--- title: "Responsive Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra" description: "Is Responsive the right RFP solution for you? Explore 190 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice." source_url: "https://bx-capterra-jskei0oik-g2dm.vercel.app/p/148054/Responsive/reviews/" page_type: "reviews" language: "en" --- Responsive 4.5 (190) [View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/148054/Responsive/alternatives/) Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) * * * Last updated July 21st, 2026 # Reviews of Responsive Ease of use 4.4 Customer Service 4.6 ## Pros and Cons in Reviews SF Stephanie F ManagementResearch, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “It also enables a “build once, use many” approach, allowing us to update shared or redundant sections in one place rather than across multiple templates. While we are still working on standardizing and organizing our templates to fully realize this capability, the long‑term efficiency and governance benefits are significant.“ April 29, 2026 SA Sofía A Proposal WriterInformation Technology and Services, 1,001 - 5,000 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “When I'm answering an RFX inside the Answering Page section, I wish I could Control + F my way through the app so that I could go back to previously mentioned answers and copy paste them into new questions because sometimes RFXs are repetitive.“ May 20, 2026 Hector T Sr. Director Presales CoEComputer Software, 201 - 500 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “Responsive makes this easier by providing a central repository for all RFP responses and enabling collaboration among team members, which improves productivity by allowing people from different teams to work on proposals in parallel.“ March 27, 2026 AM Ana M Business ConsultantHuman Resources, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “One thing i Really miss in responsive is a notes space for each project where we could write shared considerations about each project.“ March 19, 2026 SF Stephanie F ManagementResearch, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “That said, its primary strength lies in its ability to restrict update access and centrally manage templates, which provides stronger control and governance than our current approach.“ April 29, 2026 CF Christian F Proposal WriterHospital & Health Care, 1,001 - 5,000 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “For example, I want comments, activity, recommendations next to each other as my most used but it's annoying when they are far apart and require multiple clicks to go back and forth between them.“ March 24, 2026 AC Anjali C Client Diligence SpecialistFinancial Services, 5,001 - 10,000 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “The platform stands out for its clear structure and organization—each product is categorized neatly, and every section has a designated owner, which makes it easy to know exactly who to reach out to within different business units.“ March 27, 2026 JB Justin B Lead Undedrwriting AnalystPharmaceuticals, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “There are sometimes issues with the responses that are automatically pulled in where a question has a auto-response that does not answer the question being asked.“ April 28, 2026 ## Showing most helpful reviews Showing 1-25 of 190 Reviews Sort by: Most Helpful Rating Company Size Reviewer's Role Length of Use Frequency of Use Hector T. Sr. Director Presales CoE Computer Software Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Nobody wants to answer RFPs, Responsive makes it easier" March 27, 2026 4.0 I think the solution has many areas for improvement, particularly in AI and library maintenance, but the core functionality is solid and delivers the key features needed by growing organizations. Pros No one wants to answer RFPs; it is an outdated industry practice. Responsive makes this easier by providing a central repository for all RFP responses and enabling collaboration among team members, which improves productivity by allowing people from different teams to work on proposals in parallel. Cons The AI capabilities are still immature, and the generated answers always need to be reviewed, which is time-consuming and undermines the solution's productivity gains. Review Source SB Susan B. Senior Technical Writer - NA RFP Manager CP ESG Computer Software Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Best Solution in the Industry to Me" April 16, 2026 5.0 I lovvvve Responsive! There is zero comparison to the tool I had previously that literally kept me working through the night! Pros The speed in which I can import projects. The export to original upload format. The AI, the AI!!!!! The wonderful responsive, accurate, helpful support team. The incredible staff, webinars, coffee chats, and community Cons When I find the hidden incapabiilties, contact the help team, and then realize that it is fact an incapability. For example, we can run one AI Draft per project; otherwise a staff member has to clone it to add an additional document. Switched from [Qvidian](https://www.capterra.com/p/6944/Qvidian-Proposal-Automation/) It was an old dinosaur with little to no support or innovation. Review Source HW Hannah W. Underwriting Analyst Pharmaceuticals Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Responsive Review" March 24, 2026 3.0 Ok. Has some features that simplifies the RFP process, while other navigation features make it harder. Pros It automates responses, and aids in seeing past responses. Helps track the progress of bids and sets reminders to meet deadlines. Cons The