---
title: "Page 2 | Lever Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra"
description: "Page 2 - Is Lever the right Recruiting solution for you? Explore 654 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice."
source_url: "https://www.capterra.com/p/142452/Lever/reviews/?page=2"
page_type: "reviews"
language: "en"
publication_date: "2026-09-29"
---

Lever

4.6 (654)

[View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/142452/Lever/alternatives/)

Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/)

* * *

Last updated September 29th, 2026

# Page 2 - Reviews of Lever

## Showing most helpful reviews

Showing 26-50 of 654 Reviews

Sort by:

Most Helpful

Rating

Company Size

Reviewer's Role

Length of Use

Frequency of Use

Samanta J.  
Head of Talent Acquisition  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Clean UI and solid for scale, but pricey and not great support"

March 3, 2026

4.0

Before using Lever, we were relying on spreadsheets and a mix of disconnected tools to track candidates, which created a lot of noise and manual work. Lever solved the core problem of centralizing candidate data and hiring activity in 1 place, which immediately reduced coordination overhead. Having a single system made collaboration between recruiters and hiring managers much smoother, w/o constant back-and-forth or status updates. The built-in automations, particularly around follow-ups and routine tasks, removed a significant amount of admin work from the recruiting process. As a result, the team is more organized, spends less time managing processes, and more time on high-value work like candidate conversations and decision-making.

Pros

We use Lever as our ATS in a fast-moving, scaling environment where speed of setup and adoption were important. One of its biggest strengths is how clean and intuitive the interface is. Onboarding time was minimal, which mattered bc we needed to move quickly, and the initial setup didn’t require much external support. Lever became a core ops tool for us and is used daily. The customizable workflows and automations are particularly helpful when dealing with higher hiring volume, as they reduce manual coordination and help keep processes consistent across roles and teams. The LI integration works smoothly in practice, and the in-app support chat is useful for resolving small, tactical questions w/o slowing the team down. Overall, it provides enough structure and visibility to keep hiring on track without adding unnecessary complexity.

Cons

Customer support feels more reactive than proactive in our experience. Outside of renewal cycles, there is limited ongoing engagement, which makes the relationship feel transactional rather than advisory. Pricing can also be a constraint for smaller or earlier-stage teams. While the core product is strong, some advanced capabilities, particularly around reporting, come at an additional cost that may not be accessible to all teams, like ours. Finally, the latest analytics layout is difficult to use in practice. Getting to the data needed for day-to-day decision-making isn't always intuitive, and reporting requires more effort than expected unless you invest in higher-tier options.

Alternatives considered

[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

Visibility over complexity - Lever’s UX surfaces the right information without overwhelming.

Review Source

Haydin H.  
Owner  
Staffing and Recruiting  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Do not recommend - Terrible Support "

December 8, 2025

1.0

Not good. Would not recommend to anyone. Never got this up and going and never could get anyone to respond.

Pros

Did not have any pros. Support was unresponsive and did not meet the terms and conditions of the agreement.

Cons

Never got up and running support never reach out with 4 support tickets. Integrations never worked. Sales rep promises were never met.

Alternatives considered

[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

Thought it would be better but could not do what was promised

Switched from

[Workable](https://www.capterra.com/p/130175/Workable/)

Thought it would be better but could not do what was promised

Review Source

CD

Cara D.  
Recruiter  
Construction  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Lever, easy to use, easy to collaborate"

November 13, 2025

5.0

Lever provided our team with a great degree of communication, whether that was internally or externally, which played a crucial role in our recruitment processes.

Pros

Lever was very compatible with our teams outside of HR and recruiting, hiring managers were easy to collaborate with through Lever's features and interface. Overall, Lever was easy to use, even for those who were not trained on the platform.

Cons

Lever comes with some quirks with implementation, and there are certain features like filtering that I would like to see when considering the value for what you pay.

Alternatives considered

[Pinpoint](https://www.capterra.com/p/174069/Pinpoint/)

Reason for choosing Lever

Lever was a bit cheaper and seemed to fit our needs more adequately.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Senior Project Specialist  
Market Research  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Lever for job postings"

February 21, 2026

4.0

My company uses Lever to post open job positions for internal and external applicants and for applications.

Pros

It's quite simple to use and the interface is very straightforward. There are filters that you can use to filter the job postings by location, department, work type, etc. The application form is easy to pre-fill by uploading a CV. We also use it for our internal referral program.

Cons

The interface is too simple and a bit bland. I would add more design on the page. Otherwise, it has all the main functionality.

Review Source

RO

Reva O.  
Senior Recruiter  
Defense & Space  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Smooth Transition To New Lever ATS Platform"

July 11, 2025

4.0

\[sensitive content hidden\] have been great to work with, making the transition as seamless as possible. They have given us consistent support and assistance in guiding us through the process, and customizing it to our needs.

Pros

Ease of use. Fairly intuitive. We are able to complete tasks quicker. Posting jobs has been very efficient and easy to track in one place.

Cons

It does not carry over resume and notes when adding a candidate from LinkedIn Recruiter to Lever ATS

Alternatives considered

[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

Seemed like the best value of a platform that met our needs.

Switched from

[LinkedIn Recruiter](https://www.capterra.com/p/234965/LinkedIn-Recruiter/)

The Recruiter part of LinkedIn was going away.

Review Source

TH

Tabatha H.  
Director of Human Resources  
Hospital & Health Care  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Lever Should Integrate with HRIS systems Better"

May 8, 2025

3.0

It is okay. I can review the feedback notes, send rejection emails from the system. I like that it integrates with Recruitbot which helps with scraping information from the web on candidates.

Pros

I like that is tit serves a repository of information and allows for you to easily archive your candidates

Cons

I do not like that it is a standalone and does not integrate with Paycor or Paycom. This causes duplicity with entries. I also do not like that you cannot include additional documents such as health benefits information along with the offer letters. It only allows the offer to go out

Switched from

[Paycor](https://www.capterra.com/p/133745/Paycor-Perform/)

The system was not robust enough. Did not provide the correct tracking and reporting we need. Could not determine where the candidate was in the process

Review Source

GC

Genesis C.  
Talent and Retention Manager  
Mental Health Care  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Best Applicant Tracking System "

May 14, 2025

5.0

Very positive. Working with \[sensitive content hidden\] on the implementation of our new system was a great experience. He led the project with clarity, organization, and consistent support. \[sensitive content hidden\] kept everything on track, communicated effectively, and made sure the team felt informed and involved at every step. His calm, solutions-focused approach helped us navigate challenges smoothly, and his dedication played a big role in the successful rollout. I truly appreciated his leadership and would gladly work with him again.

Pros

User-friendly and easily organizes my recruitment process.

Cons

Inability to customize colors.

Alternatives considered

[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

User-friendly and familiarity.

Review Source

LH

Lainey H.  
Manager, Talent Acquisition  
E-Learning  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "It’s okay. "

April 1, 2025

3.0

It’s okay- looking back I would have just spent the extra money for greenhouse. Their customer service leaves a lot to be desired.

Pros

It’s pretty customizable, functionality is good for recruiters.

Cons

Frequent bugs/glitchy, reporting dashboard could be better, can’t attach word docs to the req requests so it’s inconvenient to have to copy and paste everything in a small box.

Alternatives considered

[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

Levers team came in with a better price.

Switched from

[Paycor](https://www.capterra.com/p/133745/Paycor-Perform/)

The previous system had extremely limited functionality

Review Source

EP

Evan P.  
Recruiter  
Financial Services  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Lever Rocks"

June 6, 2025

5.0

Support staff has been great, lightweight ATS that covers everything you want 1) Candidate and Job management, sourcing, integration with email/calendar, and sequencing emails

Pros

Ease of use, integrates well with scheduling/calendaring, candidate management, job posting integration to the site.

Cons

Reporting/Dashboards are trickier to learn. Still not quite there. The reporting functionality might be a bit too overdone. I'd think of ways to simplify it.

Switched from

[Google Sheets](https://www.capterra.com/p/169718/Google-Sheets/)

Because Google sheets isn't scalable for a full ats solution

Review Source

CS

Csilla S.  
Recruitment Team Lead  
Telecommunications  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Recruitment Team Leader"

May 15, 2025

5.0

Pros

easy to use but has so many features, what i like the most is the LinkedIn lever connection

Cons

at this point I am satisfied with everything

Alternatives considered

[Workable](https://www.capterra.com/p/130175/Workable/)[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

it was a better fit for us, price was lower

Switched from

[Microsoft 365](https://www.capterra.com/p/227157/Microsoft-365/)

it was never meant for recruitment, could advertise any job

Review Source

SK

Sarah K.  
People Operations Manager  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Good for smaller companies, but not advancing with the times"

July 8, 2025

3.0

Pros

Lever was a great introductory ATS for our company when we we smaller and growing, especially with a limited recruiting team.

Cons

Lever's functionality feels more limited than their competitors at this point. Compared to other ATS tools we're evaluating, the AI functionality is more limited, the native signature feature requires additional spend on DocuSign, and the integration with Rippling as an HRIS hasn't advanced over the years.

Review Source

AL

Andrii L.  
Senior strategist  
Industrial Automation  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "applicant tracking system and HR management tool"

February 14, 2025

5.0

Good, reliable solution for applicant tracking process. Priced for medium to large business and stays to be stable and reliable tool. Can be accompanied with standalone payrol solution, specifically to the location or relationship with contractors.

Pros

That is scalable corporate grade solution. Different providers of digital signature are supported. Stable work of application combined with reliable data storage. No errors experienced. Awesome dashboards and tools for performance rewiev and capabilities for continuous performance tracking since of sourcing, offer digital sign, onboarding and KPI tracking to hardware and policy documents assignments.

Cons

No solution for work force sourcing. That limits us for using it for construction industry and we are missing for access to contractors data bases. Above the average pricing. Time tracking needs attendance controls automation. Applicant resume parsing needs browser capabilities to be switched on. Good to have unified CV profile applicable to different ATS. Hard to migrate from previous ATS to Lever and needs specific mapping. Can have limits for using in offshore locations.

Review Source

MP

Michal P.  
Software Engineer  
Accounting  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "lever review"

March 25, 2025

5.0

My experience is from the interviewer perspective. the app does little more then display a resume and allow for feed back notes.

Pros

Lever is pretty straightforward to use. Its function is to display the resume of candidates for a job offer

Cons

The program in our usecase does very little from my view point. It would be easier if there was one application that would just do what the 10 individual ones do in the hiring process.

Review Source

sJ

shubha J.  
Head - Talent Acquisition  
Hospital & Health Care  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Easy and Efficient Tool"

February 14, 2025

4.0

Very happy with the product and all the support received. Structured implementation plan. It was a pleasure working with Tom Marino.

Pros

Ease of Use and implementation. The help videos were very useful. Good UI

Cons

Some limitations in customization - final rating scale in feedback form. Salary structure in offer process is not easy to create. Had issues integrating with Linkedin . Limited time for implementation calls

Alternatives considered

[Ashby](https://www.capterra.com/p/10004338/Ashby/)[Rippling](https://www.capterra.com/p/172127/Rippling/)

Reason for choosing Lever

Efficient , ease of use. UI. cost ,etc..

Review Source

JJ

James J.  
Operations  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Great tool, but not perfect. "

December 27, 2024

4.0

Used as primary ATS for 2 years, and had a few complaints that couldn't be resolved. Although it did the trick generally, we ended up moving away.

Pros

Easy to use and generally intuitive. Functionality was well thought out.

Cons

Sometimes lacked the necessary functionality and integrations necessary to make it 100% effective.

Review Source

LV

Ludovica V.  
HR Business Partner for italy and internation business  
Entertainment  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Great privacy and data compliance. to be reviewed unified pipeline concept, it is very uneuseful when you hire different roles in different countries"

November 5, 2024

4.0

Pros

What we appreciated most about Lever is its flexibility in data and privacy management, adapting well to the specific requirements of different countries.

Cons

However, the unified pipeline presents challenges, as it forces us to include certain steps only relevant in specific regions. This setup requires HR to manually manage candidate movement through each stage, as delegating this to hiring managers could lead to confusion with steps unique to certain countries, potentially complicating the hiring process.

Alternatives considered

[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

privacy compliance in europe and possibility to differenciate data and privacy workflow between italy and usa

Review Source

MD

Marya D.  
Director  
Education Management  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Pulling the Lever "

March 11, 2024

5.0

I highly recommend Lever ATS to any company serious about optimizing their recruitment strategy.

Pros

Moving from a manual Google process to Lever's intuitive interface, which makes navigating through the platform effortless. Its user-friendly interface, powerful features, and excellent customer support make it an indispensable tool for any organization looking to streamline their hiring process.

Cons

Our implementation specialist, \[sensitive content hidden\], was pleasant and helpful along the way in the implementation process which is a bit daunting but the results are well worth the initial set up time.

Alternatives considered

[BambooHR](https://www.capterra.com/p/110968/BambooHR/)[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Lead, Talent Acquisition  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Great ATS for the value and does it's job with reporting/sourcing and candidate management "

August 2, 2023

5.0

Pros

I think the ease of use is great with Lever, able to have hiring manager review / move candidates along while using the reporting aspect of it to showcase your work.Also the integration part is great as it can integrate with various platform like Hired.com, HireEZ, and of course GEM for sourcing.

Cons

Not much except there's too much updates or info coming from Lever. I wish they could lower their noise with updates and notification.

Alternatives considered

[JazzHR](https://www.capterra.com/p/87750/JazzHR/)[Workable](https://www.capterra.com/p/130175/Workable/)[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

pricing, ease of use and integration option with linkedin for example.

Review Source

HL

Heather L.  
Project Manager  
Telecommunications  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Data driven and dedicated "

February 28, 2018

4.0

Pros

We have used Lever for over 2 years, rolled out in countries across and globe and trained hundreds of hiring managers to use the system for feedback and reviewing applications. We initially chose Lever for its data and analytics, which have allowed us to automate reports and KPIs for teams in all our markets. The system is user friendly, and tools like Lever Nurture and Recommendations can help recruitment teams to find and attract more talent. Perhaps the best thing about choosing Lever is the team behind it. The system itself has rolled out many new features (requisitions, approval flows, restricting access to view sensitive information) after carefully considering feedback and suggestions, which are critical for scaling and management for large orgs. The support team is incredibly responsive to any issue and the product team is open to feedback and as transparent as possible about upcoming changes. The customer success team really goes above and beyond to understand and work through client concerns and helps to find innovative solutions to most issues. If you choose Lever and are lucky enough to work with rep - you've struck gold. I don't think I've worked with someone more focused on client satisfaction, able to make tough discussions enjoyable, and who really advocates for his clients.

Cons

While Lever is growing rapidly and adopting more large global clients, there still seems to be a dominance of focus on US tech startups - for example in the Partner Integrations or in offer templates (multiple options for equity and vesting options) but complex package structures can require significant customisations, which can require additional work for enterprise clients. The biggest hurdle to adopting Lever as a global enterprise solution has been concerns around data privacy of candidates and employees as it stores all data only on servers in the US. From a security standpoint, this is worrying, has made it harder to get buy in to roll out in other markets, and delayed several implementations. If you want to consider candidates outside the US, particularly in Europe and Emerging markets, it means significantly more time and checks with Legal, Compliance, and Security departments. There is also the fair concern that non US candidates may be discouraged from sharing their data if wary of surveillance and privacy rights - which are major concerns and considerations in other markets. Investing in data centres in locations that focus on protecting data privacy would make it easier (and safer) to roll out and use as a true enterprise tool.

Review Source

RR

Ryan R.  
Head of Talent  
Financial Services  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Lever is a Great ATS for Any Start-up! "

July 12, 2022

4.0

Over the last 9 years I've used Lever, Greenhouse, Workable, Taleo, Breezy, and Jobvite. Lever is hands-down my number 1 pick for its ease of use, its user interface, countless integrations, and efficient workflow. Lever has also been improving their reporting and analytics making their software a perfect fit for any start-up from a 10 person pre-series A to a 400 person series D/E company.

Pros

Lever was easy to implement (I had it up and running in less than 24 hours), the career page can be integrated with your current website quickly, the scorecards are fully customizable, and the ATS does a nice job at tracking candidates throughout the process.

Cons

At the moment, a user cannot edit the interview stages without submitting a ticket to Lever. I hope they change this in the near future.

