Layer2 Cloud Connector vs Appmixer: Which is a better fit?

Have had no reason to engage with the support team until the upgrade, and the support has been same day and great, much appreciated.

For this purpose no specific functionality missing.

Great product to work with: fast, reliable and great support.

Enterprise version is very expensive in comparison with annual fee, and without that FTP is limited to 25 transfers per sessions.

I like how you can easily sync data from a SharePoint list or document library to a SQL database. It’s also great how it splits out lookup columns into their ids and values.

Jörn J

Senior SharePoint Developer

No the Connector runs every 2 hours. I have set up bi-directional syncs also as simple one-side-to-another.

The ability to schedule syncs, to have multiple syncs. We use it to bring SQL data into SharePoint online which we loved as there was no other way to achieve what we needed.

These lists needed to be manually maintained by the process owners since we had no way to sync the data from our business systems.

Oytun O

CTO

Appmixer platform is very flexible and comes with a good set of components. You can access and modify these components' source code, which is a great help.

Edmund E

Senior Product Manager

Documentation can be missing in some places, and there have been a few quirks leftover from earlier iterations of the product.

Edmund E

Senior Product Manager

The ability to host the solution ourselves and extend it with our own code. This made processes around security and privacy significantly simpler as it is running on our own infrastructure.

UI/UX could be simpler/easier. Sometimes it crashes with poor UO feedback.

I like the ease of embedding it into our own app. It fits in nicely, both from a design as well as from a technical pov.

As the product offers many tools, documentation can be missing in some places.

I really like the breadth of integrations and the quality of support.