QT9 QMS vs SafetyNet: Which is a better fit?

This really helps helps with implementation, and ease of use. I appreciate the stops built into the system to ensure important aspects are included in these records.

However, all records between complaints, corrective actions, and non-conformances are linked through a daisy chain scenario, but it can be awkward when retrieving records during an audit.

It provides the basics for the management of the quality for a small scale company at a good price. The pricing options are very good and adjustable.

I had myself and one other person approving a risk and the other approver approved the risk and I could not make any changes. I had to delete the entire risk action and start over.

From demo to deployment, the team at QT9 has supported me with each step of the process. Ongoing training and support has made the rapid deployment seamless and successful.

The calibration module was the most difficult for us to implement as it operated a differently than the other modules.

The software is good and the staff is more than happy to help if you have a problem.

The collaboration feature was a little difficult to implement for our organization as we didn't find that it was very intuitive.

Having a variety of ways to present date is great, and I am loving VITA. As I learn more and more about SmartWork, I am liking more and more.

The update time of 10am EST/EDT makes it tough to start working with current numbers first thing in the morning.

I love that Safety Net and Predictive Solutions are growing and expanding on reporting options.

I love how accessible the observation/audit system is for my team in the field, and how customized it can be.

I like the ability to drill down to my safety inspections happening across my network.