Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Abstract management solution designed for professional conference organizers (PCOs), charities, association management organizations, and academic institutions.
Event planners and managers from academia, industry-leading organizations, international institutions, event agencies, and everyone who wishes to host an engaging and fully-branded event!
It has been terrific after learning the ins and outs of the program. Has been great for our membership, committee, etc. to view and access the abstract information.
Difficult to navigate between parts, mostly acceding only by link more than through the tool.
Oxford abstracts is a great product. User friendly, excellent product to share with other potential clients/reviewers.
Because of limited budget we opted for basic package, and later on missed some of the functionalities available in upgraded packages. Definitively will consider using it again.
I like its flexibility, and user friendliness which was the case for authors and reviewers, because there were minimum of users that needed additional help to use it.
There are several places to hold data about an abstract and sometimes trying to combine data from 2 different areas is rather difficult.
Great feedback from reviewers of abstracts saying it was easy to use. Options to download specific reports such as sumamrising presenters by country helpful.
Some registrants got confused that you had to register for oxford abstracts and then register again for the actual conference.
I would recommend them to anyone asking me which platform to use because they have a great team and their solution is solid and fun to use.
As soon as I have more info on that, I will pass that on. There seem to be some errors sometimes.
It seems much more personal than simply using Zoom, and it looks better. The video posting capability was useful, the tables for coffee and meals were really nice, the welcome video was great.
The variety of set ups is very diverse and made it difficult for us to find the right one at a glance.
The platform is very intuitive and easy to understand for any user. Furthermore, the interface is very nice and clean and is limited to the essential content.
But we are all just human and have only a limited amount of time.
Scoocs had a nice agenda representation and overall good options to customize the surface.
The chat really has been the most problematic issue up to now.
Oxford Abstracts
SCOOCS
Top FeaturesOxford Abstracts
--
SCOOCS
--
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: