. It does not indicate that the product should be excluded from further evaluation. Microsoft Teams 88%Fit Feature ratings Real-Time Chat 4.7 Mobile Access 4.4 Alerts/Notifications 4.3 File Sharing 4.4 Microsoft Viva Engage 79%Fit Feature ratings Real-Time Chat 4.4 Mobile Access 4.5 Alerts/Notifications 4.3 File Sharing 4.4 Real-Time Chat 4.7 (2191) 4.4 (127) Microsoft Teams users appreciate the real-time chat feature for its immediacy and efficiency, saying that it allows quick responses and seamless communication. They find it essential for remote and hybrid teams, noting its reliability and the ability to integrate with other tools. However, some users mention occasional delays in message delivery and interface issues. Microsoft Viva Engage users, on the other hand, see it more as a social networking tool within the organization rather than a primary chat platform. They value its ability to facilitate discussions and debates but note that it lacks the immediacy and integration of dedicated chat tools. In summary, users find Microsoft Teams' real-time chat crucial for efficient communication, while they use Microsoft Viva Engage more for social interactions and discussions. Mobile Access 4.4 (2475) 4.5 (130) Microsoft Teams users value the mobile access feature for its flexibility and functionality, saying that it allows them to stay connected and productive on the go. They appreciate the ability to join meetings, respond to messages, and access files from their mobile devices, although some mention occasional slowness and navigation issues. Microsoft Viva Engage users also find mobile access beneficial, especially for staying updated with notifications and posts. They note that the mobile app works well but is not as user-friendly as the desktop version. Overall, users find both platforms offer valuable mobile access, with Microsoft Teams providing extensive functionality and Microsoft Viva Engage offering ease of use for staying connected. Alerts/Notifications 4.3 (1034) 4.3 (130) Microsoft Teams users appreciate the customizable alerts and notifications, which they say help them stay informed and responsive. They find the ability to tailor notifications to their needs useful, although some mention occasional bugs and excessive alerts. Microsoft Viva Engage users also value the notification system, highlighting its integration with email and the ability to manage alerts for specific posts or groups. However, some users find the notifications overwhelming and difficult to manage. In general, users think both platforms offer effective alert systems, with Microsoft Teams providing more customization options and Microsoft Viva Engage integrating well with email. File Sharing 4.4 (1862) 4.4 (121) Microsoft Teams users find the file sharing feature essential for collaboration, appreciating the ability to share and co-author documents in real-time. They value the integration with other Microsoft products and the ease of accessing shared files, though some mention issues with file compatibility and organization. Microsoft Viva Engage users also find file sharing useful, particularly for sharing smaller files and images within the community. They note that while it is not their primary file-sharing tool, it is effective for quick and transparent sharing. Overall, users think Microsoft Teams excels in collaborative file sharing, while they appreciate Microsoft Viva Engage for its simplicity and ease of sharing within the community. ## Pricing comparison ### Starting prices Microsoft Teams $4.00 Per User (Per Month) Free Trial Free Version [View pricing plans](https://www.capterra.com/p/168668/Microsoft-Teams/pricing/) Microsoft Viva Engage $8.00 Per User (Per Month) Free Trial Free Version ### Value-for-money analysis 4.4 (11019) 4.2 (819) Comparing reviews of both Microsoft Teams and Microsoft Viva Engage reveals how users perceive both products' value for money: Microsoft Teams reviewers say it offers comprehensive features and integration with other Microsoft tools at a reasonable cost, and Microsoft Viva Engage reviewers highlight its inclusion in Office 365 subscriptions and affordability. Reviewers find Microsoft Teams to be a cost-effective solution, especially when included in the Office 365 subscription. They appreciate its extensive features, such as video calls, messaging, and third-party app integration, which they say provide good value for money. However, some users mention that the