Helping businesses choose
better software since 1999
better software since 1999
Guides & Research
Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology. Learn more.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Pros
A nice combination of tool, support and academy to do sustainable content marketing.
Helps me to write better content, maintain my content assets, manage multiple customer projects, impress my customers.
Cons
Unfortunately, in practice this was only possible to a limited extent. Our contact person was always relatively unprepared for Meeting.
It's quite hard to use because it gives you so many options to organise your content marketing process.
Showing Most Helpful
Showing 10 of 10 reviews
"Start in Content Marketing"
Overall: The central challenge: to get rid of different files, to add a platform for all processes including the analysis.
Pros: The mapping of the entire process is the greatest strength. From research to publication to re-fresh of content - everything takes place on one platform. This structure makes contentbird a good companion.
Cons: More interfaces to CMS should be created so that content can be transferred directly (currently only for Wordpress).
"Consulting needs understanding - understanding needs excellent articles with easy reading"
Overall: We have professionalized our whole editorial workflow and were able to reduce lead-times from 18h to 5h per article (normed on 1500 words, 3 infografics and meaningful titles /subtitles). Only with contentbird was it possible.
Pros: My team and I work daily with contentbird to create excellent blog-posts for entrepreneurs, who search for information to solve their problems in business. These articles have to excellent in content, because the business-owners rely on our information. On the other hand, not every business-owner has an MBA grade, so our articles have to be easy readable and understandable. The integrated content assessment functions like the Flesch-Index for easy reading or the keyword-hunter to find other important topics help us to write these articles. Also to match every content to your personas and your publishing strategy is super-helpful to keep focused on your audience.
Cons: The first import of existing content from my blogs to contentbird was only able to to with the help of the support. But the support was great and did it really very fast without any problems or any fees. After that initial setup, everything worked great. In future, it should be able to do the initial setup without the need of the support-team.
"Clash of Sale Promises to reality."
Overall: The overall experience was quite frustrating.
Pros: The Tool offers a lot of opportunities to plan Content. It’s easy to collaborate with various Department or Agencies
Cons: We had specific use cases that we wanted to map with Contentbird. The sales team assured us it wouldn't be a problem. Unfortunately, in practice this was only possible to a limited extent. Our contact person was always relatively unprepared for Meeting
"Centralise your Content Database"
Pros: Forces you to add relevant data to your content process
Cons: It's quite hard to use because it gives you so many options to organise your content marketing process. But once you get used to it, you'll love it.
"Indispensable software for offpage marketing and content creation"
Overall: We use contentbird to manage our pr campaigns and monitor link structures. It helps us a lot in our daily work and we don't want to miss the tool anymore.
Pros: easy handling, good overview and alaysis area
Cons: Actually, everything's fine. Maybe there could be more user accounts included
"A nice workbench for all content creating people - sometimes a bit buggy"
Overall: A nice combination of tool, support and academy to do sustainable content marketing.
Pros: It summarize a lot of features for creating and publishing and shareable workflow.
Cons: The content pipeline search doesn't find anythin if you use phrases
"Complete Content Process on one Platform"
Overall: helps me to write better content, maintain my content assets, manage multiple customer projects, impress my customers
Pros: integrated SEO tools, mindmap, workflows, one easy-to-use platform covers the (w)holistic content creation process.
Cons: transferring content to WordPress is somewhat clumsy
"Sehr übersichtliches Tool"
Overall: Sehr gut
Pros: Strukturiert und übersichtlicher Aufbau.
Cons: Bisher keine Funktionen gefunden welche fehlen.
"Umfangreiches Tool mit sehr gutem Kundensupport"
Pros: Nach ausführlicher Einführung und Unterstützung gelingt es immer besser, das Content-Marketing strukturiert, geplant und fundiert anzugehen. Die verfügbare Data und internen Tools sparen sehr viel Zeit und Arbeit.Die Benutzeroberfläche macht es angenehm, mit Contentbird zu arbeiten, auch wenn sie nicht mehr so ganz modern aussieht.
Cons: Wenn ich längere Zeit nicht im Tool drin war, bin ich immer wieder etwas auf der Suche, was ich alles genau finden konnte und welche Schritte ich durchlaufen soll.
"Good outreach software"
Pros: Easy to manage bulk email sending and receiving Notifications if any backlink goes offline Avoids opening new communications with old leads
Cons: Interface is a bit overwhelming at first Not completely translated (some parts in German)