CodeScene vs CodeScan: Which is a better fit?

This not only improved quality but helped make sure we were focused on the most refactoring value.

If you have not commented your pull requests or check-ins correctly, to be able to trace e.g. defects in certain areas, then it will of course be difficult to make any conclusions.

Opening the tool for the first time was a truly exciting experience, and the more I learned, the more excited and empowered I got.

The highest risks in the code base lead directly to quality problems in production.

CodeScene has helped us find ways to improve the productivity of our development teams and measure our success. Ultimately improving how quickly we can deliver value to the business.

Shougehossen S

Freelencer

In one case it assisted us with anticipating what part of our venture planned to defer the item discharge.

Johan J

Developer coach

My peers were thrilled at the level of understanding they could acquire in such a short timespan.

In one case it helped us predict which component of our project was going to delay the product release.

M very impressed and excited with the features of CodeScan so far. I think it will be extremely beneficial for our developers.

Ignoring these is simple, but then the email that it's been ignored is shot off and then the questions start rolling in.

Excellent documentation and a fair pricing model. Integrates with our DevSecOps CI/CD tool (Copado) seamlessly.

Sometime gives irrelevant errors, actually there is no error.

Ease of using, works nice with Jenkins pipeline. Good interactive dashboard.

There is probably a way to avoid the email getting sent out but I haven't looked into it yet.

Overall, fantastic tool that helps ensure code quality and best practices.

It doesn't report on individual scans. The report is tailored to the entire project and all the vulnerabilities that exist in your project.