United Language Group Octave vs Comet: Which is a better fit?

I really like ULG and will be recommending them to other companies. I appreciate their attentiveness to my needs and their ability to provide translation in nearly any language.

As the only negative point, I must say that it is a complicated tool to learn to use, it requires time, information and it is a tedious process.

We appreciate United Language Group's consistent, quality and reliable translations produced through the Octave website.

The software can be expensive for small businesses or those with limited language needs.

My overall experience with ULG Octave has been a positive one. I really appreciate the good customer support when I have needed assistance.

The only downside I have experienced is that the translation quality can sometimes be a bit inconsistent, especially with more complex language and technical terminology.

I was particularly impressed by ULGO's user-friendly interface and effective capabilities, including real-time collaboration and process automation.

The ease of integration with existing pipelines and workflow is fantastic. I also love the new panels UI, it cuts down all configuration to a minimum.

The only thing which annoys me is the chaos in custom view settings.

This software is recommended by the class. The overall usage is pretty good, with easy setup and grading, and their intuitive interface.

Limited file size upload. It throws errors for bigger file size.

We have really enjoyed using comet. It's been really easy to setup and makes experiment tracking and gaining insight into the model's performance so much better.

Team size is limited on academic plan makes it hard to organize.

I needed a tool that would help me in keeping track of my experiments. I got a whole set of tools that is perfect for my ML research.

It is a bit hard to manage when there are too many experiment trails.