Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Suitable for biotech, industry, academic, and start-up life science labs that value flexibility in the setup of their workflows and lab digitization efforts.
Scientists, research directors, IT managers and executives at biotech companies. Areas covered include antibodies, cell/gene therapies, proteins/peptides, vaccines, synthetic biology, and agritech.
Our end-users are very happy with the solution and we are receiving positive feedback. The team around Zareh is very knowledgeable about their product but also about the current market and trends.
Since we bought into it, the Journal is stuck in development or asks for additional money for features that should be integrated for molecular biology purposes.
Great customer support and service, this offers an appreciable and competitive value. This software is very good and taking in data, especially as a PDFs.
Frequent users will start to see issues with flexibility in correcting erroneous details of entries (not yet finalized), or setting up high-functioning templates for repeated experiments.
The collaboration is outstanding as any interaction is honest, transparent and direct. I would highly recommend to work with Zareh and his team.
Still no possibility to use a stylus to annotate gel pictures or write entries.
Likewise, the pricing was very competitive and the team at eLab has been very responsive and pleasant to work with.
When being used to paper-based experiments, the investment of time you need to digitalize your experiments in eLabJournal is really high. We miss some Project/Study/Experiment filtering tools.
I have been using Benchling for a few years and I am always happy with it. It has been continuously improving and they really care about the needs of their users.
Constantly copying and pasting plasmids from one location to another gets annoying after the 30th plasmid.
Over all, I honestly love benchling. Its so useful when it comes to cloning and helps visualize the plasmids so easily for me, and students that I teach.
Sometimes, copying data or exporting data from benchhling to external folders are difficult.
It is great to use, super easy to go from DNA to protein. Easy to visualize everything and to align sequences.
Sometimes hard to manipulate trash/archived files.
I love how I can edit and work on my projects easily, and there is so much easy ways to edits and write notes for reference. I will continue to use benchling in the future b/c i love it so much.
One of the challenges we have found as we've begun to use Benchling more is that there are some features we've gotten used to using and rely on, but then they will disappear.
eLabNext
Top FeaturesBenchling
eLabNext
Benchling
--
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: