Capterra Logo
Helping businesses choose better software since 1999
Planisware Orchestra

Planisware Orchestra

4.2 (18)
Capterra offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

What is Planisware Orchestra?

Planisware Orchestra is a SaaS solution for project portfolio and resource management that brings you real-time visibility into team activities, resource availability, timesheets and project progress to maximize your project portfolio performance! Make Planisware Orchestra your single tool for resource management and capacity planning to balance your workload and fit your allocations process, whether you need role-based or named resources, complex assignment rules with supply and demand.

Planisware Orchestra Integrations

Jira logo
Jira
Microsoft Teams logo
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft SharePoint logo
Microsoft SharePoint
Tableau logo
Tableau
Microsoft Project logo
Microsoft Project
Digital transformation program overview with Gantt
Strategic portfolio budget resource overview
Project management project health
Digital transformation example project scenario planning
Project portfolio task board

Software like Planisware Orchestra

Based on other buyer's searches, these are the products that could be a good fit for you.

Celoxis

by Celoxis Technologies

4.4 (313)
Starting Price:$25/month

by Zoho

4.5 (727)
Starting Price:$5/month

by Atlassian

4.4 (14957)
Starting Price:$7.53/month

by monday.com

4.6 (5338)
Starting Price:$12/month
Asana

by Asana

4.5 (13225)
Starting Price:$8.5/month

How much is Planisware Orchestra?

Starting From:
$45 Per Month
Pricing Model: Per User
  • No free trial
  • No free version
Pricing Details (Provided by Vendor):
For pricing information, contact Planisware Orchestra directly.

Planisware Orchestra Features

What solutions does Planisware Orchestra provide?

Alternatives to Planisware Orchestra

Planisware Orchestra
Planisware Orchestra

Starting from:
$45/Per Month
Pricing Model:
Per User

Overall Rating:

Ease of Use
3.9
Customer Service
4.1
Features
4.1
Value for Money
4.0
Jira

Starting from:
$7.53/Per Month
Pricing Model:
Per User

Overall Rating:

Ease of Use
4.1
Customer Service
4.2
Features
4.4
Value for Money
4.3
Wrike

Starting from:
$10/Per Month
Pricing Model:
Per User

Overall Rating:

Ease of Use
4.1
Customer Service
4.3
Features
4.3
Value for Money
4.2
Zoho Projects

Starting from:
$5/Per Month
Pricing Model:
Per User

Overall Rating:

Ease of Use
4.2
Customer Service
4.3
Features
4.4
Value for Money
4.4

Planisware Orchestra Reviews

Showing 5 of 18 reviews
Overall
4.2
Ease of Use
3.9
Customer Service
4.1

Pros

  • Ease of implementation and great freedom of customization.

  • The ability to customize stages and gates is great as it allows for different types of projects in one organization or for different organizations to all have completely different set ups.

  • We really appreciate the activity Stream; it constitutes a really help in follow up. Since we have learned how to create and use the Dashboard module, we like it.

  • Good evolution of the tool with better and better user interface and features. Good interface with Google permits to us to use our Electronic Document Management System, SSO.

Cons

  • Limited integrations with other commonly used software.

  • The poor performance with Internet Explorer/Edge.

  • Poor documentation to become Orchestra expert and support daily usage. Heavy weakness on standard reporting.

  • No possiblity to do "batch" actions in lists. Timesheet workflow validation too restrictive.

Most Helpful Reviews for Planisware Orchestra

Verified Reviewer
Directeur Etudes et Développement produits
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad, 11-50 employees
Used the software for: 2+ years
Overall Rating
5.0
Ease of Use
4.0
Customer Service
4.0
Features
5.0
Value for Money
4.0
Likelihood to Recommend
8/10
Reviewer Source
Source: GetApp
July 1, 2017

"Great app !"

Pros: I particularly appreciate the integration of different features : project management, ressources management, budget, time tracking. We also implemented specific features apart from project development like non-conformity treatment, executive committee decisions management, customised reports

Cons: My company find it a bit expensive but it worth it. Needs a real training to get the full performance.

Antonio N.
Strategic Program Manager
Higher Education, 11-50 employees
Used the software for: 2+ years
Overall Rating
5.0
Ease of Use
5.0
Customer Service
5.0
Features
5.0
Value for Money
4.0
Likelihood to Recommend
9/10
Reviewer Source
Source: Capterra
July 25, 2022

"Orchestrating a plan"

Pros: It's a versatile tool with lots of options for customization. I can see large or small organizations getting great use from the functions, with a careful assessment of your individual needs. Lots of ways to visualize progress on projects. It also has paths for simplifying the user experience for different members of the team. What I/we perhaps like most about the software is the ability to not only plan the project, but assign resources (allocate) at different increments (hours, % of FTE, days) - and to have that information push automatically to the individual owners of those allocations for task management and time reporting.

Cons: UI still needs some sharpening (and I've seen the teams improve on this since we signed on). Limited integrations with other commonly used software.

Alternatives Considered: Jira and monday.com
Switched From: Meisterplan and Google Sheets
Reasons for Switching to Planisware Orchestra: Previous tools and approaches could look forward to build a project plan, and look backwards to report time, but could not look forward to align resource needs with the project plan. Our resource needs were often an educated guess at best.
Vincent C.
Project Portfolio Manager
Hospital & Health Care, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: 6-12 months
Overall Rating
3.0
Ease of Use
2.0
Customer Service
3.0
Features
3.0
Value for Money
2.0
Likelihood to Recommend
7/10
Reviewer Source
Source: Capterra
July 9, 2020

"NQI Orchestra Review"

Overall: We started with a new version of Orchestra : 7.0. This version wasn't mature and we faced many bugs. Ramp-up is not easy (Planning, budget and Ressources management). Owerall, this tool is good, there are good ideas and functions. Now, the next step should be to simplify the User interface. Some idea : include more batch actions, simplify Planning > Gantt (only one view), simplify Project Ressource Management by displaying ressources need more easyly >> too many clicks to display ressrouces need.

Pros: - Integration between projects and ressources - Customisation with the Designer - Possiblity to export lists

Cons: - "Clicodrome". Too many click to do something. No possiblity to do "batch" actions in lists. - Timesheet workflow validation too restrictive - In project Budget and project ressource management no possibility to express the ressource need by competencies. Only ressource type is available >> too restrictive as a ressource can have only one "type". Most of organisation have ressources that can do many activities in projets (Project management and business analysis for exemple). Assign ressources by type is too restrictive. Real need to asign ressources by competencies.

Vincent G.
PMO
Insurance, 10,001+ employees
Used the software for: 2+ years
Overall Rating
4.0
Ease of Use
4.0
Customer Service
5.0
Features
4.0
Value for Money
5.0
Likelihood to Recommend
8/10
Reviewer Source
Source: Capterra
August 31, 2020

"Simple efficient and scalable "

Overall: We stard with Planisware Orchestra in 2011. First to manage IT projects and then gradually to manage all IT activities. This tool has evolved a lot since 2011 and allows us today to manage the entire activity, workforces load and budgets forecasting.

Pros: Capapcity to manage large organizations and numerous resources. Easy to use without too many concessions on advanced features. Scalable solution both in terms of users and functionalities. Great local support (France). Suitable for RUN and BUILD activities. Numerous intégration possibilities (flat files, datamart, Reporting Tools, etc.)

Cons: Agility is not perfectly managed. Kaban could be smoother.

Alternatives Considered: Clarity and Microsoft Project
Reasons for Choosing Planisware Orchestra: Simplicity, Scalability, SaaS, Price
Thierry J.
management control
Research, 501-1,000 employees
Used the software for: 2+ years
Overall Rating
4.0
Ease of Use
5.0
Customer Service
4.0
Features
4.0
Value for Money
4.0
Likelihood to Recommend
9/10
Reviewer Source
Source: Capterra
July 13, 2017

"Very good tool, easily and intuitive to use on main functions."

Overall: The main benefits are in the simplicity of navigation and use for the end-users: very good design and organization of the activity with fast access to the interesting information for the different level of the organization.

Pros: Orchestra is tool very appreciated by the users. Its design is clear and intuitive, which allows the different users to navigate inside the tool after 1 hour of training. Its use is also sufficiently simple for the occasional users (1 time per month or less) to re-find the menu without a new reading of the user guide. The access is simple and efficient from a location. We use it to manage the R&D activity of several laboratories in the world with more than thousand users and several thousands of projects follow by the system. The simultaneous connection of several dozens of users induces no difficulty. Each one can make his job: his creation or updated of project information. This tool offers the possibility to add specific modules require by additional needs. Support team is rather efficient and provides a good assistance for small difficulty or misunderstanding. Nevertheless, the new developments require very accurate specifications from the final user in order to reach quickly the new functions.

Cons: There are no clear dark points about this software. Some specific attentions must be brought to the recording time (storage of the data) for specific functions. This time can increases with the number of manipulated elements or for specific functions. It is not a real issue, except in the case of long set of data recording.