Helping businesses choose
better software since 1999
better software since 1999
Guides & Research
Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Computer software, E-learning, Internet, Publishing, Retail, Financial services, Information technology and services, Web design and development, SaaS, Digital Marketing, SIs, PaaS, Fintech, Healthtec
Developers, Quality Assurance, Software Testing, E2E Testing, No-Code Tools, Artificial Intelligence, Test Automation
The ability to spin up browser specific test environments was fantastic. The ease of integration with different language frameworks for writing and executing automated tests was pretty attractive too.
Our customers started reporting that our websites stuck in lower verisons of IE and Firefox. So we thought to get it tested and yes they stuck.
Their customer service is really fast and helpful. Best of all it was cheaper and it works better then the reset of competition.
On rare occasions LT could be a bit slow to load the test environments (~15 seconds), which could be a problem when hundreds of browser/device/OS combos need to be tested quickly.
Easy to use and extremely helpful with all test important testing and revalidation. Definitely like the smooth and easy process.
There is a bit of a lag when using this product which makes it a bit difficult when testing as to whether it is the page that I am testing is not as responsive or the lag from the virtual machine.
The most important feature I like about Lambdatest is that it is very user-friendly due to its good UI, plus it provides all the latest devices to use even updating its browser versions.
There is a bit of lag, but I understand I'm controlling another machine over the internet, but the lag isn't that much, I was still able to work and get the job done.
Overall, MagicPod is a fantastic test automation system, with an easy-to-use interface and a wealth of functionality for large-scale projects.
As I have noticed that there is no option available to maintain and keep track of the system activities, troubleshoot real-time problems, or retrieve important information when lost.
Good and friendly customer services. Also, it is very easy to use which makes it an overall good experience.
It can be difficult to keep track of system activities, discover and troubleshoot difficulties, or retrieve vital information if this feature is missing.
If you need to efficiently manage complex projects, MagicPod is an excellent software option. Its user friendly interface and robust capabilities make it a top choice.
One thing that, I missing from MagicPod is that it does not provide a built-in logging feature which makes tracking the system hard and also it is a little bit expensive also for small businesses.
Testing we applications using MagicPod is so amazing because it gives us accurate results. MagicPod has friendly features that I love using.
Its difficult to keep a track of system activities.
Speaker 1: I'm Karthik. I work as an engineering manager. My rating for LambdaTest is three stars out of five. For more reviews like this, please click the link below. BrowserStack was the other platform that we evaluated before we tested out LambdaTest. And in our experience we felt BrowserStack was a little bit more mature as compared to LambdaTest. [inaudible 00:00:34] a little bit more pricier, but we found BrowserStack to be a little bit more mature given that they were in the industry longer than LambdaTest. Our first choice was BrowserStack, but cost was definitely a barrier, which is why we decided to evaluate LambdaTest. I believe it was fairly easy to onboard this platform, but I think it can still get challenging depending on how bespoke your particular environment is. You may run into specific challenges integrating this tool into your platform depending on what sort of custom implementation you have on your end. So that's something to keep in mind. If it's a fairly vanilla implementation, shouldn't be too much of a problem. It should be quick and easy. But if you have like a custom implementation, then there could be challenges integrating this into your platform. You definitely have to take into consideration the environment that you have and if LambdaTest will work from the standpoint of being able to want support all of the browsers and the platforms that you're looking to run your tests on. The ease of writing and maintaining tests that comes with something like LambdaTest, the barrier to entry in terms of learning curve for your engineers with respect to picking this platform up and being able to run with it. And then last but not the least, cost is also a factor. So that's something to keep in mind as well when you evaluate a platform such as LambdaTest.
LambdaTest
MagicPod
LambdaTest
--
Products similar to those you're currently comparing:
