BuildPiper vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform: Which is a better fit?

Ease of configuration management across multiple environments. Added features are pretty useful like downtime scheduler, integrations & pipelines.

Costly, we make search some another competitor tools which is less costly.

Buildpiper is a good tool. We got a very good support for it whenever it is required.

Different colors could be added for warnings and errors.

Over experience is very good in terms of use, easy to manage Kubernetes environment as well as CICD.it supports ARM & AMD both.

Deployment Error Log Dashboard should be more descriptive.

Good and easy to use the product and features are also good.

No logs for who changed configurations of deployment of a service.

Flexibility Robust and more flexibility while coding. Best useful for developers , more advanced api better for connecting and works on a single one platform which advantages.

The error messages can be misleading. MUNIT gives a lot of problems when run with Maven.

Best performs and easy to use. Functionality is good forums and blogs helping in to the functionality is good developing Api's is easy.

Based of the Eclipse Platform it seems to have inherited the same basic problems. Memory leaks, weird port binding problems, and slow debugging performance.

A lot of great connectors an pallete activities, that will meet pretty much any requirement. Good Portal, There is still room for improvement on the Data Weave.

Enrico E

ANALISTA PROGRAMMATORE

The cloud version lack of third party monitoring tool. The version of the conector have some problem when you work in different environment.

Great team working together with great challenges. Really interesting and motivating to be part of a company that's growing so quickly and moving at such speed.

Its mocking service which always occurs a new error for me. it always generate more then one basic uri.