Helping businesses choose
better software since 1999
better software since 1999
Guides & Research
Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Computer software, E-learning, Internet, Publishing, Retail, Financial services, Information technology and services, Web design and development, SaaS, Digital Marketing, SIs, PaaS, Fintech, Healthtec
Technical teams to record demos and report bugs, Sales teams to send video pitches, Everyone else to replace meetings and create how-to videos
The ability to spin up browser specific test environments was fantastic. The ease of integration with different language frameworks for writing and executing automated tests was pretty attractive too.
Our customers started reporting that our websites stuck in lower verisons of IE and Firefox. So we thought to get it tested and yes they stuck.
Their customer service is really fast and helpful. Best of all it was cheaper and it works better then the reset of competition.
On rare occasions LT could be a bit slow to load the test environments (~15 seconds), which could be a problem when hundreds of browser/device/OS combos need to be tested quickly.
Easy to use and extremely helpful with all test important testing and revalidation. Definitely like the smooth and easy process.
There is a bit of a lag when using this product which makes it a bit difficult when testing as to whether it is the page that I am testing is not as responsive or the lag from the virtual machine.
The most important feature I like about Lambdatest is that it is very user-friendly due to its good UI, plus it provides all the latest devices to use even updating its browser versions.
There is a bit of lag, but I understand I'm controlling another machine over the internet, but the lag isn't that much, I was still able to work and get the job done.
I especially like that ANYONE can use it - pretty much everyone uses Chrome (or a Chromium-based browser, like Edge, Brave etc.) and it's super easy to use.
I cannot delete the workspace I created. And sometimes it can miss errors while catching errors.
Overall, it's been super useful and has saved me a lot of time. I have recommended it to a couple of friends and reported bugs to their projects.
Missing features, but that's being worked on from what I understood, so waiting for that. Our engineers were missing the network log, as well as mouse and keyboard inputs.
I like that it's overall usage just involves 3 steps maximum - record -> upload -> share. Having minimal overhead is fantastic for users.
Data ways always missing, was incomplete and so there was a lot of back and forth involved until we were able to pinpoint the bug.
The recordings are useful and clear. The concept of the tool is solid.
It will crash if a page sends out a lot of errors.
Speaker 1: I'm Karthik. I work as an engineering manager. My rating for LambdaTest is three stars out of five. For more reviews like this, please click the link below. BrowserStack was the other platform that we evaluated before we tested out LambdaTest. And in our experience we felt BrowserStack was a little bit more mature as compared to LambdaTest. [inaudible 00:00:34] a little bit more pricier, but we found BrowserStack to be a little bit more mature given that they were in the industry longer than LambdaTest. Our first choice was BrowserStack, but cost was definitely a barrier, which is why we decided to evaluate LambdaTest. I believe it was fairly easy to onboard this platform, but I think it can still get challenging depending on how bespoke your particular environment is. You may run into specific challenges integrating this tool into your platform depending on what sort of custom implementation you have on your end. So that's something to keep in mind. If it's a fairly vanilla implementation, shouldn't be too much of a problem. It should be quick and easy. But if you have like a custom implementation, then there could be challenges integrating this into your platform. You definitely have to take into consideration the environment that you have and if LambdaTest will work from the standpoint of being able to want support all of the browsers and the platforms that you're looking to run your tests on. The ease of writing and maintaining tests that comes with something like LambdaTest, the barrier to entry in terms of learning curve for your engineers with respect to picking this platform up and being able to run with it. And then last but not the least, cost is also a factor. So that's something to keep in mind as well when you evaluate a platform such as LambdaTest.
LambdaTest
Bird Eats Bug
Top FeaturesLambdaTest
--
Products similar to those you're currently comparing:
