Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
OpenClinica Unite supports 13 of the nation’s largest healthcare networks encompassing over 300 site locations. Rapidly growing, we expect to double our reach early in 2023.
TrialKit is ideal for CROs and sponsors seeking a compliant, comprehensive, and mobile-friendly platform to collect and manage clinical data, specifically for virtual/remote trials.
They are very supportive of our changing needs, and this solution provided robust core EDC system as a very cost effective option for our growing data management programs.
Furthermore, using the CRF is not intuitive at all. I am quite disappointed.
OC4 is extremely user friendly for both administrators and users. The study build is straight forward, allowing for powerful eCRFs to be designed, developed and validated with ease.
I have trouble with using it on different internet browsers.
OpenClinica is a responsive and supportive company, run by people who are smart, adaptable, and interested in creating new and compliant solutions at the leading edge of the industry.
Compatibility with browsers other than IE is a major problem. In-Flexibility in changing CRF versions.
There is openness to feedback on what can be improved within the system and there is typically good communication with the person helping with the form designs. Sites find the system very easy to use.
The built in edit checks/constraints are very limited in what they can do.
So far it has been amazing. The personal support and interaction of everyone I have worked with to date has been great.
Dealing with Clinical Studio and, by extension, the support staff has been a lesson in abject frustration. It is one of the most bug-filled, poorly written programs I have ever had to deal with.
They are so receptive and eager to please they are willing to update their software to make it easier for their customers. The actual EDC is so easy to use, our clients love it.
I used TrialKit before TrialKit AI became available. At the time, some of the reporting functionality was cumbersome, making it more difficult to capture key performance metrics for our trial.
We're thrilled to have this platform as one of the solutions we can offer to our clients.
Lack payment report (list format only which can be used to build your report).
They incorporate new features as we need them and seem to have great synergy between their development and support teams. They treat us like a partner versus a customer and we love that.
The only thing I don't like is on the dashboard report you cannot filter by more than one site at a time.
OpenClinica
TrialKit
Top FeaturesOpenClinica
--
TrialKit
--
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: