Bitdefender GravityZone vs Cloudflare: Which is a better fit?

Walt R.: Hi, I'm Walt. I'm a System Admin. I give Bitdefender five out of five. Click below. We were using Sophos when we went to Bitdefender, and I really didn't consider any other products because I already done sufficient research to know that it was the product to go with. I ended up choosing Bitdefender because one, it was the highest rated product for years from Independent Labs, and I had extensive experience of using it as both, basically, the personal product and small business product, and it had been bulletproof. It was set and forget. It just works. Bitdefender was a breeze to deploy compared to other enterprise products I have had used in the past. I was able to do it all by myself without any input from support. The only thing that was a bit of a learning curve was just learning their particular user interface, which is not quite the same as you would get with most of the mainstream products. After using Bitdefender for, gosh, now seven years and having used other products, I can't recommend any other product for your basic anti-malware. They have increased the scope and the ability of the product without increasing the load on my computers. Nobody notices when we run full scans. It has the same features of standalone products like Carbon Black, Silence, and CrowdStrike, at a price that is lower than any of those individual licenses. And like I said, Bitdefender listens to their customers and they are responsive.

Karambir: Hi, my name's Karambir. I'm the CEO of a small company. It's just me actually, and I give CloudFlare a four. I found out about CloudFlare. I don't remember exactly how, but it was either through email or internet search, just about this product that was helpful for managing websites, and handling caching, and 24/7 availability, that kind of thing. I chose CloudFlare because it was free. At the time it seemed to be the only product. It was something I could easily create an account for, and it met the basic needs of a small website, which is just making sure it's available all the time, and reasonably good caching and throughput. It was fairly easy to get started with. CloudFlare, you have to switch over your DNA name servers, so it requires some technical experience, but otherwise, it was fairly easy to get set up. Okay, so if you're considering getting CloudFlare, consider it's really designed for higher end websites, with a lot of users, maybe multiple servers spread around the globe. For a smaller organization or just like a one-off website, it may be more complex than you really need. So it depends on the size of your organization, how much traffic, how much web traffic you have.