# ReqView Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra > Is ReqView the right Requirements Management solution for you? Explore 49 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice. Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/145388/ReqView/reviews --- ReqView 4.6 (49) [View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/145388/ReqView/alternatives/) Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) * * * Last updated March 13th, 2026 # Reviews of ReqView Ease of use 4.4 Customer Service 4.9 ## Pros and Cons in Reviews ES Enrique S Electronics EngineerInformation Technology and Services, 1,001 - 5,000 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “For example, the templates customization fits perfectly our needs for the project.“ October 10, 2025 Geoffrey C Senior Systems EngineerAviation & Aerospace, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “HTML coding (not my strong suit!) for templates, inability to 'undo', inflexibility with some aspects of the ISO templates (like renaming documents), linking can be a bit clunky until you get used to it, Indenting (and out-denting if thats a word) while keeping the structure can be tricky, Numbering and dotpointing in some fields can also be tricky,“ March 7, 2024 NR Nazar R System EngineerAirlines/Aviation, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “Very fast responses from the support team with actual helpful advices.“ March 5, 2026 KN Krzysztof N Systems EngineerAviation & Aerospace, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “The customization is limited due to the use of not that intuitive handlebars.“ October 6, 2021 TP Tolgahan P Senior Software EngineerAviation & Aerospace, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: 6-12 months. “Customer support is stellar, they are very responsive, friendly and do their best to find solutions for reported issues.“ August 7, 2025 BF Bryce F Principal Systems EngineerHospital & Health Care, 1,001 - 5,000 employeesUsed the software for: I used a free trial. “This is not as straightforward even with the provided documentation on ReqIF imports.“ April 13, 2022 SD Steven D Support ManagerMining & Metals, 5,001 - 10,000 employeesUsed the software for: 6-12 months. “The product shines in its simplicity, yet it covers most of our needs and gets the job done so far.“ March 12, 2025 ## Showing most helpful reviews Showing 1-25 of 49 Reviews Sort by: Most Helpful Rating Company Size Reviewer's Role Length of Use Frequency of Use Benjamin B. System Engineer or Project Manager Design Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Try ReqView!" August 25, 2025 5.0 It has been good. They are responsive to requests, add features we ask for overtime, and it helps us collaborate. It will only get better I think. I would recommend to any small to medium org that needs a simple tracing/req/risk management systems. Massively better than Excel or other handcrafted systems. Pros Helpful to organize reqs, risks and other stuff. Straightforward setup and customizable. Good options. Great for smaller organizations that can't afford a huge IT overhead and maintenance for more complex products. Cons Minimal free access for other users. Main issue is commenting. Need to be able to have a large number of users have access to leave comments. This would be really helpful. Also - simultaneous access for comments (at least leaving their own, not deleting or responding). Other small issues - slow loading and unlocking, could be easier to copy paste cells into other rows/requirements (especially tracing links). Alternatives considered [Microsoft Excel](https://www.capterra.com/p/176574/Excel/) Reason for choosing ReqView A variety of products and things. Greenlight Guru, other products, I don't exactly remember anymore. Switched from [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.capterra.com/p/148577/MasterControl/) Better and easier tracing. Easier collaboration and templating. Review Source TP Tolgahan P. Senior Software Engineer Aviation & Aerospace Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Lightweight and Capable Requirements Tool" August 7, 2025 5.0 We are using ReqView as a replacement to Doors Classic. While it is not (yet) a drop in replacement due to some missing functionality, ReqView was flexible enough to let us integrate it into our workflow. Customer support is stellar, they are very responsive, friendly and do their best to find solutions for reported issues. Dev team also seem very capable solving reported issues in a timely manner. Pros ReqView is very lightweight and fast to use. UI feels modern and fresh and very intuitive. Recently added scaling options make reading on high DPI screens very comfortable. Cons No out-of box solution for traceability link coherence/baselining if the linked documents are split into multiple git repositories. Switched from [IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS](https://www.capterra.com/p/238454/IBM-Engineering-Requirements-Management-DOORS-Next/) ReqView has native Linux Support. It is much faster than Doors Classic. Additionally ReqView Pricing is fair. Review Source AS Albert S. RAMS engineer Railroad Manufacture Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Review by Albert" November 4, 2022 3.0 Pros The capability to make traceability between documents and projects in a very efficient way. Cons The most critical of the SW to me is the 'CNTRl+Z' command does not exist. Review Source Response from Eccam November 29, 2022 Hi Albert, Thank you for your feedback. We are considering the development of an advanced undo feature that will be compatible with the real-time collaboration solution. NR Nazar R. System Engineer Airlines/Aviation Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Good value for money with great support but still some work to be done on the tool" March 5, 2026 4.0 Pros Very fast responses from the support team with actual helpful advices. The software is very custom and anyone can tailor it to their needs instead of trying to fit in into the existing framework. Clear roadmap of features to be introduced, the product is constantly improving. It is a good value for money, though. Cons There are some features for collaboration that are missing, which prevent us from multiple people using the tool at its maximum capacity Review Source Response from Eccam March 19, 2026 Hi Nazar, Thanks for the great review! We’re glad our support and customization are hitting the mark for your team. We also really value our collaboration with you regarding the upcoming Git Branch and Merge functionality. Your feedback is instrumental in shaping these collaboration features. ReqView Team AB Alexandre B. Verification and Validation Aviation & Aerospace Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Loaded with features for a very reasonable price" December 12, 2024 5.0 User since 2020 something. Worked in the past with IBM/Jama/R4J (...) and I have to hard time finding out what ReqView is missing compared to those tools, given my experience is mainly in stringent domains (Aero/military). Pros The company enhance the product based on user's feedback and needs. The tool is lightweight, no brainer to deploy and maintain. Easy integration with Jira or other tools. The support I received was excellent. Different flexible types of licensing. Affordable. Round trip update from Jira! Possible to work with distributed teams/tiers (document exchange). Cons Indentation when moving requirements across section could be difficult, but with practice it is easier. Alternatives considered [Jama Connect](https://www.capterra.com/p/80432/Jama/)[Easy8](https://www.capterra.com/p/136070/Easy8/)[IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS](https://www.capterra.com/p/238454/IBM-Engineering-Requirements-Management-DOORS-Next/)[easeRequirements for Jira](https://www.capterra.com/p/164178/Requirements-Management-for-JIRA-R4J/) Reason for choosing ReqView The big names are expensive. The open source ones are prone to disappear one day. Or not. Review Source Response from Eccam January 15, 2025 Thank you for your great feedback! We’re delighted to hear you value ReqView’s rich feature set, seamless Jira integration, and our responsive support. It’s rewarding to know that our focus on providing a powerful yet affordable solution meets your needs. Geoffrey C. Senior Systems Engineer Aviation & Aerospace Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "The requirements management tool to rule them all" March 7, 2024 5.0 ReqView has been a game changer for our small company. The ability to navigate, trace, and organise hundreds of requirements to create logical, traceable test plans has been essential to our business. ReqView lets us quickly, easily and, most importantly, robustly do what would have taken tens of spreadsheets to accomplish. The customer support has been second to none, making it such an easy tool to adopt, adapt and immediate add value to our daily workflow. Highly recommended for any business struggling with requirements management! Pros Easy to use, fully featured, Import/Export features, Multi-views, traceability, simple ontology, pre-built iso standard templates, awesome customer support, flexible customisable templates, linking with Neo4J, document organisation and structure, table views, logical file storage, easy transfer of files and collaboration using simple tools like Sharepoint, monolithic AND exploded file structures, export to reqif, standard files, copy and paste images directly, History, Instructions area, attachments, platform stability. Cons HTML coding (not my strong suit!) for templates, inability to 'undo', inflexibility with some aspects of the ISO templates (like renaming documents), linking can be a bit clunky until you get used to it, Indenting (and out-denting if thats a word) while keeping the structure can be tricky, Numbering and dotpointing in some fields can also be tricky, Review Source Response from Eccam March 20, 2024 Hi Geoffrey, We truly appreciate your feedback and are thrilled to hear that ReqView has been a game changer for your company. We're also delighted to have played a part in streamlining your requirements management process. VR Verified Reviewer Senior designer Design Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "A super effective tool for designers" August 30, 2021 4.0 As a company, we appreciate the look and feel of the ReqView software, that is very much accessible for people working in a creative technical environment. Installation and maintenance is simple and the cost is very reasonable. As responsible for the implementation I have received substantial support from the ReqView team. Quite some wishes have resulted in features in the software (linked object hoover-over preview f.e.). Needles to say that I feel taken serious by ReqViews development team and that I am grateful for this We are confident about its use in the future. Pros One of the main benefits of ReqView is that it focusses really on the content that I am interested in as a designer in a product development process. There is little administrative and procedural overhead (clutter) in the program as well as in the user interface. This enables to view/read information paragraphs-wise almost like in word processing software. Having all information linked is fantastic for traceability and relative new to us, solving a documentation issue that could not realistically be solved with simple Office SW like Excel, Word etc.. ReqView is so simple that my compete design team can manage it, which is a great benefit over alternatives. The learning curve is steep, but really short (excluding HTML-programming). A super feature is the export into Word or PDF resulting in a compact document in which all linkage is still functional! How happy would I be as a client receiving such project documentation! Fantastic! Besides, also digital signing now is an option, a future must have! Cons The HTML programming needed for custom reports is something that you need to master, but from that point it offers many nice options. The recent ReqView update includes a wizard helping in this, which enables to create simple reports in under 30 seconds. So actually part of this pain is eased. Procedural rules, the delegation of formal rights etc. is not part of the software. Though we benefit from this, I can imagine that stricter application (quality systems) could ask for such functionality. However, we don't miss that at the moment. Alternatives considered [Matrix Requirements](https://www.capterra.com/p/143557/Matrix-Requirements-Medical/) Reason for choosing ReqView ReqViews user interface is much (!) less complicated, and design data is not in the cloud but local. Also the helpful team made us choose for ReqView. Review Source Response from Eccam September 6, 2021 Thank you for the terrific review! It is nice to hear that you find ReqView excelling at simplicity and local data storage, comparing to alternative solutions. We are glad you like the new wizards and are looking forward to working together on the next ideas to make ReqView even better. Romuald G. Product Director Medical Devices Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Using Reqview to manage requirements of medical devices" March 4, 2021 5.0 On-line documentation covers a very broad panel of use and configuration topics. The documentation is very easy to read and understand and also very straightforward. The support via email or their support portal is very efficient and effective in solving our issues or helping with advanced topics. Pros We use Reqview to record specifications of our medical robotic devices, both for hardware requirements and software requirements, in the scope of the EN 62304, ISO 14971 and ISO 13485 standard of the medical device industry. We use Reqview to analyze risks and trace the mitigations up to specifications and test cases. We record and trace test cases specifications in Reqview using multiple document projects. Everything is stored as json files which allows us to store the source files in a GIT server. Reqview has very easy to use export features allowing us to export Reqview documents into EXCEL or DOCX files matching with our company formatting templates so they can be archived within the documentation folder of our medical devices for regulatory purposes. ReqView is a perfect tool to support and enforce our quality process. Cons When features are missing, we can ask the Reqview team and they show their roadmap and progress done with features we are interested in. We can vote for upcoming features as well. Switched from [IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere](https://www.capterra.com/p/174710/IBM-Rational/) IBM Rational RequisiteWeb was complex and heavy to use or configure, and with a poor online support. Review Source Response from Eccam March 5, 2021 Thank you for great feedback with more information about your regulatory compliance usecase! ES Enrique S. Electronics Engineer Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Excellent tool for requirements management" October 10, 2025 5.0 Very useful tool that I always recommend if I start a project with a need of requirements traceability documentation. The amount of features and configuration flexibility make very easy the adaptation to different kind of projects. Pros The amount of features and flexibility of the configuration. For example, the templates customization fits perfectly our needs for the project. The syncrhonization with external tools like Jira, Git or Enterprise Architect. Also the great customer support. Every time I had to ask something I received a very quick and complete answer. Also the development team usually offers workarounds that you may have not thought about and is also open to feature requests. Cons The learning curve. For people that never used the tool, it can be a little difficult and not very intuitive. But considering the amount of features it is understandable. Review Source Response from Eccam October 15, 2025 Enrique, thank you for your wonderful review! We’re delighted that the flexibility of our templates and the integrations with other tools have been so valuable to your projects. It’s great to hear that our support and development teams have been responsive and helpful. We truly appreciate your trust and recommendation! ReqView Team MG Martin G. CTO Airlines/Aviation Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Straightforward requirements management system" October 7, 2025 4.0 Good. It has flexible templating for output, but is cumbersome for editing. We tend to keep documents in word, external to reqview until the document is well developed and not subject to much change. We then import the word format into reqview and add linkages etc. Pros Simple, straightforward. Import from Word. Output to Word format. Flexible templating for output reports. Cons 1\. No Undo function. 2. Moving sections around by promotion of headings can lead to unintended changes to the document that cannot be simply undone. 3. Editing is slow and a bit laborious (especially compared to desktop editors). Could you add a better find/replace function? Review Source HH Hans H. Team lead electrical systems Aviation & Aerospace Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Lightweight, but very powerful software" September 7, 2022 5.0 Very responsive and supporting. Not only have they been very helpful with our questions, they also implemented some features to allow us to work the way we like to (instead of the tool limiting us). That level of support is very much appreciated. What we also like is that the roadmap for features is listed on the website for all to see. Very transparent. Pros Very user friendly and easy to use. It is like using DOORS as it should have been designed :-) Cons ReqView works on a file basis and separated projects. I would love to see a database version one day. Opening in projects in SVN could, in my perspective, be simplified. This is a minor issue. In time we could use some administrator limited functionality. Reason for choosing ReqView The other tools are all very expensive and complex. We needed something basic and lightweight. And honestly ReqView gives the biggest bang-for-your-buck. Review Source Response from Eccam September 9, 2022 Hello Hans, thank you for awesome review! We really enjoy working with your team! Raül G. Director de arte Design Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Review ReqView" December 15, 2022 5.0 Notable Pros El producto es bastante fácil de usar y si tienes una base de ello puedes hacer muchas cosas Cons Como he comentado antes si no tienes una previa de conocimiento puedes marearte en el proceso Review Source DS Dan S. Embedded Developer Oil & Energy Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Initial impressions of a new ReqView user." July 21, 2021 5.0 Pros All I really wanted to do was get on with the task of defining my project requirements, and the thought of facing a steep learning curve, on any new requirements suite, was not something I wanted to go through. However, ReqView presented me with no such 'learning curve' hurdle, and as soon as it was installed I found I could get on with defining my project requirements knowing that the formatting of the 'deliverable' document could be refined later on in the process. This is exactly the sort of requirements platform I was looking for... and ReqView delivered it to me. Cons The general editing of tables could perhaps be enhanced. I found that the look and layout of them within the ReqView environment could be improved, and some of the editing features did not work exactly as intended. For example there is a confirmed bug associated with the table popup in the editor dialog, where the popup buttons or dropdowns don't work sometimes, such as when trying to edit rows. However the ReqView support team did provide a workaround which allowed me to get my editing done. Review Source Response from Eccam July 25, 2021 Thank you for feedback. We are happy that you appreciate how easy you started with ReqView. Thank you also for reporting usability issues of embedded tables. We are working on a fix and will introduce it in an upcoming release. EB Emily B. Product Manager Information Technology and Services Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Love this product" January 18, 2021 5.0 I am running a year-long product build with multiple integrations, UI work, backend work, all driven by a number of compliance requirements. I needed something that can handle cross-references (where most product management software is more checklist-based) and generate multiple types of documents on demand. Reqview allows me to create a single source for data that would normally be spread over multiple Word & Excel documents, and cross-reference between them. This is a fantastic tool for managing complex projects. Pros I spend more time on the data, not the formatting. Reqview handles the numbering, formatting, and technical requirements of creating EDD's and external docs, so I can focus on content. I can track multiple data types (files, images, lists) elegantly. I can add custom attributes to my data to customize it. Cons The software can feel a little intimidating at first glance, but they supply tutorials & documentation. Review Source GW Guenther W. E/E Engineer Automotive Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "This lightweight RM tool is a great solution for small development departments" September 1, 2021 5.0 Pros Very easy installation, steep learning curve, great support, clear user interface without gimmicks. Made for technicians! Cons Customizing document properties or creating custom report templates requires basic coding skills. This disadvantage is compensated by the great support. The roadmap reveals that hard work is being done to further improve the convenience. Review Source Response from Eccam September 6, 2021 Thank you for nice review! Please check the new traceability wizard, it will help you to generate an end-to-end traceability report for impact analysis in just a few clicks. Another new wizard for easy customization of document properties is on the way. KN Krzysztof N. Systems Engineer Aviation & Aerospace Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Nice requirements management tool" October 6, 2021 5.0 Very good low cost tool. Sufficient for requirements and verification management for most of small and average companies. Ideal for the first step in transformation to Model-based systems engineering Pros Clear and intuitive GUI. Good export options. Cons The customization is limited due to the use of not that intuitive handlebars. Review Source JM Jose M. HW engineer Defense & Space Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Improves in ReqView" September 21, 2022 4.0 The experience using Requview is very pleasant as the user interface is easy to understand and use. Pros What I like the most is how easy and intuitive it is to use. Cons Working in a group is complicated since several people cannot work editing the same document. Review Source Response from Eccam September 26, 2022 Hello José, Thank you for your fantastic review. We are pleased that you find ReqView intuitive and that you would recommend it to other users. JI Jordi I. SW eniginner Automotive Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Very satisfied." July 23, 2025 5.0 I’m extremely satisfied with both the software and the customer support provided by ReqView. The tool is intuitive, reliable, and has significantly improved our requirements management workflow. It offers all the features we need in a clean, user-friendly interface. What really stands out is the customer attention—we always receive prompt, professional, and helpful responses. It’s clear that the team behind ReqView is committed to delivering a high-quality product and excellent support. Highly recommended! Pros Usability, configurability and customer service. - Cons Edition of fields. - Review Source Response from Eccam August 4, 2025 Thank you for your detailed and thoughtful review! We're happy to hear that ReqView’s usability, configurability, and customer service have met your needs, and that it’s had a positive impact on your workflow. We're especially glad you noticed the commitment of our team—it's something we truly value. Your recommendation means a lot to us! SD Steven D. Support Manager Mining & Metals Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Lightweight but strong tool for requirements management" March 12, 2025 4.0 The product shines in its simplicity, yet it covers most of our needs and gets the job done so far. Pros Very convenient tool, allowing quick organising of requirements. Good customer support Some useful features: custom attributes, custom PDF/Word rendering, filters, rich text, GIT integration Cons Filtering with AND/OR clauses can be a bit cumbersome Review Source Response from Eccam March 20, 2025 Steven, thank you for your review! We're thrilled to hear that ReqView’s easy-to-use interface, useful features, and Git integration are helping you effectively manage requirements. We truly appreciate your feedback and are glad our customer support has been helpful. AB Aaron B. Systems Engineer Management Consulting Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Simple to use and effection" July 24, 2024 5.0 Pros Good support and communication with techs Cons Would like some integrated dash boarding Reason for choosing ReqView Price and functionality factors - plus good support Switched from [IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS](https://www.capterra.com/p/238454/IBM-Engineering-Requirements-Management-DOORS-Next/) Company choice - looking for inexpensive option for smaller sized company Review Source Response from Eccam August 13, 2024 Hello Aaron, Thank you for your review! We’re glad to hear that you find ReqView simple to use and appreciate our support. BO Bjorn O. CEO Medical Devices Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Reqview for large-scale medical device development" October 22, 2022 4.0 The overall experience is very good. It solves what it does very well, and has a very good focus. Pros It allows implementation across a large team. Its very easy to use and allows for collaboration over SVN. The floating license solution makes deployment pain-free. Syncronization to JIRA (and onwards to Enterprise Architect) is critical for us to allow full traceability from user needs, through requirements, specifications and (via JIRA) into implementation and test management. ReqView is also extremely stable and we have used it for projects spanning several years with no data loss or problems. Cons For very large projects with very many documents it can get hard to get the overview (a folder structure would be good). It would also be good to have notifications (ie when logging into the tool) if another user has left a comment for you (tagged a user in a comment) Reason for choosing ReqView The other products are either extremely poor (such as JIRA plugins, or cheao online tools), or they are major platforms that can do "everything". ReqView is great for requirement management, traceability, document export and collaboration. That is what I need. Review Source Response from Eccam November 29, 2022 Hi Bjorn, Thank you for the excellent review. We appreciate your positive feedback and your ideas for further development. We are delighted to see that ReqView helps you with your large-scale project and you would recommend it to others. MF Marco F. Systems Engineer Defense & Space Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Probably the best user friendly alternative to IBM Doors (especially for small project)" December 22, 2023 5.0 I work for an Aerospace&Defence company. We're starting adopting ReqView (with some Pilot Projects) and the feedback is absolutely positive. I would recommend this tool to anybody looking for an easy but powerful tool for requirements management. I've used IBM Doors for years in my previous Company and the first impact was like coming back home, everythink looks familiar but less complex and far more accessible. Template creation for customizing your exported documents is tricky at the beginning, but once you master it you've endless opportunities. Nevertheless, the Wiki is complete and Customer Support is excellent. Absolutely recommended! Pros \- Ease of use - Possibility to create documents according to desired template - Easy to deploy - Fast and light - Requirements Traceability easily achieved Cons \- Document Versioning (baselining) could be improved - Please add Find and Replace and CTRL+Z! Review Source Response from Eccam December 27, 2023 Dear Marco, Thank you for your positive review! We're thrilled to serve as your user-friendly alternative to IBM Doors. We're actively working on improving the document versioning feature and integrating Git. Enhancing Find & Replace is also considered in our Roadmap. Additionally, we plan to release the undo feature along with the real-time collaboration approach we want to implement. BF Bryce F. Principal Systems Engineer Hospital & Health Care Used the software for: I used a free trial ### "Great Value for feature-rich requirements management tool - Phenomenal customer support" April 13, 2022 5.0 This tool is awesome. Small footprint, Feature-rich, scalable, and easy to use! Definitely recommend for the value. Pros I liked the ease of use and the ease of integration and deployment: Use: 1. The scale was familiar enough from other tools to get running quickly. Secondly, the documentation, and adaptability for scaling, quickly aided in meeting more needs. 3. Customer support was timely and punctual in all the engagements, from licensing to questions on features, to clarifications. Deployment: 1. The native tools and web applications make this so easily scalable. 2. There was no dependency of a third party service or cloud was extremely helpful. (like having to maintain a server side cloud with IT and all that comes with it) 3. The storage structure of json files enable great configuration management through various means like SVN or git! Cons Having various "views" of each document within a project would be wonderful - i.e a b-directional trace view for analysis, vs. a publication & authoring view to only provide what is needed for a document/template. Integration with Azure DevOps (ADO) would be nice, however there are current workarounds with CSV imports/exports. I also want to be able to utilize a bit more integration with other MBSE tools, such as Capella. This is not as straightforward even with the provided documentation on ReqIF imports. Reason for choosing ReqView 1\. Deployment strategy. 2. Documentation & Support. 3. Value. Review Source Response from Eccam April 25, 2022 Hi Bryce, Thank you for your awesome review! We plan to introduce "role-based views" soon. TL Tom L. Systems Engineering Manager Printing Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "ReqView Greatly Improves Our Processes" January 18, 2024 5.0 Pros ReqView is a user-friendly, lightweight requirements management tool requiring minimal overhead and administration. My team quickly adopted it, finding it highly effective for document creation, requirements management, status tracking, and traceability. We use it for various requirements and validation documentation, receiving positive feedback for its versatility in information access—either directly in ReqView or through exported PDFs—and its customizable attributes to suit our specific needs. Cons We use a network folder repository for our documentation, requiring simultaneous multi-user access to documents and projects. However, ReqView lacks effective alerts and controls for multiple users accessing the same document simultaneously, leading to coordination issues. Review Source Response from Eccam January 22, 2024 Hello Tom, Thank you for your excellent review and valuable feedback! We're pleased to hear that ReqView has greatly improved your processes. We appreciate your insights on the need for real-time collaboration, and we want you to know that it's already on our road map for future enhancements. aB andrea B. product manager Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Perfect tool for requirement management" September 21, 2022 5.0 In my previous job I used DOORs as requirement management tool, ReqView is giving me the same experience of it but at reasonable price! It is easy to use and to install and it helps me on managing requirements, SRS and test cases document with a new project with an external company. Pros It is impressive the easiness and efficient way to build up links across requirements for traceability purpose. In addition, the tool is very easy to customize adding new attributes, new links! Very good importing capabilities from Reqif standard format which allow collaboration with main companies who are using DOORS for example. Support is also magnificent! Cons even if most of editing feature are quite good, editing is not at the same level of Word which is the standard de-facto. Sometime is difficult to manage table. Just another small glitch, while looking at the doc, column width is not sized accordingly to width of the table and this cause overlap on other columns next to each. Alternatives considered [IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS](https://www.capterra.com/p/238454/IBM-Engineering-Requirements-Management-DOORS-Next/) Reason for choosing ReqView price! facility to install it. Review Source Response from Eccam September 26, 2022 Hi Andrea, Thank you for the lovely review! We are glad that ReqView is a perfect fit for your needs. Similar Products Featured ## Related categories [Requirements Management](https://www.capterra.com/requirements-management-software/)[IT Management](https://www.capterra.com/it-management-software/) ## Send me user reviews about this product ### Fill out the form and we'll send a list of the top-rated software based on real user reviews directly to your inbox.