answers don't always pull in accurately for questions we have seen over and over again. Navigating questions can be difficult, or going back to finding an unanswered question is not straightforward. Review Source VR Verified Reviewer Technical Writer Education Management Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "An extremely powerful content management system for RFPs and Sales content." November 3, 2025 4.0 It's been a great experience. A huge step up from our previous platform. The power of the platform is a clear win...the flexibility and options to manage and review content is second to none. Once familiar with the platform, it offers amazing flexibility to a power user. Pros The rich feature set and flexibility around managing content is excellent. While it's a little intimidating at first, the amount of functionality is one of Responsive's strong points. Cons Occasionally there's bugs and glitches. I think the downside of having so many features and functionality is the risk that code clashes sometimes and bugs are present. Responsive is very errr...responsive with bugs and addressing support tickets which is a plus, however, it would be good if bugs weren't present in the first place of course. Alternatives considered [Loopio](https://www.capterra.com/p/133042/Loopio/) Reason for choosing Responsive A more powerful feature set and the functionality that aligned with our processes and org. Switched from [Ombud](https://www.capterra.com/p/204190/Ombud/) Lack of advanced features and functioanlity. Review Source KP Kate P. RFP Knowledge and Content Manager Insurance Used the software for: 2+ years ### "responsive IS responsive!" February 10, 2025 4.0 I enjoy responsive. I have used Loopio and Qvidian, and find this much simpler than both of these applications. Pros I like how user-friendly it is. I'm also enjoying the new grammar check capability. Cons How difficult it is to set up saved searches. Alternatives considered [Loopio](https://www.capterra.com/p/133042/Loopio/) Reason for choosing Responsive I did not make the final decision, but price did play a role, as did the fantastic responsive support staff. Switched from [Loopio](https://www.capterra.com/p/133042/Loopio/) I changed jobs, to be honest. I find the two applications quite similar. Review Source AM Abby M. Project Coordinator Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Tracks each question, review, task, and edit" February 13, 2025 4.0 The tool's content library had improved how quickly our company can respond to RFPs, RFIs, and RFQs Pros Being able to track who completes each question, review, and task, and when they do it. Cons Responsive sometimes does not recognize RFP documents in the import configuration setting. Switched from [Microsoft Teams](https://www.capterra.com/p/168668/Microsoft-Teams/) for the ability to save response content in the knowledge library Review Source NG Nick G. Director, Proposals Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Director, Proposals" April 16, 2026 5.0 I love Responsive. It's a great tool and best on the market. We couldn't do our job the same way without it. Pros Progress tracking is one at the top of the list. The amount of hours it saves our proposal managers on tracking the progress of a project is massive. That lone is worth the value. In addition, the accountability it holds with associates in reviewing their content. Without a system like Responsive's content library and review structure, our responses would not be where they are at today. Lastly, employee management - I oversee the proposal team and each morning I review a status on all projects to see where we are and having a dashboard like the Project view, executive dashboards, etc. it's extremely helpful. Cons Exporting into templates. My team spends a considerable amount of extra hours cleaning up the formatting when it doesn't export well or when we export into our template, but want to align with the clients RFP format - most times, it doesn't export that way, so the proposal managers spend countless hours cleaning this up. I have addressed this in the past. I would love it if there was a way we could have some sort of sequential author answering in the project. Today, we have multiple people that could contribute to one response. When one person is done, there is no way to track their progress, so what we have to do is create a manual process for tracking. It's extremely time consuming. Review Source MS Marcus S. Lead Solutions Engineer Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Responsive - the RFP lifesaver" April 28, 2026 5.0 On a daily basis, the platform actually feels like it was built for the people doing the work, not just the managers looking at the dashboard. It’s transformed our QA library from a messy fragmented and non contextual database into a resource we actually trust, which has made the day-to-day feel way more manageable and a resource we can trust. The AI is truly a life saver, I don't know what I'd do if my company ever looked to remove this tool.... Probably look for another job! Pros Before leveraging responsive, our team would spend hours or days hunting through old spreadsheets and pestering subject matter experts for the same five answers just because the question wasn't worded exactly the same. Now, the AI handles that first pass for us, and it’s surprisingly accurate. It actually pulls the right context for our security questionnaires and RFPs, which has cut our initial drafting time down to almost nothing. Cons Sometimes the collaboration with guest accounts can be a bit iffy if I need to involve someone who is not on the platform, I don't always know if they've received the question or reviewed it. Contrasting this with a google docs @ tag, where it's easier to see revisions or they can resolve the tag, I often resort to slack to double check. Review Source JL Johanny L. Sr. RFP Manager Computer Software Used the software for: 2+ years ### "A Practical, Time‑Saving Tool for Modern RFP Teams" April 16, 2026 5.0 Overall, my experience with Responsive was positive. It made RFP responses more organized, collaborative, and efficient, especially when it came to reusing content and keeping teams aligned. While it required some upkeep to get the most value out of it, it ultimately helped reduce manual effort and made the process feel more controlled and scalable. Pros What I liked most about Responsive was how intuitive and practical it was for real RFP work. The content library made it easy to reuse curated, trusted answers, collaboration was smooth across teams, and the automation genuinely saved time without taking control away. Overall, it reduced friction and made the process feel much more manageable. Cons The platform could feel a bit heavy at times. Search and answer suggestions sometimes required a lot of tuning, and if the content wasn’t well‑maintained, the library could get cluttered quickly. Reporting and admin tasks also felt more complex than they needed to be, especially for day‑to‑day use. Review Source EM Elizabeth M. Sr Mgr, Global Commercial Contracts Medical Devices Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Responsive is a good tool for IT assessments/customer questionnaires" April 16, 2026 4.0 I've had a good experience with Repsonsive. I brought the tool to my current company after using with my previous employer. The Q/A database makes the product worthwhile to respond to customer IT assessments and customer questionnaires. Pros The Q/A Library is the tool's best benefit. Having a place to store and easily access company information collected through previous work efforts is valuable and improves efficiency and reliance on internal stakeholders. Cons Inability to work easily with online portals and challenging formatting. Online portals that do not easily allow for input/export is a manual and time consuming effort that is supported by the Q/A library. Second - customers format their documents differently, and not all are easy to upload in responsive causing duplication of effort. Review Source AJ Ankit J. Senior Proposal Specialist Human Resources Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "RFPIO review" February 5, 2025 5.0 It was the best experience for me. I will say it is the best tool I have worked in. Its simplicity is the best thing. Pros Responsive is one of the best RFP tool I have worked on. Any functionality from RFPIO is top notch be it a UI, export functionality, AI response. I will say RFPIO is the best tool for RFP responses. Cons Some time import of Ariba file doesnt work as it fail to take drop done. Also word template for response also some time create issues. Alternatives considered [RocketDocs](https://www.capterra.com/p/82490/PMAPS/) Reason for choosing Responsive RFPIO UI , export functionality and integration simplicity won the battle. Switched from [Loopio](https://www.capterra.com/p/133042/Loopio/) Loopio was failing at some point so we thought of moving to RFPIO. Review Source RD Rui D. Bid Manager Computer & Network Security Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Review of Responsive" February 13, 2025 4.0 Positive and with great potential to develop within the tool Pros How powerful is the tool and how depth you can go on the answering library page and project Cons Licensing costs and slow response times when pasting text into search functions Alternatives considered [Google Docs](https://www.capterra.com/p/160756/Google-Docs/) Reason for choosing Responsive Powerful options and tool for content management Switched from [Loopio](https://www.capterra.com/p/133042/Loopio/) more powerful suite to use for content management Review Source BO Brittany O. Proposal Manager E-Learning Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Responsive is pretty good" December 12, 2024 4.0 Generally, I've been very impressed with the customer service and training we've received from responsive. Overall they seem to be responsive to our needs and willing to dig into bugs thoroughly Pros I like how seamless most things are, I like the review workflow, I like that many things are customizable for the organization Cons While most things are seamless, there are still some issues with linking the modules. We often try to find projects in the Recommended search that should be in our archive but these two entities are separate. Also there are spacing issues and formatting issues upon export. Merge tags also seem to add random spaces or make adding text around the merge tag difficult and time consuming. I've tried to float some of these issues to responsive but often they have just let me know that that is a known function of the software. Switched from [Ombud](https://www.capterra.com/p/204190/Ombud/) Ombud was not innovating at all and we could never get any movement on the bugs we experienced. I will admit that sometimes we miss Ombud for exporting and formatting, as Responsive tends to add errors to the final product, but the management tools in Responsive make the switch worth it for us still. We're also hopeful that Responsive will continue to keep our feedback in mind and improve on the product, which was something we were not confident about with Ombud. Review Source BL Bill L. Global Institutional Sales Support and Client Relations Investment Management Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Extreme Time Saver" August 8, 2024 5.0 Responsive has helped increase my job efficiency greatly. With the platform, I'm able to easily add and remove Q/A pairings as well as leverage the current pairings we have in the database with ease. The ability to filter for certain things using the tags or collections feature helps me find things a lot quicker and remove any irrelevant items, ensuring the answers always pertain to exactly what I'm looking for. The only critiques I have with it are small ones which can be fixed or a new feature could be added to mitigate the problem. Overall, it's a very helpful platform that I encourage others in the industry to use, to help fill out questionnaires, as it has saved my team and I countless hours a year with the answering process. Pros \- Very user friendly - Smooth transitions between tabs and sections - Lots of options for sorting and filtering - "Collections" feature is extremely helpful Cons \- Copy and paste function sometimes doesn't work properly - When I'm in a Q/A pair, I'm unable to see what (if any) collection the pair is a part of. You can see this with the tags, so I'd like to see it with collections as well Alternatives considered [Loopio](https://www.capterra.com/p/133042/Loopio/) Reason for choosing Responsive I wasn't a part of the decision-making process, however, my team told me that Responsive seemed easier to use and had a more robust database storage system in place. Review Source EB Elizabeth B. Senior Proposal Manager Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Easy to Use! " September 13, 2022 4.0 Overall, the process has been great. We had to do a quick migration to RFPIO so we would not be locked into a contract with our previous vendor. THey worked with us and helped us get the training we needed as fast as possible to have an MVP. Pros RFPIO has helped streamline the RFP process in our organization. We are able to include more SMEs in the RFP process with little to no training. The previous software we used, was very hard to figure out and manage, which resulted in necessary people not wanting to engage with the tool because it was too complicated. RFPIO changed all of this for us and has made it easy for our teams to collaborate. Cons We had some issues integrating with Salesforce, and the reporting aspect is still not what we want it to be. We have custom roles, and because we only use SSO we cannot 'impersonate' other roles for training and development purposes. Alternatives considered [Loopio](https://www.capterra.com/p/133042/Loopio/) Switched from [Qvidian](https://www.capterra.com/p/6944/Qvidian-Proposal-Automation/) The product was not user-friendly and lacked many features. The final issue that led to the switch was having a production issue for over 4 months that kept us from being able to complete RFPs and resulted in a lot of re-work. Even after multiple escalations to their development, they could not solve their own issue. Our contract was up for renewal so we made the decision to switch. Review Source AC Anjali C. Client Diligence Specialist Financial Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Responsiveness at Its Best." March 27, 2026 5.0 My overall experience with Responsive has been quite positive. The platform stands out for its clear structure and organization—each product is categorized neatly, and every section has a designated owner, which makes it easy to know exactly who to reach out to within different business units. That clarity really streamlines communication and reduces confusion. Pros What I like most about Responsive is how it categorizes each product clearly, and how every section has its own owner. This makes it very easy to understand which business unit to reach out to. Cons The aspect I find least favorable is that when exporting to Excel or Word, the formatting often becomes inconsistent despite selecting a specific font. Review Source AK Anthony K. Proposals and Data Analyst Information Technology and Services Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "AI enabled RFP responding platform which allows for cross functional collaboration" February 19, 2025 5.0 Good experience so far. RFPIO is extensively used as part of my role. Pros AI enabled RFP responding platform which provides automatic prompts for each question. Collaborative platform allows entire teams to work on a single project. Cons Formatting when downloading means that images are not embedded in cells during download and extraction process. Review Source DP Daryn P. Senior Proposal Contract Specialist Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Responsive Review " February 13, 2025 4.0 Overall, it's a good experience. A signature option for each project would be a nice feature. Pros I like the content library and the efficiency of managing projects. Cons The inability to distill bids within the platform. Review Source AG Abhiroop G. Manager Information Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Responsive : Game changer using AI" December 18, 2024 4.0 The overall experience of Responsive has been positive. Responsive has improved the throwput and helped maintain a standard response across various presales personnel Pros Responsive's AI add-in has been a game changer for our team. The AI add-in not only helps speed up the response but also automates a lot of redundant tasks that the team had to perform. Cons Reponsive has recently changed their licensing model. The current licensing model doesn't support scaling without breaking the bank. Alternatives considered [Loopio](https://www.capterra.com/p/133042/Loopio/) Reason for choosing Responsive We had existing relationship with RFPIO. Review Source HC Heather C. Proposal Manager Security and Investigations Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Life saver!" February 13, 2025 5.0 Its great! I also really like the ability to search in the content library without making a project if I'm just needing a small piece of content! Pros I love the various tags, I also appreciate the ability to add questions sets and answers to the library for a reviewer to vet and then place for the entire team to use. Cons Sometimes charts and pictures do not retain the quality resolution Review Source EL ERIC L. Proposal Manager Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Response to Responsive" February 4, 2025 4.0 Not used all the time but it can be a timesaver when utilized propoerly. Pros Repository for all responses, ease of use, filtering Cons Updates to the database of responses needs to be constantly maintained Review Source PS Pratik S. Senior Manager - Solution Design Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "RFPIO Streamlines the RFx response and ensures faster accurate responses" November 11, 2024 4.0 RFPIO has improved the overall quality and efficiency while responding to RFPs Pros The extensive repository and auto-answer functionality Cons User interface can be improved better and more AI features are required which will help faster and accurate completion of RFP Review Source GK Guillermo K. RFP Manager Financial Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Great tool " April 4, 2024 4.0 Overall, very positive. Right now it is a central part of our working process, so I cannot see myself going back to no tool, as it was our case. Pros That it was very easy to start working with, and that we have all the previous content in a very accesible way. The reports we receive are great, as we can have an overview of the projects and create stats on how we are working. Cons We need to work very hard to keep everything updated. We have too many products and sub-companies, and therefore it is very difficult to use the AI automatic answers. There are many applications we are not using because they are limited to the admin, so I dont think we are using the full power of the tool. But that is more on us, I guess. Review Source Anthony R. Sales Operations Specialist - Proposal Manager Computer Software Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "The Most Flexible RFP Tool Available" December 7, 2018 5.0 As one of RFPIO's early customers, I can honestly say that our experience has been nothing but absolutely amazing. We've been able to calculate massive returns on investment in using their software, and I've enjoyed working with their team so much. RFPIO didn't just introduce me to a proposal tool, they introduced me to the proposal community. Pros RFPIO has the best document import in the business. It's flexible enough to handle almost any format of document, but still offers plenty of time-saving shortcuts. The export functionality is also very good--it almost always results in a clean, tidy document. I also love the flexibility of the Answer Library. Features like merge tags, intelligent tagging, custom fields, collections and categories mean that the Library is more than capable of handling just about any business case you can throw at it. Cons My computer tends to have some latency issues when trying to work with large projects, and everything takes maybe just one more click than I'd like, but I also think that the payoff there is an interface which really does not need to much explanation for end-users. Review Source Response from Responsive (formerly RFPIO) December 11, 2018 Thank you, thank you, Anthony! We've learned a lot from working with you, and are so pleased to hear that you are finding community in your work with us and other proposal professionals. We're always looking for ways to make the user experience better, so we appreciate your feedback in that area too. Looking forward to measuring even more efficiencies in the RFP response process with MasterControl! Collette C. Director, Strategic Sales Support Marketing and Advertising Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Game changing for the RFP team" December 3, 2018 5.0 As stated in the title, RFPIO has really changed how we manage the RFP process. It has allowed us to bring all of our SMEs into the system and saved us from countless versioning, passing Word docs around, copying and pasting updates into a master, etc. Our team can communicate and collaborate with ease. It is tremendously cost-effective in that it frees our technical folks and others to spend more time on their core jobs and less time digging for RFP answers. Pros The ease of collaboration across the company and the ability to manage the RFP process in a far more streamlined fashion than previously. RFPIO allows the user to search for just the right content with ease. RFPIO has truly changed the way we do business -- for the better. Cons Nothing, really. Whenever I have had an issue (all minor) with how the software works (for instance, a notification I wanted to turn off), the RFPIO team helped me with a workaround. It really works extremely well for us. Review Source Response from Responsive (formerly RFPIO) December 5, 2018 Thank you for such a thoughtful review, Collette! We love hearing that your teams are collaborating better and your RFP process has gotten stronger. Cheers to our continued partnership with you and the Yes Marketing team! Similar Products Featured ## Send me user reviews about this product ### Fill out the form and we'll send a list of the top-rated software based on real user reviews directly to your inbox.