--- title: "Claude Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra" description: "Is Claude the right Generative AI solution for you? Explore 52 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice." source_url: "https://www.capterra.com/p/10011218/Claude/reviews/" page_type: "reviews" language: "en" --- Claude 4.4 (52) [View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/10011218/Claude/alternatives/) Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) * * * Last updated July 20th, 2026 # Reviews of Claude Ease of use 4.6 Customer Service 3.9 ## Pros and Cons in Reviews JV Jordan V Sales SpecialistComputer Software, 201 - 500 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “What I like about Claude is its ability to generate thoughtful, well-structured responses and handle complex prompts with a great level of detail.“ June 1, 2026 DV Dave V Lead DeveloperInformation Technology and Services, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “It feels disingenuous to long time customers to slowly shrink the service while also trying to increase prices. If claude has an error, it can eat up a bunch of tokens and you're stuck until they refresh with no help from customer service.“ November 24, 2025 GA George A FounderInformation Technology and Services, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: 6-12 months. “It handles context well, maintaining coherence across longer exchanges, and can shift between formal and casual tones appropriately. When I need detailed, structured information, Claude delivers that; when I need quick, straightforward answers, it adapts accordingly.“ November 9, 2025 Suraj J Embedded EngineerElectrical/Electronic Manufacturing, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “Doesn't have minimum free usage for IDE , bit costly than others.“ March 27, 2026 JV Jordan V Sales SpecialistComputer Software, 201 - 500 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “I’ve found it particularly useful when working through complex business topics or organizing large amounts of information into concise, actionable insights.“ June 1, 2026 Marc R Digital Media SpecialistEducation Management, 1,001 - 5,000 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “It tends to produce responses that feel very clear, well-reasoned, and balanced, especially when working through complex topics or nuanced questions.“ May 15, 2026 ## Showing most helpful reviews Showing 1-25 of 52 Reviews Sort by: Most Helpful Rating Company Size Reviewer's Role Length of Use Frequency of Use Balram T. AI developer Computer Software Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Claude AI: Best for Debugging and Building New Features Faster" August 10, 2026 4.0 There are many things where Claude AI helping us in solving 1)Coding and debugging -: As it has huge accuracy in coding then other models so we always prefer claude ai for that. As i said if i need to develop any functionality or lets say mcp for something it is helping us doing that quickly. The best part is , it understand user instructions very carefully , it helps us in debuuging issue and help us getting production ready code. 2)Connectors-: As it has good number of default connectors so it can easily connect our tools like jira or microsoft365 or even external mcp. So because of that we are able to understand things quickly , for example if any jira user story is going on it can connect understand context and will provide us next action , and who will do that. 3)As we can integrate it with vs code or even github so it easy to get understnading of code , or github repo which is helping us quikly to undertand someone's repo if we are new to them. Overall, there are a lot of things we can achieve with Claude AI, and it helps us work faster with accuracy. Pros there are 2 major thing i like about Claude AI 1) I have tried many LLM like openai models , xAI but Claude AI is best , being developed it helping in debugging our code issue like real peer , with detail and correct explantion , if we need to develop any new functionality then claude ai is the first choise. 2) The best part is it has good default connector which can connect to our application and then we can do our work more faster. for example i can connect microsoft365 with claude and becaus eof that i get email updated in simple terms , like if there any requirement , claude ai explaing it very clearly and even helping me what to reply , any follow up and all. Cons 2 things i dont like about claude AI 1) Cost it charge a lot as per token , for example i have given 100$ token to use per month by my organisation , and just doing one project like creating mcp for some automation or debugging it cost me around 12$ 2)Second sometimes when I am delaing with large files structure , it forgets context and then explicity i have to tell files name and all. Review Source MB Mark B. Manager Retail Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "The best AI service" August 10, 2026 5.0 My overall experience with Claude has been consistently excellent. It has become one of the tools I reach for most, quietly handling writing, analysis, and problem-solving without ever feeling like a hassle to use. Pros Claude has quickly become one of the most useful tools