pricing can be high for small businesses, and additional costs for premium features can be a drawback. When it comes to Microsoft Viva Engage, reviewers appreciate its inclusion in Office 365 subscriptions, noting that it incurs no additional costs for existing users. They also value its affordability and free basic plan. However, some users feel that the pricing can be high for small businesses, and the free version's limitations may necessitate an upgrade to a paid plan. ## Integrations Popular Integrations Compare available integrations between Microsoft Teams and Microsoft Viva Engage. ### Microsoft SharePoint Microsoft Teams Microsoft Viva Engage ### GitHub Microsoft Teams Microsoft Viva Engage ### Microsoft 365 Microsoft Teams Microsoft Viva Engage ### OneDrive Microsoft Teams Microsoft Viva Engage ### Smartsheet Microsoft Teams Microsoft Viva Engage ### Microsoft Teams Microsoft Teams Microsoft Viva Engage ### Trello Microsoft Teams Microsoft Viva Engage ### Salesforce Sales Cloud Microsoft Teams Microsoft Viva Engage Total Integrations 59 Microsoft SharePoint Users report that they integrate SharePoint with Teams for file sharing, document collaboration, organizing project-specific pages, and accessing a centralized document repository. Microsoft Excel Reviewers state that they use Excel with Teams for sharing, editing, and collaborating on spreadsheets, which they say enhances data management and real-time collaboration. Microsoft Word Users mention that they integrate Word with Teams for sharing, editing, and collaborating on documents, noting that it facilitates real-time updates and efficient teamwork. Microsoft PowerPoint Reviewers report that they use PowerPoint with Teams for creating, sharing, and presenting slides during meetings, which they indicate enhances remote collaboration and training sessions. Microsoft OneNote Users say that they use OneNote with Teams for taking and sharing meeting notes, citing that it helps in organizing information and maintaining documentation within team channels. Microsoft Teams Integrations (59) - [Adobe Acrobat](https://www.capterra.com/p/251329/Adobe-Acrobat-DC/) - [Asana](https://www.capterra.com/p/184581/Asana-PM/) - [Assembly](https://www.capterra.com/p/214210/Assembly/) - [Axonify](https://www.capterra.com/p/130669/Axonify/) - [Booking](https://www.capterra.com/p/106408/Booking/) - [Calendar Pro](https://www.capterra.com/p/183497/The-Calendar-Pro/) - [Calendly](https://www.capterra.com/p/148036/Calendly/) - [Canva](https://www.capterra.com/p/168956/Canva/) - [Claude](https://www.capterra.com/p/10011218/Claude/) - [Copilot](https://www.capterra.com/p/190435/CoPilot/) - [Copilot](https://www.capterra.com/p/255199/Copilot/) - [Desk](https://www.capterra.com/p/10021130/Desk/) - [Drop](https://www.capterra.com/p/211662/Ringless-Voicemail-Drops/) - [Dynamics 365](https://www.capterra.com/p/157279/Dynamics-365/) - [Figma](https://www.capterra.com/p/175027/Figma/) - [Fireflies](https://www.capterra.com/p/197037/Fireflies/) - [Foxit PDF Editor](https://www.capterra.com/p/249044/Foxit-PDF-Editor/) - [GitHub](https://www.capterra.com/p/129067/GitHub/) - [Google Calendar](https://www.capterra.com/p/213340/Google-Calendar/) - [Hootsuite](https://www.capterra.com/p/121701/HootSuite/) - [Hub](https://www.capterra.com/p/167289/Hub/) - [Intercom](https://www.capterra.com/p/134347/Intercom/) - [Jira](https://www.capterra.com/p/19319/JIRA/) - [Kahoot!](https://www.capterra.com/p/156399/Kahoot/) - [Lucidchart](https://www.capterra.com/p/146136/Lucidchart/) - [Maestro](https://www.capterra.com/p/173124/Maestro/) - [Maestro](https://www.capterra.com/p/36429/RapidResponse/) - [Maestro](https://www.capterra.com/p/119493/Maestro/) - [Maestro](https://www.capterra.com/p/218473/Maestro/) - [Maestro](https://www.capterra.com/p/232824/Maestro/) - [Maestro\*ERP](https://www.capterra.com/p/83238/Maestro-Solutions/) - [Microsoft 365](https://www.capterra.com/p/227157/Microsoft-365/) - [Microsoft Excel](https://www.capterra.com/p/176574/Excel/) - [Microsoft OneNote](https://www.capterra.com/p/227211/Microsoft-OneNote/) - [Microsoft Outlook](https://www.capterra.com/p/227138/Microsoft-Outlook/) - [Microsoft Planner](https://www.capterra.com/p/227201/Microsoft-Planner/) - [Microsoft Power BI](https://www.capterra.com/p/176586/Power-BI/) - [Microsoft PowerPoint](https://www.capterra.com/p/141633/PowerPoint/) - [Microsoft SharePoint](https://www.capterra.com/p/1167/SharePoint/) - [Microsoft To Do](https://www.capterra.com/p/227173/Wunderlist/) - [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.com/p/80230/microsoft-visual-studio/) - [Microsoft Word](https://www.capterra.com/p/227146/Microsoft-Word/) - [MindManager](https://www.capterra.com/p/31776/MindManager/) - [Miro](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/) - [monday.com](https://www.capterra.com/p/147657/monday-com/) - [Office](https://www.capterra.com/p/248807/Office/) - [OneDrive](https://www.capterra.com/p/161304/OneDrive/) - [Rea](https://www.capterra.com/p/205385/Rea/) - [Slido](https://www.capterra.com/p/154051/Slido/) - [Smartsheet](https://www.capterra.com/p/79104/Smartsheet/) - [Spot](https://www.capterra.com/p/194681/Spot/) - [Templafy](https://www.capterra.com/p/154533/Templafy/) - [Trello](https://www.capterra.com/p/211559/Trello/) - [Turn](https://www.capterra.com/p/248205/Turn/) - [Wrike](https://www.capterra.com/p/76113/Wrike/) - [YouTube](https://www.capterra.com/p/237905/YouTube/) - [Zendesk Suite](https://www.capterra.com/p/164283/Zendesk/) - [Zoho Desk](https://www.capterra.com/p/169505/Zoho-Desk/) - [Zoom Workplace](https://www.capterra.com/p/144037/Zoom-Video-Conferencing/) Total Integrations 7 Microsoft Teams Reviewers mention that Microsoft Viva Engage integrates with Teams, which they say allows easy access to Yammer, autopost notifications, and seamless communication across the organization. Microsoft SharePoint Users report that Viva Engage integrates with SharePoint, which they note facilitates content sharing, document management, and enhances collaborative tools for team communication. Microsoft 365 Reviewers state that Viva Engage integrates with Microsoft 365, citing that it supports knowledge sharing, social networking, and seamless interaction with other Office applications. Microsoft Viva Engage Integrations (7) - [GitHub](https://www.capterra.com/p/129067/GitHub/) - [Microsoft 365](https://www.capterra.com/p/227157/Microsoft-365/) - [Microsoft SharePoint](https://www.capterra.com/p/1167/SharePoint/) - [Microsoft Teams](https://www.capterra.com/p/168668/Microsoft-Teams/) - [OneDrive](https://www.capterra.com/p/161304/OneDrive/) - [Salesforce Sales Cloud](https://www.capterra.com/p/61368/Salesforce/) - [Sideways 6](https://www.capterra.com/p/154307/Sideways-6/) For each product, we show you the most common integrations according to our user reviews and analyze themes in what reviewers say to highlight what you need to know. ## How does the user experience compare on Microsoft Teams vs Microsoft Viva Engage? ### Overall rating 4.5 (11019) 4.2 (819) ### User interface Microsoft Teams Microsoft Viva Engage ### Customer service and support Microsoft Teams Email/Help Desk FAQs/Forum Knowledge Base Phone Support 24/7 (Live rep) Chat Microsoft Viva Engage Email/Help Desk FAQs/Forum Knowledge Base Phone Support 24/7 (Live rep) Chat ## What users say about the pros and cons of Microsoft Teams vs Microsoft Viva Engage Both Microsoft Teams and Microsoft Viva Engage have been reviewed by verified reviewers on Capterra. See what real users say about their experiences with Microsoft Teams and Microsoft Viva Engage to help you pick the tool that best fits your needs. Users appreciate Microsoft Teams for its robust team collaboration features, including real-time document editing and integration with other Microsoft products. They also value its online meeting capabilities, noting the ease of scheduling and recording meetings. Additionally, reviewers find the video conferencing features reliable and efficient, highlighting the ability to share screens and record sessions. When it comes to Microsoft Viva Engage, users commend its Yammer communication tool for enhancing organizational connectivity and real-time collaboration. They also appreciate its effectiveness in internal communication and team collaboration, citing its integration with Office 365 and mobile accessibility. As for the cons, Microsoft Teams users mention issues with chat functionality, screen sharing, and occasional video call disruptions. Meanwhile, Microsoft Viva Engage users find the user interface cluttered and outdated, experience notification overload, and encounter problems with post organization. \[[2](#source-item-2)\] Pros Microsoft Teams Yugma S Assay development and integration technicianBiotechnology, 201 - 500 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “It has helped me in centralizing chat, call, meeting notes, screen share with cross functional teams mainly clients and distant team members.“ May 4, 2026 SA Samer A AI ResearcherComputer Software, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “It is a bit complex to customise and record the meetings and videos, while it is so helpful to cover all forms of communication, I look forward to connect tit to virtual reality meetings and adding support to that meeting format.“ March 10, 2026 Microsoft Viva Engage PS Parvez S COOInformation Technology and Services, 201 - 500 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “With Viva Engage, I am able to connect to my colleagues across several countries, have discussions with them, make announcements, make polls and praise colleagues who do great things.“ October 8, 2024 EB Erinn B Client Service Specialist IIAccounting, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: 6-12 months. “What I like most about Viva Engage is that it is a space where you and your co workers are able to engage in anything you want to create.“ September 17, 2024 Cons Microsoft Teams CP CANDICE P Account's officerTransportation/Trucking/Railroad, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “Notifications could also get a bit chaotic messages popping up in different places, or alerts not syncing the way you expected. And even though Teams is meant to simplify communication, some features felt buried or overly complicated, especially when you just wanted a straightforward way to find a file or revisit a conversation.“ January 4, 2026 Denis M RecruiterFinancial Services, 201 - 500 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “It gets the job done for basic corporate communication, but the constant lag and heavy RAM usage get annoying fast. If I just need to jump on a quick, stable video call with a client, I will almost always choose Google Meet over this.“ April 28, 2026 Microsoft Viva Engage TV Tatiana V Associate DirectorHealth, Wellness and Fitness, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “The only minor feedback I have is the post sorting sometimes, it’ll default to new posts and when I switch the filter to all the posts will sometimes be out of order.“ November 17, 2024 JS Jocelyn S Veterinary Nurse and Client Care RepresentativeVeterinary, 201 - 500 employeesUsed the software for: 6-12 months. “I also don't like that there is an ability to alert the entire team with your posts- it gets over utilised and clogs up your msg box.“ August 22, 2024 * * * Sources 1. Our research team identified features from vendor websites based on their analysis of what users find valuable or expect from team communication software. This list is not exhaustive. For additional features, refer to the vendor’s website. 2. Review excerpts are passages extracted from longer reviews written by verified reviewers. We obtain these excerpts by applying an algorithm that considers factors including, but not limited to, length, topic coverage, and thematic relevance. Excerpts are evaluated for positive or negative sentiment and receive a sentiment score. They represent user opinion and do not represent the views of, nor constitute, an endorsement by Capterra or its affiliates. Excerpts are not edited for clarity or grammar. * * * Popular comparisons - [Microsoft Teams vs Zoom Workplace](https://www.capterra.com/compare/144037-168668/Zoom-Video-Conferencing-vs-Microsoft-Teams) - [Microsoft Teams vs Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.com/compare/168668-247901/Microsoft-Teams-vs-Google-Workspace) - [Microsoft Teams vs Google Meet](https://www.capterra.com/compare/168668-176572/Microsoft-Teams-vs-Google-Hangouts) - [Microsoft Teams vs Slack](https://www.capterra.com/compare/135003-168668/Slack-vs-Microsoft-Teams) - [Microsoft Teams vs GoTo Meeting](https://www.capterra.com/compare/163332-168668/GoToMeeting-vs-Microsoft-Teams) - [Microsoft Viva Engage vs Slack](https://www.capterra.com/compare/135003-227175/Slack-vs-Yammer) - [Microsoft Viva Engage vs Connecteam](https://www.capterra.com/compare/153140-227175/Connecteam-vs-Yammer) - [Microsoft Viva Engage vs Telegram](https://www.capterra.com/compare/180347-227175/Telegram-vs-Yammer) - [Microsoft Viva Engage vs Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.com/compare/227175-247901/Yammer-vs-Google-Workspace) - [Microsoft Viva Engage vs Asana](https://www.capterra.com/compare/184581-227175/Asana-PM-vs-Yammer)