Helping businesses choose
better software since 1999
better software since 1999
Guides & Research
Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Engineering and construction firms, project managers, document controllers
Companies based in Colombia, Mexico, Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Panama, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Cuba, el Salvador, Bolivia, Brasil, Argentina and Paraguay.
Transmittal module, very configurable, with good tracking of pending replies. Possibility to manage full project portfolio once the system is implemented, without going back to the vendor.
No "U-Turn" to Review stage once workflow stage moved to Comment Compilation, compiler need to offline circulate the documents to additional reviewers if required.
It is SharePoint based, hence the GUIs are extremely familiar with relation to other Microsoft Products which keeps the standard features extremely user friendly.
System is customized to what end user needs, and they have no chance to say 'No', 'Didn't receive' etc.
A very versatile, robust and configurable document control system.
Suggest to have UI analyst at design and build phase. System implementation will not be effective with lack of change management.
Since I haven't been able to use all options in the system yet, I cannot give feedback about that. But with excelent help of the Pulz Support team, we were able to get the documents into Pulz quickly.
The implementation strategy created confusion to the users as the system being branded with different name - BMS DC vs EDCS.
Prioritize real-user-identified key features according to your needs to find your best fit.
PULZ Document Control System
KAWAK
PULZ Document Control System
--
Talk with a software expert for free. Get a list of software that’s great for you in less than 15 minutes.
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: