HrFlow.ai vs Constructor Proctor: Which is a better fit?

Their APIs fit what was desired from the parsing use cases we had and they have clear, proper documentation explaining how to utilize them.

AI in no code (or almost) at the service of recruitment.

API is very well designed and documented- Synchronous API calls are fast- Parsing quality is very good.

Signing up is a bit confusing. But once I watched all the videos, it made sense.

Till now everything is going smoothly and fun.

Isaac I

Talent Acquisition Specialist

It is very fast, very accurate, orientation-proof and easy to integrate with local job boards and ATSs. With the right system, it can save you a lot of time and man-hours of going through CVs.

Comprehensive dashboard providing clear insights into proctoring results. Advanced features like face recognition, speech detection, and identity verification.

There are still some issues when the AI misunderstands the user's interactions and gives more cheating points as it should be. So the human interaction is still needed.

On the positive side, the platform provides a clear and secure environment for taking exams, ensuring academic integrity. The interface is generally user-friendly, and instructions are easy to follow.

However, there are some drawbacks. I encounter a few technical glitches, such as minor lagging, which adds unnecessary stress during the exam.

By using Constructor Proctor you get the benefits of ensuring a fair and secure testing environment make it a valuable tool for upholding academic standards.

Michael M

CEO

Part of their programming made it so that if I wasn't 100% clear with my instructions, or people made mistakes, the default screens made it a bit confusing.

AI Proctoring with Outstanding Support and Comprehensive Features.

Two products that I used werepretty simple in use and met my expectations, not sure about cons, will continue to use and see if anything pops up.