in my daily workflow, and its ease of use is a big part of that. There's no learning curve to speak of, you simply type what you need in plain language and get a thoughtful, well-structured response back. The quality of the writing assistance stands out the most: whether I'm drafting professional documents, cleaning up emails, or working through longer reports, the output is clear, natural, and genuinely usable with minimal editing. It handles nuance well and pushes back or asks for clarification when something is ambiguous, which I appreciate. On the technical side, it's surprisingly capable with data tasks and coding, walking through problems step by step rather than just spitting out an answer. Collaboration feels conversational, I can refine and iterate on something over several messages and it keeps track of the context without me having to re-explain. It's also strong at handling documents and files, pulling out what matters and reorganizing information cleanly. The responses are fast and consistent, and the tone adapts to whatever I'm working on, from casual notes to formal correspondence. Overall it saves me a considerable amount of time across a wide range of tasks and rarely misses the mark. Cons There honestly isn't much to fault here, which is a good sign. Nothing has stood out as a significant drawback during my time using Claude, and the occasional small limitation has never been enough to get in the way of what I'm trying to accomplish. Switched from [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com/p/10009334/ChatGPT/) The price and consistency of ChatGPT was not best suited to my work. Review Source MB Mark B. Founder and Software Engineer Information Services Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "The worst AI experience I have had" April 15, 2026 1.0 HORRIBLE!! Who cares if the AI is good at anything if it loses your work and then tells you that you've hit your daily limit after 10 minutes. And their policy that you can only cancel the renewal and not get your money back is disgusting! If I had known they were this bad, I never would have given them my money in the first place. Pros It wrote one paper very well. It was on the longer side but it did well gathering the content and "sounding like a human." Cons It was almost impossible to get it to connect. It LOST projects - twice I had to recreate a project. And the usage limits were ridiculously low. I was listed as a Pro and in less than 10 minutes of work, I had reached my daily limit. I also had problems with authenticating. It would text me a code, I would copy and paste it in and it would say it's wrong and that I can come back and try again later. Switched from [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com/p/10009334/ChatGPT/) I had heard a lot of good reviews about Claude. I will be going back to ChatGPT though. Even if Claude is the better product, it is too unstable and it's daily limits are STUPIDLY low. I AM ANGRY!!! Review Source GZM Gina Zoie M. Founder Health, Wellness and Fitness Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Claude is the Best AI for Writing, Full Stop!" June 2, 2026 5.0 I use Claude daily to help run my online business, creating blog articles and social media content. I also use Claude for personal reasons, like creating a running training schedule and productivity management. I've thoroughly enjoyed learning and working with the tool. Highly recommend. Pros Claude is the best AI to use if you want to enhance your writing. It has the most natural and human writing style of the AI tools I've tried, and I've tried them all. Claude only gets better with use, as it learns your voice and writing style. It helps save an enormous amount of time with online content creation. Cons I don't have any negatives, other than the Enterprise level can be expensive. But this is the case with most AI tools in the market. Switched from [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com/p/10009334/ChatGPT/) I heard from other content creators that Claude was better at writing, with a more natural and human style. Review Source Tracie B. Executive Director Non-Profit Organization Management Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Great tool with the paid subscription!" April 18, 2026 4.0 Good! I am about to customize response language and response information on Claude with the correct prompts and information. This product is intuitive and easy to use. For the paid subscription you do get more responses and better quality copy and image creation. Pros Claude is thorough when given the right prompts, can be customized to your needs, and is easy to use for basic features immediately. I was able to just start typing my question and prompts into Claude and received immediate, relevant responses. Cons Claude only produces a small amount of responses in the free version. Users have to be at least $20 a month to make this product useful. Switched from [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com/p/10009334/ChatGPT/) Recommendation from a colleague based on her experience Review Source Tanveer K. Student Higher Education Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Claude made my daily work much easier" March 19, 2026 5.0 My overall experience with claude has been very positive. it became part of my daily workflow. the responses are accurate, well structured and easy to understand. I would highly recommend it to students, and professionals who want a smart AI assistant to boost their productivity. Pros I am using claude for the past 5 months for research and summarizing long documents. it understood my queries in hindi and english mixed languages very well. when I asked it to help me write an emails, it gave me multiple options to choose from which saved me a lot of time Cons sometimes the responses are a bit detailed than needed for simple questions, but still it is actually helpful for complex topics. the free version has a daily usage limit which just makes me want to upgrade to the paid plans as the tool is very useful. Switched from [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com/p/10009334/ChatGPT/) because i found Claude's responses more accurate, detailed and natural. It handles long documents and complex queries much better in my experience. it understands context more effectively during long conversations without losing track. Review Source Suraj J. Embedded Engineer Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Bit costly but , the best there is." March 27, 2026 5.0 I have built and created many things with it. I haven't seen any other competitor come closer when comes to its practical usabilty. Pros I really like the claude opus model they are a notch up above others. Even when you read its thought process it makes contradiction to its thinking , it explores every possible solution and remove one by one thinking how it could go wrong . I mean it's really impressive even for software engineer. Cons It's limit get exhausted quickly for it your heavy user with many high quality prompt. Doesn't have minimum free usage for IDE , bit costly than others. Switched from [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com/p/10009334/ChatGPT/) The chatgpt answer were more generic and it sometimes hallucinate and could not get out of it. i tried claude once after that the respose from claude was way better quality than chatgpt . Review Source Saiprasad A. Consultant Financial Services Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Precise, Reliable Results That Just Work" May 28, 2026 5.0 Overall a great and pleasant experience. It ensures my requirements are met properly and gives me the desired output. Only one issues that I faced is in the case of consumption of tokens as said earlier. Pros It simply does what it’s supposed to do, and it does it with a lot of precision. The solutions it provides are really great and feel reliable. Overall, I had a great experience using it. Cons If you ask it to generate any UI, the result is very generic, and it’s easy to tell the UI was designed using Claude. It also consumes tokens very quickly; sometimes, even a simple query ends up depleting far too many tokens. Switched from [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com/p/10009334/ChatGPT/) The output the claude provides in case of coding related queries is very much better as compared with Chatgpt. Review Source Jesse Z. Software Engineer Computer Software Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Great Tool For Everyday General Use Not So Good With Code Generation" July 24, 2026 5.0 Claude has been a great tool to go to if I have questions or want to generate PowerPoints or help debug my code. However, it is not very good with helping generate code as it lacks context with the codebase in the environment you have integrated it with. Pros There are many models provided for users that support a variety of needs from generating code, presentations, and even debugging and solving tricky problems. Additionally, it is easy for organizations and groups to set up an enterprise environment to provide premium features for employees or group members without them individually having to pay for the services. Cons The freemium model provides very few features for users and the rate limit is far too low and takes too long to reset. Additionally, Claude Code when running the orchestration, often generates code that is inefficient and not best practice as it doesn't fully understand the codebase. Review Source SH Spencer H. Software Developer Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Claude Code is your coding pal" July 23, 2026 5.0 Pros It is quick to respond so it feels like I have a coding buddy in real-time. I love being able to manage multiple files at once which makes the coding experience smooth. Cons At times, Claude gives responses that are too detailed and it takes a while to get the main point. While other LLMs hallucinate, Claude misses context sometimes if the questions are not worded exactly right. Review Source TC Tommaso C. Head of Brand and Innovation Design Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "A humanistic AI chatbot rich in language management" October 2, 2024 5.0 A great AI chatbot if you favor richness of content over technical skills. What it does, it does very well. Pros Richer language. Great humanistic approach. Less lists, more concepts. Cons No image generation integrated. For the rest a great solution. Switched from [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com/p/10009334/ChatGPT/) I