QT9 QMS vs Trackmedium QMS: Which is a better fit?

This really helps helps with implementation, and ease of use. I appreciate the stops built into the system to ensure important aspects are included in these records.

However, all records between complaints, corrective actions, and non-conformances are linked through a daisy chain scenario, but it can be awkward when retrieving records during an audit.

It provides the basics for the management of the quality for a small scale company at a good price. The pricing options are very good and adjustable.

I had myself and one other person approving a risk and the other approver approved the risk and I could not make any changes. I had to delete the entire risk action and start over.

From demo to deployment, the team at QT9 has supported me with each step of the process. Ongoing training and support has made the rapid deployment seamless and successful.

The calibration module was the most difficult for us to implement as it operated a differently than the other modules.

The software is good and the staff is more than happy to help if you have a problem.

The collaboration feature was a little difficult to implement for our organization as we didn't find that it was very intuitive.

Our organization loves this system and so do our customers and external auditors. It has allowed us to gain new business with how impressed the customers have been.

Can be a little difficult for regular users to interact with the platform.

Overall experience is great. I would recommend this software to any quality professional.

Option lists registered in list not flexible enough to maintain the list.

Very helpful, very friendly, very responsive, fairly priced for what is provided.

With a bit of polish it could be a decent product, but unfortunately is let down by the user interface for those using infrequently.

It is customizable and easy to learn. The customer service is very responsive and helpful.