Helix ALM vs ReQtest: Which is a better fit?

I like that it ties everything together and if you have things set up correctly, you get great trace-ability. It is VERY powerful, and flexible.

Lack of HTML support in emails sent by Helix ALM. It still doesn't support inline images.

Easy to fit the processes to our needs. It is realy a good thing, that this software is so easy to fit also to smal process and deep, and complex processes.

In issue window it's hard to see some details as they are hidden in various tabs.

The most important thing is Filters and our company using it as much as possible. Also, we are very happy about Requirements section.

I use this for test case development and defect tracking.

Shelving files is a great feature for users because they are saved onto the server and if the developers system crashes or the developer left the company, other users can retrieve them.

The text editor is still functional, but it's fallen below the minimum expectations for a text editor in this day and age.

Sakunder S

SAP Programme Manager

The User Interface was very fresh and it had a great look and feel. The ability to customise the product to fit in with your project needs.

There is some issues when running Requetest in Internet explorer and because that is our corporate browser that can be a problem sometimes for us.

It follows industry wide standards for quality testing and it is reasonably priced. Best of all the audit trail is fantastic.

Under test runs, it’s difficult to move/organizing the test cases.

Further benefits are the documentation and the reports that I easily get out. As a Project Manager, I constantly need to keep track of progress and quality.

Can be a little difficult to master and control.

Sakunder S

SAP Programme Manager

Requirements traceability and Test Reporting were made very easy when operating in a Global Business. Test Case Management the Easy Test Tool made it a great experience for our UAT testers.