Granite Risk Management vs GOAT Risk: Which is a better fit?

The team was amazing and they had great marketing during the procurement phase. Very customer oriented and very effective project management team.

There is no manual for administrators. It is difficult to remember how to work with some problems, as the tasks are not frequent and one cannot have automatic routine.

Altogether our experience has been really positive, good value for money and being a company from Finland is a big benefit also.

In a globally operating organisation developing without right tools is usually inefficient and frustrating.

It’s quick and easy to make little adjustments to the services so they fit perfectly to our processes and help us to take them even further.

The risk items could not be linked to the compliance requirements.

The best feature of Granite is its user-friendliness which was also the top priority when selecting the system.

Granite puts risks into the right perspective.

The customer support function and abilities are superb. Calls are answered within hours.

It does not include a archive function for closed risks. It is important to also have a overview of risks that is sorted/mitigated during and not at least in the end of a year.

The overall experience with GOAT is one which is positive. It is a system that will help drive a stronger more embedded risk culture and help people manage their risks effectively.

Not being able to add our our titles to custom reports was disappointing, however I can completely understand the limitations following a chat with [SENSITIVE CONTENT.

Fantastic customer service, very responsive and even a personal call from the CEO.

Still in the making, a few missing features and limitations.

The setup was painless and the ease of use in general is very good.

Dashboards have fairly limited customisation in comparison to every other feature in the tool.