Race Entry vs On the Stage: Which is a better fit?

Jake: I'm Jake, Director of Products. I give Race Entry four out of five stars. For more reviews like this, click below. So when we looked for different registration platforms for events, we looked at everything from Ultra Signup to ACTIVE, to CrowdTorch or Kimbia, a bunch of other different options. And we ended up with Race Entry for some of our international events. There were a few different reasons that we ended up choosing Race Entry. One of which was the support team was super responsive. They were quick with emails and phone calls, and when we needed some minor development work done, they were really quick to get it done. And the product worked. It didn't require a lot of additional effort to get things implemented and get us up and running. And so, between the really responsive support team and the pretty quality out-of-the-box product, we were quite happy with it. Onboarding and integration of Race Entry was pretty straightforward. We just needed to get the various URLs on to our website and make sure that all of the data for the events was able to be pulled in by Race Entry. And other than that, it was pretty seamless in terms of integration and getting things up and running. It was within a few days that we were able to go from making the decision to being live. If you have a smaller operation, more of a couple of folks in your event, running your event, and you don't need a lot of custom formats or additional scripting or really crazy data, Race Entry is a really good solution for the majority of a 5K, 10K, half marathon, marathon type event. Once you start getting into weird format types and a bunch of crazy data, Race Entry definitely does have its limitations. And so, you might need to seek other more complex and less off-the-shelf solutions. But if you fall within the majority of the type of events that are pretty straightforward, I think Race Entry is a pretty great choice.