Office Tracker vs Nibol: Which is a better fit?

We have enjoyed the ease of access in scheduling the meetings we need to and keep track of them. It's accessible and able to recall past information easily which is very important to us.

But when our third user turns on Office Tracker the program fails. And if I call to ask ONE question, I have to pay over $100.00 to get it answered.

The ease in the ability to book and view room usage. With 7 departments using rooms and areas in the facility, we are able to successfully coordinate with others to eliminate double bookings.

The program is very delicate. If instructions are not followed correctly there will always be lingering problems.

The software is fairly easy to use. We appreciate the ability to color-code information.

When trying to contact someone by email a reply time seems delayed. And have a difficult time changing our color coding in drop down box.

So impressed by Office Tracker which is why I have been using this for over 10 years.

This is time consuming and creates the potential for errors.

Easy setup process and superb UX/UI. The setup was a breeze – intuitive steps guides the admin user through the configuration: the system was up and running in no time.

Missing 3D plant view and interface for touchscreens at the entrance of our office.

The UI, the responsiveness and the ease of use are the things I liked most about Nibol.

The limitations on check-in imposed by my organization.

It makes it simple, almost fun, to find a place every day. If I don't want to deal with it, I can also book for an entire month in advance.

Filtering of booking or no booking status for all users.

The user-friendliness is a huge advantage, saving precious time from back-office perspective and ensuring quick onboarding time to end users.

I don't like the check-in feature if i reserve a place.