liked more the language management by Claude over chatGPT. The text is richer and more consistent. Review Source Leandro A. Developer Computer Software Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Claude IA Review" December 18, 2025 5.0 Amazing.Claude IA improves my workflow significantly .I am using free tier and is more than enough for me .It is easy to use too Pros I use Claude free tier , great value for money , it helps me write code .This IA es very clever , it also helps me refactorize codebases Cons I don't have a single complain .I am using free tier .I never get out of tokens .And it is very smart. Review Source VR Verified Reviewer Analyst Financial Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Good AI tool for research (overall) and drafting" March 7, 2025 4.0 Overall its good. I use it majorly for summarising long contents. Pros Good AI tool for summarising long paragraphs, analyse complex data, effective rephrasing and impactful writing. It also helps in writing codes, excel formulas, and assist in business research Cons Major problem is hallucinations with data (specially with numbers) Another issue is word limits - If user uploads pdf and try to ask questions on that pdf - it says your work limit reached. So its difficult to use it for pdf queries. Third is knowledge cut-off till October 2024 Review Source VR Verified Reviewer Technical Director Religious Institutions Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "I'm sure its for some people but not me" December 16, 2025 3.0 Overall when I demoed this it did not perform as well for me as the other Large language models out there right now. Pros I am not a fan of this one and I use a lot. I feel like its good for coding and copyright but not too much else. Cons I really do not like the way they handle context limits, you will be writing and working and something and have to start a new chat. Review Source LZ Lucila Z. Freelancer Design Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Excelentes respuestas" December 2, 2024 5.0 Pros Estoy sorprendida con Claude, el procesamiento de sus respuestas es muy acertado y muy natural. Además, en el tema de códigos de programación también es una maravilla. Lo utilizo para la redacciones de textos, guiones y resúmenes de informas, así como para realizar revisiones de mis proyectos de programación. Cons solo una sugerencia, pueden ser mas ordenados en el historial de chats, la primera vez no entendía donde lo encontraba, y quizás sea un inconveniente para nuevos usuarios, por lo demás Claude está genial Review Source CR Chris R. Chief of Strategy Marketing and Advertising Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "A Mighty Fine, albeit Flawed, AI" November 12, 2024 4.0 I tend not to use AI unless a client specifically requests it. In those cases, I have enjoyed Claude's natural language and range of options and copy, as well as analysis. It's rarely "final" quality, but it usually gives me something good to work with. Pros I really dig claude's ability to learn from my prompts. I'm usually able to get what I want from the AI within 2 prompts. Cons The inability to learn between "chats" as well as the discouragement from "long" chats, means I have to retrain Claude on a topic every time I start a new project chat. Review Source SR Sadekur R. Software Developer Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Perfect AI companion tool for human" July 29, 2024 5.0 Helped me on my personal and professional life too by enhancing my knowledge, showing me real learning path, creating routine or doing automation of my task. Pros Claude feels me like I am talking to a real person who is so much smart. It is realistic and answer my query honestly. I get mostly accurate answer from it. Cons As it's still on learning, results may not be 100% accurate all the time. Review Source Nasrullah A. Computer Engineer Automotive Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "A Smart and Reliable AI Assistant with Room to Grow" May 2, 2026 5.0 Overall, my experience with Claude has been very positive. It’s a reliable and smart tool that helps me get things done efficiently. While there’s room for improvement in making interactions feel more casual, Claude’s accuracy and helpfulness make it a great companion for both work and personal use. Pros I really appreciated how intuitive and easy to use Claude is. It felt like having a helpful assistant who understands my needs quickly and provides thoughtful, clear responses. The way it handles complex questions with simplicity impressed me the most. Cons Sometimes, Claude’s responses can be a bit too formal or cautious, which makes the conversation feel less natural. I wish it could be a little more relaxed and conversational at times. Review Source Jhon Jaiver S. Developer Program Development Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "La mejor app para crear software personalizado con IA" April 17, 2026 5.0 todo muy bien hecho, uso la herramienta CLI y la de escritorio, podido realizar muchos programas en muy poco tiempo Pros es lo mejor que han inventado realmente me encanta, mi productividad y desempeño ha mejorado al usar claude Cons creo que el consumo de tokens por session, hay que esperar a veces para poder seguir usando la aplicacion Alternatives considered [Gemini](https://www.capterra.com/p/10020130/Gemini/) Reason for choosing Claude por que tienen los modelos de Ia mas potentes del mercado Switched from [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com/p/10009334/ChatGPT/) por que los modelos de chatgpt no tenia para código y son muy lentos, los que ahora usan no me convencen. Review Source Marc R. Digital Media Specialist Education Management Used the software for: 2+ years ### "A Wonderful AI Thought Partner " May 15, 2026 5.0 My overall experience with Claude has been positive, particularly when it comes to clear, thoughtful communication and structured responses. It consistently delivers content that is logically organized and easy to follow, which is helpful for tasks like writing, brainstorming, and unpacking complex ideas. The tone is another strong point. It feels measured, calm, and considerate, which makes interactions feel collaborative and professional. Pros What stands out most about Claude is its thoughtful, structured approach to communication. It tends to produce responses that feel very clear, well-reasoned, and balanced, especially when working through complex topics or nuanced questions. Its ability to organize ideas logically makes it particularly strong for tasks like writing, brainstorming, or refining messaging. Cons One area where Claude can sometimes fall short is in being overly cautious or generalized in its responses. While that careful tone can be a strength, it occasionally leads to answers that feel a bit less direct or actionable, especially when you’re looking for clear, decisive recommendations or more tailored insights. Review Source Ronak K. Chief Technology Officer Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Exceptional Coder with Missing Multimedia Capabilities." May 2, 2026 5.0 Claude is an incredibly intelligent, secure and quite eloquent tool. In case you absolutely demand text and sophisticated code generation, it is unbeatable and duly simple to operate. Nevertheless, those who require a multimedia aspect being integrated in digital creation like creating videos or images, they need to seek alternative suppliers. Pros Claude is worth millions with its second to none code generation and the ease of use it is very easy to use. Next to code previewing, its Artifacts feature features smooth previewing. I greatly appreciate the extreme customization that Projects can provide, enabling custom outputs. On top of that, their customer service remains convenient, and their model has a clever writing that always beats competition, making it my preferred daily AI user to do all the tricky logical, analytic and software development jobs effectively day in and day out. Cons The greatest drawback is the entire lack of native image generating and video creation tools. It is contrary to the rival sites where it is possible to develop multimedia content. The creation of the coding is excellent, although occasionally, the workflow can be disrupted as the top-tier is overutilized and the perceived value might be lowered somewhat. Review Source Jerrid C. CEO Computer Software Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "The "Lean AI" Powerhouse: Solving the Scaling Paradox with Agentic Infrastructure" April 8, 2026 4.0 Claude has solved the “scaling paradox” for my boutique consulting firm. It reduced my discovery phase from five days of stakeholder meetings to about two hours of transcript synthesis, letting me maintain a $2,000–$5,000 per-deliverable rate with a 5x faster turnaround than traditional agencies. I use Claude over 8 hours a day. In my Strategy pillar, it acts as a fractional Account Manager, drafting complex technical pivots for clients while preserving a partnership-first tone. In my Build pillar, it serves as a Senior Architect, handling the heavy lifting of zero-downtime cloud migrations. Claude doesn’t just generate text; it behaves like an agentic partner that actively catches architectural drift. For a solo operator, it’s the difference between the capacity of one person and the effective output of a three-person team. Pros Claude’s most transformative feature is its high-fidelity agentic orchestration. As a solo consultant overseeing mid-market enterprise migrations, I rely on Claude as a virtual team member rather than a basic chatbot. Extensive context handling: The 200,000-token context window significantly improves my discovery-to-PRD workflow. I can upload a 45-minute discovery call transcript and over 15 pages of legacy API documentation, and Claude synthesizes a technical PRD that is approximately 90% client-ready in less than 30 minutes. Architectural integrity: Unlike other models that produce disorganized output, Claude consistently follows my Model Context Protocol (MCP) and CLAUDE.md instructions. This allows me to enforce strict TypeScript and ESLint standards across multiple files, ensuring the resulting code is production-grade and enterprise-ready. Strategic auditing: I use Claude as a Chief of Staff to identify unspoken technical debt. It applies Socratic questioning to challenge my architectural decisions before migration, resulting in approximately a 40% reduction in deployment-time