Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
All teams
Used by more than a million problem solvers from small businesses to 50,000+ of the world’s greatest companies in all types of industries. Anyone can make a custom app unique to their business.
This software is great - it provides great reports, you can customize the dashboards, it has a great way to keep track of your work, and it's really helpful for managing development.
I dislike both how it's hard for me to use and how it's hard for others to use - I run into instances of people misunderstanding the software all the time, which creates mistakes and wasted time.
I am using this tool since several months and I found this software amazing as it is very easy to handle and tracking the created Bugs, Task or Improvement tickets in excellent way.
It slows down productivity. This could be a company specific flaw but I hated always having to ask product managers for permission to access documents that I needed.
The ease of use is such a timesaver. Also the many integrations with other attlassian products is great, it really saves a lot of time and it's a great as documentation.
It can be costly and there are nasty sides on the licensing. For example, you can't use plugins for a limited number of users, and only pay for that the number of users.
I like the functionality the ability to run real time reports and issue tracking with ease. I love the collaboration amongst peers and so every stakeholder is informed.
Unable to clone the tasks when it is Done. Sometimes, my members having mistakes in cloning because sometimes the tasks that already set to Done status is unable to see the cloned one if you clone it.
Flexibility and speed to produce a desired change are the main benefits of FileMaker. It's easy to accomplish what you need, with simple scripting guidelines.
What it worse we found the cloud software laggy, and underperforming, slowing what was the usual workstation workflow.
File Maker is super easy to set up and super easy to become proficient in. It's super reliable to use a tool that's 30 years old, and still getting powerful additions regularly.
Over the years, the licensing of FMP has progressively gotten worse. If I could find another solution, I would.
It can integrate with nearly any web service that has a Rest API. FileMaker has a fantastic community of developers that are willing to share and help each other.
It wouldn't be so bad if I could upgrade but no apparently I can't upgrade from my version to Filemaker Pro 19.
Medium easy to use, but with great results, the data base behind it its amazing to access to create your own Exccell customized date based.
The company was not accepting our form of payment, and we kept receiving automated mails threatening to curtail the service.
Jake D.: My name is Jake, my company is Uni. We are one to 10 people, and my score for Jira was a four. Before we were using Trello and we didn't like it as much as Jira, because it really only was good for task management, but the tickets and organizing complex projects weren't as strong on it. We also really liked the documentation and the ability to do other things in Jira that Trello didn't offer. So in general just as we grew and had more engineers to manage and more complex software projects to manage, Jira became a better fit for our company. I chose Jira first and foremost, because the devs at my company really liked it and had experience working on it. It also allowed us to manage a front-end and backend team more easily and collaborate with ease compared to the other products we were looking at. It was affordable for startups and also supported us scaling all the way up if we were to grow our org to be much larger. As I had used it in previous companies that were bigger enterprises and saw it used for everything from documentation to ticket management to product management and development, so it just made the most sense for our org as we grew and was very affordable. Getting started with Jira was pretty easy, it took us about a week. We had a designated project manager who went about kind of setting up every user and getting the board set up the way we needed. We had engineering leads trained in how to do ticketing and how to move tickets from beginning to end pretty quickly. I think a lot of people use Jira and have experience with it coming out of school or bootcamp, so it was a pretty easy switch for us. Coming over from Trello, we found it was pretty fast to recreate the tickets and our processes from that. I think my biggest recommendation is just making sure that the engineers really want it. I think that project managers, it really caters to and has a great amount of tools for documenting, doing product recs, doing task management, QA, all of that. But I think if the devs aren't comfortable using it for pointing, using it for work management, it kind of gets out of line or doesn't get set up in a proper way. So, asking your developers to make sure that that's the tool they want and making sure it's set up in a way that's optimal for them I think makes it a much smoother transition, and easier for the business leads and product leads to engage with as well.
Mark: My name is Mark. I'm the president. I give Claris FileMaker Pro a four. For more reviews, click below. I use Claris FileMaker Pro for our databases for media. That includes radio, that includes other types of media, such as newspapers, magazines. I also use it to keep our customers together. What I like most about Claris FileMaker is the ability to keep making databases based on the previous database. So, for example, save your file as, so if you're using it to do another task, you could still keep those names and it works really smooth that way. Well, Claris FileMaker Pro is a complicated and powerful database, so you're going to need some training or someone who has experience in database work to set it up so it doesn't set up so easily.
Prioritize real-user-identified key features according to your needs to find your best fit.
Jira
Top FeaturesClaris FileMaker
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: