Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Small and medium sized practices in ambulatory setup
physicians, physician executives, clinical managers, practice managers, office administrators, healthcare executives, c-levels, hospital administrators, nurse practitioners, physician assistants
We love a lot about this software and how it has optimized our buisness- the calendar is beautiful and the features are very thoughtful.
This is a misleading question. My experience of the software.
I went from a totally paper practice to Charm, and could only do so because of the reasonable cost of Charm. I am more organized and can respond to my patients as I should in the electronic era.
WE ARE STILL HAVING ISSUES WITH BILLING AND CAN'T GET ANYONE FROM THEIR CUSTOMER SERVICE TO RESPOND. THEY CHARGED US $3000 TO TRANSFER PATIENT DATA FROM OUR OLD SYSTEM.
Charm is a user friendly, patient friendly, online EMR system. It has many different features that help to automate many tedious tasks and help take the burden off of smaller clinics/teams.
There is no orders tab, no diagnostic testing tab. Everything that is a task, can be completed, but not deferred or deleted if not performed.
Overall I am very pleased with charm. It is ease to use, offers lots of reports and analytics, and everything is contained.
I really can't think of anything that we disliked.
I have appreciated that AH has very experienced success managers who are there to keep me efficient and always improving.
Now, they refuse to reimburse money they took (deposit) which was supposed to be refundable... despite having no right to it (supposed to be charged a percentage of charges collected right).
The customer service department and our implementation team were beyond helpful. We appreciate that Athena is ever changing, and always looking to improve the ease of business and quality of care.
Many templates were lost during one of their upgrades without warning so it has been difficult to rebuild them.
We are a long term user of EMRs and have found Athena to be the best by far of any we have used. Their reporting tool is better than any we have seen before and their on-going support is great.
Disregarding the harm they have done to their client and continuing to subject them to undue physical, emotional, and financial stress is just wrong.
The most I like is that we have help sorting out messages from pharmacies and faxes to each provider. It's also super easy to prescribe medications.
Reporting limitations and inability to do customizations and unable to require data to be completed in encounter notes.
Matthew: Hi. My name is Matthew. I'm a pediatrician, and I give ChARM EHR a rating of five. We've looked at a number of different EHRs in our quest for a sophisticated but easy-to-use program. We were using Practice Fusion, but after the cost got prohibitive and the software not really that functional, we started looking for some other avenues. We looked at Kareo, we looked at AdvancedMD, and we looked at Amazing Charts. Those were the three big ones that we looked at. All of them were very good, but they were either cost-prohibitive or too complex and not easy to use via the scheduler or to be putting in notes. ChARM EHR was one of the ones that we looked at, and it really fit the bill perfectly. It's, was easily customizable, and the cost, because we have a small practice, was very low. It did what we had to do. It was very user-friendly. The scheduler was easy to use. Plus, it gave me an app on my phone to look at my schedule on a daily basis. Couldn't ask for any more than that. ChARM was very easy to implement in the office since it was cloud-based. We were able to input most of the data very, very easily since we have a small practice, but the user interface was very user-friendly. It didn't require a lot of time, and because it was cloud-based, it could be done from various locations, both from my office and from my receptionist's home if we had to. So the onboarding and the implementation was very, very quick and easy. We found ChARM EHR to be a good fit for our practice, because it was relatively small, and the cost was minimum. However, if your practice is a large practice, the cost may get prohibitive. The ChARM EHR program is very easily user-friendly. It's customizable, and it is pinpointed for any particular practice, whether it be pediatrics, family medicine, general medicine. The varied templates that are there are easily customizable. Their software support is excellent. They get back to you very quickly. So I really recommend it highly for anyone that has a practice that is relatively small, that needs a user-friendly program, and it's easily customizable.
Katie: My name is Katie. I am the office director at Behavioral Health Clinic. We are about 20 staffs and my rating for athenaOne, the EHR/EMR system, is a five. Before the owner psychiatrist bridged off to start his own clinic and use athenaOne, we used a system at our old clinic. I don't know remember the name. It was from 1997, and it was F1s, F11s, F12s, and it was very, very old school, not a lot of information, and definitely needed an update. The owner and medical director psychiatrist chose athenaOne. Once he chose the system to use, I was the one that helped onboard and set up the entire system for scheduling, credentialing, insurance payers, adding schedules, doing all the portal settings, et cetera, like that. So I'm assuming he chose the platform, because it is such a nice interface and everything flows really well. To get started with athenaOne, it was actually pretty easy on certain platform systems for different departments, such as scheduling, setting up schedules, transferring patients. I know we had a little blip with the adding the insurance payers and the credentialing portion based off the account manager were provided. Granted, we were also in the middle of COVID, July 2020, so the blip was on both sides, but it was pretty easy after a couple months of what we got used to. And then once in-house staff used athena more often, we got used to all the settings, and we were able to internally figure out and troubleshoot with one another. The advice I would give for any company or clinic that is considering using athenaOne, I would give them that everything is all accessible inside athenaOne. You have scheduling. You have insurance verifications. You have portal messages. You have reports you can run. You can send out automatic email campaigns to patients. You can customize that even, so it's not going to all patients, it can only go to certain patients of the day. Here in Minnesota, we have snowstorms, so if patients are coming in the afternoon, we can set a little blip to be sent out to all the patients in the afternoon that we are closing early because of all the snow coming. And now, we don't have to manually sit and call every single patient, so it's all beautifully laid out in each tab in interface.
CharmHealth
Top FeaturesathenaOne
Talk with a software expert for free. Get a list of software that’s great for you in less than 15 minutes.
Products similar to those you're currently comparing: