ThreatLocker vs TypingDNA ActiveLock: Which is a better fit?

Speaker 1: Hi, I'm Daniel, CEO of Unique IT Pro. We're about 12 deep and my rating for ThreatLocker is a five. So before ThreatLocker, we used to just rely on basically taking away the local admin permission, not allowing users to have local admin. But we had a lot of challenges with people wanting that permission because they couldn't do things like install printers at home. So it was very challenging and it wasn't protecting. It was just a step in the right direction. But we're glad ThreatLocker came along. So when I basically was introduced to ThreatLocker, the application Whitelisting, the Elevation Control, those two made it a no-brainer for me to go with ThreatLocker. But then the additional stuff such as Ring Fencing, basically the ability to keep applications in their own lane and to use storage control. And when you look at ThreatLocker today and how they've evolved, I'm so happy that I selected ThreatLocker a few years ago. Going into any new solution, you always worry about not having the engineers and the time to take on such a solution, but ThreatLocker's onboarding where you spend some time with their engineer, it just made it so easy. We deployed. We met with him. Then we had a review 30 days later to secure the systems and he explained everything through the unified audit logs. And it just seemed like a blink of an eye, he was already using ThreatLocker internally and we were so ready to go to market. My advice to those considering ThreatLocker is it does so much. Don't feel overwhelmed. Don't feel like it's going to be too noisy. You got to go into it one component at a time. Do like we did. We did our test lab, then we did our internal systems before we got our feet wet with it, before we were ready to start taking on our clients. So I think you have to have that type of approach, phase into it, and don't try to just do the whole thing. Have your appetizer first before you get to your entree.