Helping businesses choose
better software since 1999
better software since 1999
Guides & Research
Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Devs, QAs, SMEs and PMs in cross-functional development teams, who want to implement and scale test automation without multiple tools and maintenance costs.
Not provided by vendor
Good for automating repetitive tests (smoke&sanity tests). Good for automating processes that does not require too much configuration or dynamism.
Inability to link test suites so that when one ends, the next is kicked off. There is a workaround for this, but it requires multiple parallel user accounts.
We are happy with their quality of services and will definitely continue to use your tool.
Sometimes it was hard to get consistency in our Test Cases, some due to the product not being able to accurately identify an element and some due to our own complex DOM.
Support team are outstanding. We even got interviewed to give feedback on Pro's and Con's and felt we had influence over the Roadmap so as to get our needs met.
Reports could be clearer. Lack of full-page screenshot in some browsers but possible with custom function.
Good project management. Responsive customer suport.
I made tests after I watched a 5minute guide video with no experience in testing what so ever and it took about 45minutes to make six tests cases for out dev ops pipeline.
We are extremely happy with our overall experience using Testomat. It has significantly improved our testing processes, making them more efficient and effective.
Transforming manual tests in automated tests are now automated fully. No manual job should be done there.
Now we have superb testing process that is clear and transparent for everyone in a team.
Our test report requirements is to have screenshots and video-recording for each failures. There were some issues with S3 configuration to make it available on testomat side.
I also liked the ease of use, the ease of creating bug reports and attaching them to tests (both automated and manual), the ability to connect CI, Jira.
However, I haven't used it yet on a commercial test project. It was postponed to the future by me.
Good system for automated tests with nice analytics in place.
If you do not carefully read the documentation, then there may be problems with understanding the basic settings.
Testsigma
testomat.io
Top FeaturesTestsigma
--
testomat.io
--
Products similar to those you're currently comparing:
