Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology. Learn more.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Cartegraph Asset Management is trusted by hundreds of cities, counties, states, special districts, utilities, and parks across the U.S.
Organizations seeking custom data solutions with less risk. Fieldshare offers deep configuration to help your workflow right off-the-shelf (OTS), with the option to extend into custom development.
One of the strengths of the software is its flexibility, allowing users to customize it to their specific needs. This ability to personalize the software can be very useful.
The most frustrating thing that continues to be a headache is the integration with our public facing work order software, Accela. The software's do not communicate well with each other.
We have been very pleased with the overall experience. Customer Service with Cartegraph is very good, and they are just as invested in your success as you are.
There are many glitches and a lot of data is lost due to this.
Success with asset management starts with good data in the field, and only with that clean data, can admin successfully evaluate programs and changes.
Most all of my users are not able to make their own reports due to how difficult they are to build.
I continue to appreciate the far-ranging usefulness of the Structure, Automation, and Asset Condition Managers.
The organizations experience with Cartegraph has been challenging. The system is not the easiest to use due to the many different components and constant upgrades that sometimes is hard to keep up.
Fieldshare is a great way to track our sites and costs associated with them. The ability to store documents directly within the system is an advantage as well.
Sometimes, access problem and lagging occur. May be my PC conditions).
We are able to accurately capture our ARO and make and track changes live as work in the field is completed, leading to better communication and reporting of progress.
Lack of integration with other systems - PowerBI, AFE Navigator, OpenInvoice/OpenTicket.
It is an easy way to share real time information with the client and the interactive map gives great visuals for grouping work and confirming locations.
Any features missing from the program have been able to be adapted around, or customized by the FS team.
I also appreciate the ability to create custom forms such as Daily Field Reports or Change of Scope forms, as an example.
Prioritize real-user-identified key features according to your needs to find your best fit.
Cartegraph Asset Management
Top FeaturesFieldshare
Cartegraph Asset Management
--
Fieldshare
--
Talk with a software expert for free. Get a list of software that’s great for you in less than 15 minutes.
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: