Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Software that enables hundreds of content contributors to manage thousands of pages that receive millions of hits.
Provider
GOSS Interactive
Located In
United Kingdom
Foundation
1999
Open API
Unverified
Deployment
Cloud, SaaS, Web-Based
Platform featuring web analytics, social media, live chat, intranets and subsites developed for government organizations, developers and customers
Content Source: GOSS Platform
Based on other buyer's searches, these are the products that could be a good fit for you.
A product’s price can vary greatly based on features needed, support or training required, and customization requests. Some vendors want a chance to talk to you before being ruled out for pricing. When you find a product that fits your needs, you should talk to the vendor to figure out what they can offer.
GOSS Platform Reviews
"Great approval process"
Pros: Great customer support and always quick to respond to and resolve issues. Excellent approvals process which allows content to be marked with high, medium or low priority and allows the approver to edit the content before approving it.
Cons: Templates were quite restrictive, for example, you couldn't build a page using different elements - I think this was due to the version of iCM we were using though. There was no 'drag and drop' functionality and the document/media library was in a separate area of the CMS from the web pages and a bit clunky to use.