Laser Audit Reporting System - LARS vs GRC Toolbox: Which is a better fit?

Auto follow-up of implementation of audit observations feature of LARS is very good. Excellent support from LARS team.

There are no as such cons about this product as whatever customization required is achieved.

Their proactive approach to hunt for improvements in the existing modules for new upgrades in the existing software is a great value add.

Old UI/UX and Less no of data points to capture granular details.

I like the following benefits the most. Saving in time and effort: Earlier we were spending lot of time in compiling observations in Excel for following-up implementation.

Its being used by auditee, auditors and management with no difficulty.

First of all customer support was excellent during implementation and even currently.

Future we have to explore the possibility of offline mobile applications and GPS tracker and use of AI.

I find it successful that its price is affordable, that its functions are successful, that it is serene and practical.

Unfortunately, I couldn't see anything missing, although everything is more than enough.

My experience with GRC Toolbox has been breathtaking. It offers quality functionalities and comes with an intuitive and more user-friendly user interface that makes it easy to use.

GRC Toolbox lack on-premise mobile application for iOS.

It has impressive VDO thus help me the flexibility to explore and experiment with various styles and aesthetics. Seamless experience in creating unique and captivating designs for different projects.

I had a hard time deciphering some of the tools in it.

It is very advantageous for us that it has a great interface and user-friendliness.

Salim S

Non Executive Director

A mastermind product in governance, risk and compliance.