bugs. Cons While Claude is effectively my primary operating system for thought, there are a few friction points in a high-scale professional workflow: Context window management: Even with a 200k context window, during deep build phases with huge monorepos, I need to be strategic about which files I expose. Otherwise, it’s easy to hit rate limits during sustained 8-hour workdays. UI vs. terminal split: The web interface is excellent for strategy work, but I want tighter integration between Claude AI (web) and Claude Code (CLI). Maintaining seamless contextual continuity between a strategic email thread and a terminal-based refactor would further streamline my workflow. Review Source VR Verified Reviewer Sales Specialist Computer Software Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Excellent AI Assistant for Research, Writing, and Business Productivity" June 1, 2026 5.0 I use Claude to help research prospective partners, summarize company information, refine outreach messaging, draft emails, and brainstorm strategies for account engagement. It has become a valuable productivity tool that helps reduce time spent on repetitive tasks while improving the quality of research and communication. I’ve found it particularly useful when working through complex business topics or organizing large amounts of information into concise, actionable insights. For professionals looking to improve efficiency, writing quality, and research capabilities, Claude is a powerful AI assistant that delivers significant value. Pros What I like about Claude is its ability to generate thoughtful, well-structured responses and handle complex prompts with a great level of detail. I use Claude regularly to assist with business research, drafting cold emails, and refining sales messaging. I also like how well it processes large amounts of information and summarizes documents, helping save significant time when reviewing reports, notes, or lengthy content. Cons Claude's free version has a very specific limit on how many messages you can send. So you are forced to upgrade to the Pro plan especially if you use Claude often. Review Source JC Jacqueline C. Beauty Futures Brand Design Strategist Cosmetics Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "My Personal Assistant " August 12, 2026 5.0 I use it daily to flush out ideas for my marketing efforts. It’s learnt my writing style and is quite good at capturing my cadence. Pros I like that it can act like my personal assistant to help me organise my day and complete the tasks I need to do for the day. Cons I don’t care for its design capabilities, it’s really generic design unless you give it an excellent example or write an extensive design brief. Switched from [Gemini](https://www.capterra.com/p/10020130/Gemini/) I found the writing on Gemini quite sterile and more repetitive where it all sounds the same. Review Source GA George A. Founder Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Perfect AI companion tool for human" November 9, 2025 5.0 My experience with Claude has been notably productive and versatile. Throughout our interactions, Claude has served as a multifaceted tool that adapts to whatever task I bring to it, whether that involves creative writing, technical problem-solving, or analytical thinking. What strikes me most about using Claude is its conversational approach. Rather than feeling like I'm simply querying a database, the interactions feel collaborative. Claude asks clarifying questions when my requests are ambiguous, which has often helped me refine my own thinking about what I actually need. This back-and-forth has proven valuable not just for getting better outputs, but for developing clearer ideas in the first place. The breadth of Claude's capabilities has been impressive. I've used it for everything from drafting written content to breaking down complex concepts into understandable explanations. It handles context well, maintaining coherence across longer exchanges, and can shift between formal and casual tones appropriately. When I need detailed, structured information, Claude delivers that; when I need quick, straightforward answers, it adapts accordingly. That said, the experience isn't without limitations. Claude has a knowledge cutoff and sometimes requires additional verification for current events or highly specialized information. There are also tasks it simply won't do or areas where its responses feel overly cautious. But overall, as a thinking partner and productivity tool, my experience has been largely positive and useful. Pros Claude is probably the most intelligent AI model that I have ever used. It is extremely capable and can comprehend a lot of information. You can discuss with Claude a ton of different things, ranging from general advice to very particular ones, like how to communicate your brand values effectively and which word choice would make a better fit and why. Cons Eventually, after having used it a certain amount of time, was blocked by the daily limit, switched to another one just to realize that the answers from i.e. ChatGPT, were far more convincing and complete Switched from [ChatGPT](https://www.capterra.com/p/10009334/ChatGPT/) The hallucinations were too much for me. Review Source Similar Products Featured