Alternatives considered

[Workable](https://www.capterra.com/p/130175/Workable/)[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

User interface, scheduling workflow, reporting and analytics, integrations, and ease of use for my hiring managers.

Review Source

CL

Chengeer L.  
Senior Talent Acquisition Partner  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Does the job on the budget. If you have $ go with a more expensive one. "

March 11, 2023

4.0

Overall 4/5. There are things that I would change but as I said it does the job. At the end of the day, it is all a question of your usage, your team, the scale of the business, and ofc your budget. Lever is a great solution if you have a small team under 10 recruiters, company size under 1k, and a small budget to operate with. If you know how to run scrappy and get things done, Lever is a solid choice.

Pros

Simple.Intuitive. Extremely easy to onboard new recruiters and get them up to speed. All the basic functionality to run a quick process is there. Not expensive - for the price point I would say delivers a lot of value.

Cons

Not innovative. They accept feedback - but nothing gets implemented. Even simple things that should take no time. I wish they were listening to the customers who are using the product every day - we want to help and make Lever better.

Alternatives considered

[Bullhorn](https://www.capterra.com/p/140531/Bullhorn-Recruiting-Software/)[Ashby](https://www.capterra.com/p/10004338/Ashby/)[BambooHR](https://www.capterra.com/p/110968/BambooHR/)[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

I am not the decision-maker for the implementation. When I joined the team - Lever was already there.

Review Source

AG

Ashley G.  
People Operations Coordinator  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Vast improvement in the automation of our young, growing tech company's hiring process"

May 1, 2017

5.0

Pros

I love its seamless integration with the tools we most use--Gmail, Google Calendar, Slack, Abacus, and Docusign. It has made our entire hiring process more seamless as a result. For applicants, it provides a more professional, personalized (if templated!) experience than what our young company had previously afforded. For our People Operations department (of one) it has vastly improved our organization of resumes. Previously, I received from multiple sources (hand-delivered resumes, forwarded emails of resumes, dozens of job boards) often receiving resumes from people who were not directly involved with the hiring process. Lever has helped keep the channels of communication open between varying levels of involvement, equipping team members to track at the distance that makes the most sense for them. Furthermore, it has renewed energy throughout the company regarding our democratic hiring process. It is helpful that all team members can refer candidates more easily to the wider team, and that they can see all of their feedback forms/interviews in once place. The Slack reminders regarding feedback prove helpful since so much of our work is carried out via Slack. I also very much enjoyed the implementation process with Phil. He made clear that there is no dumb question. He was consistently friendly, and empathetic when there were obstacles in the implementation. He had a great way of allowing me to train by doing instead of training by sight.

Cons

I look forward to the tool having more options in terms of auto-text/mail-merge. For example, it would be great if email templates had some options for dates and times. I also wish that it were possible to add multiple locations to a particular posting. I created a location called "Multiple Locations," but it'd be nice to have more specific cities listed. Perhaps I'm missing something though and this is an option. I'm still very young in my use of this tool. I also wish that the workflow process could be manipulated by super admins. If ever we need to make an edit to the workflows, we will need to contact Lever's support team. I have no doubt they will be responsive. I simply wish we were empowered to customize this ourselves as needs change. It'd be great if each department could customize their own flow for their different hiring processes. Also, the cost was nearly prohibitive for our small company. I was glad that the team worked with us on this. I trust that if we can expand its use across departments (instead of the initially approved Client Success team), the company will see its full value. Right now it's a bit costly for our 1-person People Ops 'team' in its primary focus on Client Success hires. I think to get full use out of this platform, we would need a full-time recruiter--possibly using the Teamable and LinkedIn Recruiter integrations that Lever affords.

Review Source

Sara Y.  
Operations Associate  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "The most cost-effective for nonprofit organizations"

January 28, 2022

5.0

In short, I really enjoy Lever and all that it has to offer. While it contain a plain applicant tracking system and the HR functions are basic---it does what it needs to, is cost-effective, and that's why it's ideal for small businesses.

Pros

I love that Lever offers our nonprofit organization a whole lot of recruiting and tracking opportunities without breaking our operational budget. Specifically, I like that we can add and remove teammates with ease to track specific job postings and view where the applicants are within the process. The templates for individual job creation are a huge time saver as well since we never have to reinvent the wheel each time a new position opens up.

Cons

Unfortunately, Lever can be a bit confusing for new folks. I dislike that you have to toggle between tabs in order to get the whole picture (number of applicants & resumes per job opening) and analyzing the talent pipeline with Lever's self-generated information can be unreliable when compared to self-reporting methods.

Review Source

JS

Jake S.  
Talent Acquisition Associate  
Primary/Secondary Education  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Intuitive, Effective, Innovative."

December 30, 2017

4.0

Bottom line: In my opinion, Lever is the best ATS out there. Beats its competitors by at least a mile. Keep up the great work!

Pros

\- Scheduling interviews have never been easier for our Talent Team. Our conference rooms are linked to Lever so we can do everything without checking Google Calendar! - Easy to use interface. Every tab, page, and profile is very user-friendly, with the recruiter/hiring manager in mind. - Sending candidates a link to schedule their phone interview cuts down on the back and forth. - Communication between approvers, hiring managers and interviewing team is ridiculously easy that even my mom can use Lever. - Automatic job posting to external job boards. Super easy to use for niche job boards as well! - The referral system is super easy for folks who don't use Lever on a daily basis. - Customizable application per posting. SUPER easy. I love this feature. - Reports are very easy to pull and read. - Recruiters have control over who they involve in the hiring process. Before when we didn't have Lever, all hiring managers had access to every single job posting and its applicants in front of them. Now, we assign them to specific jobs they own. They can't see anything else. - Lever Extension on Chrome is insane, in a very good way. Extremely helpful when you're sourcing candidates on LinkedIn! - Andrew is great. Always there when we had questions and always willing to hop on a call with us. - Implementation phase was super quick and simple. The Lever team did whatever we asked and in turn, we did whatever they asked.

Cons

\- Requisition approval needs fine tuning. When we decide to hire internally for a requisition that has already been approved, we have to delete the current req and add another one indicating it was an internal hire in order for us to report on the number of internal hires. There's very little you can do with a req once it's been approved without getting the approvers involved again. - Offer approval is backward, in my opinion. The letter should be drafted first, then sent out to the approvers for their review. Right now, it's approval first, then offer letter draft. - Referrals are counted as "applicants" and not "leads." That's crazy to me. - Once a lead has applied through our careers website, we have to manually move them from the lead bucket to the applicant bucket. There's no automatic transfer. No notification, either.

Review Source

SG

Sydney G.  
Senior Director, Global Talent Acquisition  
Biotechnology  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Easy to configure ATS that provides a great candidate, recruiter, and hiring manager experience"

March 17, 2023

5.0

Pros

User interface is very intuitive and makes it easy to navigate. As a super admin, it's been very easy to configure/change/edit the settings in all facets. The global aspects of the company are very important from a data protection perspective along with the integration APIs. If you are a data person, you will love the visual insights as well. You can slice the data any way you need to and share automated reports on a cadence you define. The integration team was also incredible....they go above and beyond to figure out any roadblocks with integration and/or process specific needs that Lever doesn't readily support.

Cons

We are very strict with our security settings related to email and can't enable the approval processes just yet which is disappointing. Not Lever's fault, just the nature of our business setup. It has many features, but it could use a few more visual indicators in the candidate pipeline stages when multiple people are adding notes or giving a "thumbs up or down" while reviewing to make it easier to see if action has been taken on a candidate. It would also be nice to have sorting capabilities in the pipeline stages as well.

Alternatives considered

[JazzHR](https://www.capterra.com/p/87750/JazzHR/)[Workable](https://www.capterra.com/p/130175/Workable/)[Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.com/p/133100/Greenhouse/)

Reason for choosing Lever

Contract terms, cost, customer service, configurability, ease of use

Switched from

[Dayforce HCM](https://www.capterra.com/p/205376/Dayforce-HCM/)

We were using the recruiting module in ceridian and it was clunky, not very efficient, and didn't allow good workflow/visual insights.

Review Source

Similar Products

Featured

## Send me user reviews about this product

### Fill out the form and we'll send a list of the top-rated software based on real user reviews directly to your inbox.